User talk:Jsthewikiperson

Thanks for your contributions to Stac Shoaigh. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. – LuniZunie ツ_(talk) 15:57, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Marley Lockhart. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and better quality sources to reliably verify the contents. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:06, 16 November 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page John Barton (Fugitive), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 09:57, 20 November 2025 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ChrysGalley was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

It's a fascinating story, but some more work is needed on the sourcing.

1) Source 5 = https://charleshenrycherrett.com/ = this does not seem to exist, and it's used in 3 places. 2) Pinterest - that is a content aggregator, and it scraped this information from the Penwith group. I don't think the BBC letter is pivotal, but if you do want to use it you best find the source on Penwith rather than the scrape site. 3) U-boat.net is a forum, self published and un-edited - they can't be used as sources There are some exceptions but they don't seem to apply here. It could be used in the External links section. I see that the subject grandson was contributing, which makes interesting but not from a sourcing perspective. Also source 22 on that forum doesn't appear to work.

I hope you can resolve this since there is a good article here, and I think it's fairly close to being OK now.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Charles Cherrett and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ChrysGalley (talk) 19:50, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

@ChrysGalley Thanks for your tips, I'll improve the article! Jsthewikiperson (talk) 21:52, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

Hi Jsthewikiperson. Thank you for your work on Murder of Jon James Casey. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for creating this pages; reaches WP:NCRIME through the sustained coverage and international nature of the escape and investigation.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 21:17, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

@Klbrain: Thank you for the review and for taking the time to look over the article — much appreciated. Jsthewikiperson (talk) 21:30, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to British Lawn Mower Racing Association when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Just because you specify |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= must be defined in the template. You can look at the documentation for the template you are using but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. Note I have likely fixed the error by now so check the history of the page to see how it was fixed. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 02:50, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to Hervé Leclerc when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Just because you specify |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= must be defined in the template. You can look at the documentation for the template you are using but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. Note I have likely fixed the error by now so check the history of the page to see how it was fixed. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 16:31, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Charles Henry Cherrett Lighthouse keeper-2 (1).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:27, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

Hi Jsthewikiperson. I noticed that you used mabumbe.com as a reference for biographical information in Gina-Maria Bethke. It appears to be a web scraper and so unreliable. I've gone ahead and removed it. If you disagree, let's discuss it. You may want to check WP:RSP and WP:RSN to help determine if a source is reliable. Thanks.--Hipal (talk) 23:28, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know! Jsthewikiperson (talk) 08:39, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Jsthewikiperson,

Thank you for creating Draft:Stone Island (Poole).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Moved to draft page, new articles need significant coverage (WP:SIGCOV) from multiple reliable sources. As it stands the article lacks this.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Boynamedsue}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boynamedsue (talk) 18:49, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

Hi Jsthewikiperson. Thank you for your work on Am Plastair. Another editor, Orange sticker, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

I've removed a number of citations from this article that don't refer to Am Plastair at all, along with speculation about what the name indicates which constitutes WP:OR. This can make an article look like it was created by a large language model, so please take care to keep citations relevant.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Orange sticker}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Orange sticker (talk) 09:55, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Charlie Wright (actor), a link pointing to the disambiguation page Better Things was added. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Jian Seng, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A generic name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use place-holder names. Please edit the article to include the source's actual author or editor name. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:43, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm DJ-Aomand. An edit that you recently made to Ghost ship seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications is usually unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and may contain factually inaccurate statements, fictitious citations, or other problems. You should instead read reliable sources and then summarize those in your own words. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or ask your questions on the Teahouse, a friendly place for new users. I would highly advise reading WP:NOLLM, as the guidelines for what LLM may be used for have changed relatively recently. DJ-Aomand (talk) 11:24, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know,

I'll rephrase the text in my own words. Jsthewikiperson (talk) 11:40, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for contributing to the article List of missing ships. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be verifiable and attributed to reliable sources. You have recently used citations which copied, or mirrored, material from Wikipedia. This leads to a circular reference and is not acceptable. Most mirrors are clearly labeled as such, but some are in violation of our license and do not provide the correct attribution. Please help by adding alternate sources to the article you edited! If you need any help or clarification, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, or just ask me. Thank you. Sam Kuru (talk) 11:22, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know! Jsthewikiperson (talk) 14:21, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to Studland Armco Pillbox when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Just because you specify |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= must be defined in the template. You can look at the documentation for the template you are using but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. Note I have likely fixed the error by now so check the history of the page to see how it was fixed. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:34, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know! Jsthewikiperson (talk) 15:42, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Jsthewikiperson. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Marley Lockhart, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:06, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Jsthewikiperson. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:West Windsor Residents Association, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:09, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

Hi Jsthewikiperson. Thank you for your work on Throop Mill. Another editor, JTtheOG, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work. Just be careful with the close paraphrasing. Some lines look very similar to [historicengland.org.uk/listing/the-list/list-entry/1392608 1]. Cheers!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|JTtheOG}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

JTtheOG (talk) 00:35, 1 May 2026 (UTC)

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Jsthewikiperson! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

If you have questions, just use this link to ask for help; a volunteer will visit you here shortly!

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! ~ŤheŴubṂachine-840≈ ● ✒️ 16:09, 1 May 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Jsthewikiperson. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "West Windsor Residents Association".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 11:25, 2 May 2026 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kerestell Smith is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be redirected.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kerestell Smith until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

~ A412 ^talk! 17:40, 2 May 2026 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kerestell Smith, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kerestell Smith until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know Jsthewikiperson (talk) 11:51, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to David Ndahura when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Just because you specify |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= must be defined in the template. You can look at the documentation for the template you are using but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. Note I have likely fixed the error by now so check the history of the page to see how it was fixed. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 02:24, 13 May 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to Luca Corberi when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Just because you specify |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= must be defined in the template. You can look at the documentation for the template you are using but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. Note I have likely fixed the error by now so check the history of the page to see how it was fixed. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:36, 17 May 2026 (UTC)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Devonian Wombat, left the following feedback:

This draft's references do not show that the person meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for people. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

• provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis;
• are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
• are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Unfortunately, the Business Insider piece is not enough to demonstrate Cassel's notability, as all other sources give him either only incidental coverage or none at all. A note to future reviewers that attempts have been made to improve this draft and I would not recommend rejecting it fully in spite of the many, many reviews.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Erik Cassel to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

Devonian Wombat (talk) 11:33, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

Thanks! Jsthewikiperson (talk) 15:23, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

Again, at John of Sandwich (ship). Please carefully evaluate the sources you are using. If they clearly state that they are copied from here, then the reference is not usable. Thanks. Sam Kuru (talk) 22:00, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know. I've removed the citation in question! Jsthewikiperson (talk) 15:25, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

I wanted to let you know that I've returned both Sidemen FC and YouTube Allstars to redirects. None of the sources in either article show significant, individual coverage outside of mentions as part of a larger topic (in this case the charity match). I know this can be frustrating, and I'm sorry. FWIW, I learned this myself when trying to write an article for a video game character a year ago, and despite having an abundance of sources, few to none of them described the topic individually (as in outside of a larger topic), with significant coverage. I hope this doesn't discourage you for contributing as you write well, it's just these subjects in particular were not notable. Feel free to ping me if you have any questions. Johnson524 21:02, 24 May 2026 (UTC)

No, it's ok, thanks for letting me know. I get that they aren't notable enough in their own right, thanks for telling me. Jsthewikiperson (talk) 06:35, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for uploading File:Luca Corberi.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Gert7 (talk · contribs) 18:34, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Tristan da Cunha FC.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 21:21, 25 May 2026 (UTC)