User talk:Geschichte

Proposed deletion of FC Nika Ivano-Frankivsk

The article FC Nika Ivano-Frankivsk has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Failure of WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT, with no significant and independent coverage. Found no in-depth content for the football club.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. JoeNMLC (talk) 14:48, 19 May 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of Zuzana Malíková for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zuzana Malíková is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zuzana Malíková until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

Playing position shortcuts

Hi Geschichte. While playing position shortcuts, like "RB" and "RW" which you used at Serafín García, produce the desired output, [[Right-back]] and [[right winger]] in the case of Serafín García, I think we should avoid using them as they are less clear for people editing the infobox. What's your rationale for using the shortcuts, is it brevity? Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 11:17, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

Brevity is one thing, but I've mainly done it to bypass redirects. RW produces a piped link directly to the correct anchor at [[Midfielder]]. Is it not also the case that the abbreviations, like GK, are familiar to most who follow football? After all we use GK, DF, MF and FW in squad lists and the like. I'm not adamant on this though. Geschichte (talk) 15:22, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

mainly done […] to bypass redirects. Ah, interesting. What I took away from WP:NOTBROKEN is that redirects are not a problem… Is it not also the case that the abbreviations, like GK, are familiar to most who follow football? I'm not sure. "GK" seems relatively obvious but some others, like "RW", less so. Robby.is.on (talk) 15:46, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Original Barnstar
		For your work on Grimfist. Good job! Bearian (talk) 00:11, 16 June 2026 (UTC)

Thank you! I could have done even more, but at least the article was saved. Geschichte (talk) 06:35, 16 June 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of Iļja Novikovs for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Iļja Novikovs is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iļja Novikovs until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may still edit the article, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	For Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elipidio Fortuna where you identified that the article subject had another article under a different version of his name. Well done. GRuban (talk) 17:50, 23 June 2026 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Vladimer Dgebuadze

The article Vladimer Dgebuadze has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. JHD0919 (talk) 13:05, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

Glenn Walker (footballer, born 1998)/Joakim Bjerkås AFDs

Really poor form not to notify article creator about these AFDs... GiantSnowman 19:02, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

You specifically asked me to take them to AFD, it should therefore not come as a surprise. Geschichte (talk) 14:21, 4 July 2026 (UTC)

Nidrosian black metal CSD

Hi. I removed the {{db-llm}} tag for Nidrosian black metal because "an AI detector said it's 100% AI" is not a valid subcriterion of G15. You have to demonstrate that there is either communication intended for the user or nonexistent/nonsensical references. Just citing the results of a detector is insufficient. SuperPianoMan9167 (talk) 22:51, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

Listing for discussion of Template:Egil Olsen era

Template:Egil Olsen era has been listed for discussion, which may result in the template being merged or deleted by consensus. You are invited to comment on the proposed action at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. S.A. Julio (talk) 22:45, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:AC Alcacerense

Hello, Geschichte. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:AC Alcacerense, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:06, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

Your comments

Can you please explain your comments that I added "low quality" comments? What makes you call them low quality? Can I ask in the future that you please discuss things with me instead of WP:CASTING? Khalitate (talk) 06:59, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

"Per nomination" is regarded as a comment that does not add to discussions. It was abundantly clear that you did what is called "drive-by voting", with the lack of content and high rapidity of replies. It may even lead to being blocked for disruptive editing. It might have come across as a "biting" comment, but I only described the action and not your person. Geschichte (talk) 11:54, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

I view all of my edits as constructive. Can you point me to a policy that prohibits voting on multiple AfDs and agreeing with the nominator? Khalitate (talk) 05:07, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

The votes are not constructive. You will have to consider deferring to WP:PERX and WP:NOTAVOTE. Geschichte (talk) 06:02, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

Thanks, I will keep that in mind in the future (I'm still relatively new here). I would appreciate in the future if you could raise any potential issues with me directly. Khalitate (talk) 06:42, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jan Magne Skanke

The article Jan Magne Skanke has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:31, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of Alain Nurenberg for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alain Nurenberg is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alain Nurenberg until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may still edit the article, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	For your 20 years of editing and 141,000+ edits, a remarkable acheivement! RossEvans19 (talk) 14:12, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Steiny Hill

If you want to actually contribute to Wikipedia, then use my example for what I did to Steiny Hill instead of just nominating it for deletion. And do the same for each similar article you are nominating for deletion -420Traveler (talk) 22:19, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

College Hill (New York)

Would you object to my redirect of this to Hamilton College? Bearian (talk) 03:37, 12 August 2026 (UTC)

Crow Hill (Hamilton County, New York)

@Geschichte: Use what I did as an example. Instead of trying to delete content, put it where it should go!! -420Traveler (talk) 11:51, 12 August 2026 (UTC)

Move to mainspace

Please, move to mainspace this article. Thanks. Umarxon III (talk) 08:18, 2 September 2026 (UTC)

He does not look notable to me, but I added the "submit for review" button for you. You can now press that button and get help. Can you perhaps also add his various clubs to the infobox? Geschichte (talk) 08:38, 2 September 2026 (UTC)

Done. Umarxon III (talk) 10:36, 2 September 2026 (UTC)

Click the blue "submit for review". Geschichte (talk) 10:39, 2 September 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of Fredrik Svensson (race walker) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fredrik Svensson (race walker) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fredrik Svensson (race walker) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may still edit the article, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

Script suggestion

Heya, I noticed you manually closed an AfD discussion. In case you weren't already aware of it, the XFDcloser tool can help you avoid making all these repetitive edits, such as removing the templates and adding a talk page banner. Soon, it will even handle the merge templates on the destination pages! FaviFake (talk) 22:57, 2 September 2026 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bangsund IL

The article Bangsund IL has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Failure of WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT, with no significant and independent coverage. Found no in-depth content for the sports club.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. JoeNMLC (talk) 20:05, 9 September 2026 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Tinav Ahmedov

The article Tinav Ahmedov has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Poorly sourced BLP sub-stub.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:31, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sébastien Berthelot

The article Sébastien Berthelot has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable BLP.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:30, 13 September 2026 (UTC)