User talk:TheGreatEditor024

Hello TheGreatEditor024! Your additions to Elmech EM 992 have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license—to request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

• Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
• Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
• Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
• Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § Licensing.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 02:20, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

I really didn't know that Designs topic would create an issue. Thank you for removing it TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 02:23, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article India at the Deaflympics has failed. See the review page for more information. If or when the reviewer's feedback has been addressed, you may nominate the article again. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Arconning -- Arconning (talk) 14:43, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

I appreciate the help you provided, even if I don’t remember where u came from - but please don’t change the structure I have it as, such as moving the infobox template and capitalizing the headings. I understand why u did and I’m not trying to be mean or assume bad faith. this is also against WP:NOBAN. — Aurora :3 • (📭|edits) 23:00, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

Well I came from Wikipedia Help desk. You said "i have a problem with {{userboxside}}" and also added "feel free to edit the page". So, I edited the page.

I am sorry if I messed up. TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 01:58, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

I capitalized the heading because it felt a bit weird. I didn't know that it was on purpose. TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 02:01, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

Sorry, I guess I tried to improve the wrong infobox. No wonder, you got confused. I did mess up. TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 03:35, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

oh. i linked which page i wanted help with, but maybe u didn’t see that. maybe i should’ve put it in the comment itself rather than the title.

thats on me as well a bit, since im autistic. that may make me say or put things in an unconventional way. i was making sure u knew the guidelines, but it appears it was just a misunderstanding. that’s goofy.

no bad blood at all! 😁 — Aurora :3 • (📭|edits) 05:45, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

Nope, It's my fault. I didn't see the link. TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 06:16, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

I’m not the best person to help with this specific userbox. Also, just a note that some of the wording on your page may come across as offensive to others, so you might want to review it in line with Wikipedia’s guidelines on user pages. Another editor at the Help Desk should be able to assist further. TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 03:48, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

no, no you didn’t mess up! i wouldn’t put it like that.

which sentence(s) makes u feel that way? — Aurora :3 • (📭|edits) 05:38, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

Your references. You wrote

1. Christianity is the biggest religion in the world, with over 2B adherents. alongside Islam, they both make up of the entire world’s stupidity."

(You should know that this statement hurts almost billions of people)

Btw are you anti-communist or anti-capitalist. you wrote both lol TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 06:19, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

well, that’s what i believe but i hid it.

im both anti-communist and anti-capitalist. — Aurora :3 • (📭|edits) 03:12, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

I would advice that it would be great if you removed Anti-Islam, Anti-Christian and Anti-Judaism from your infobox :religious views. TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 06:23, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

@Tonkarooson I'm inclined to agree here (I spotted this discussion when I happened to pop in to TGE's talk page.) Wikipedia is not a soapbox for anybody's political or religious ideologies; and we're all really better off if we don't talk about such things at all. There is no need for any of us to know where you stand on such issues. We're all here to build an encyclopedia, which by its very nature requires we leave our ideologies and biases at the door (as much as such a thing is possible). It's an "I [won't] show you mine if you [won't] show me yours" sort of thing. (This obviously doesn't apply to your statement of support for queer rights; human rights aren't, or rather shouldn't be, a political issue.) Athanelar (talk) 17:02, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

ok that’s fine. there’s also WP:UPYES. is the stuff on my main userspace fine?

i want to keep it but i’ll hide it. — Aurora :3 • (📭|edits) 03:02, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

More relevant is WP:UPNOT which says there is broad agreement that you may not include in your user space material that is likely... to give widespread offense which stating that something like 4 billion people "make up the entire world's stupidity" certainly is (even if, as I have a hunch is the case, Wikipedia's editor-base generally trends toward atheism)

I would also say you're leaning a bit towards excessive personal information unrelated to Wikipedia per WP:USERBIO. I'm not going to unilaterally tell you you should trim any of it, but I would just like to gently point you in the direction of WP:NOTSOCIALMEDIA; user pages... should be used primarily to present information relevant to work on the encyclopedia. Limited autobiographical information is allowed, but user pages do not serve as personal webpages,

Like a lot of younger queer editors I've seen around, you seem to be mostly using your userpage like you would use a Carrd link in your twitter bio. This is appropriate to some extent (we definitely need to know your preferred pronouns so we can interact with you respectfully, of course) but things like your eye colour and a list of philosophies you subscribe to are leaning toward being out of scope. There's nothing specific I could tell you to remove in order to fix it, because it's more of an evident philosophical approach to the way you're approaching the concept of a userpage. Athanelar (talk) 12:45, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

yes, of course. I apologize for this. I’ll work on it now. — Aurora :3 • (📭|edits) 22:45, 19 April 2026 (UTC)

wait. lemme just make sure here. which should i exactly get rid of? i think it’ll be the religious part, right? — Aurora :3 • (📭|edits) 22:47, 19 April 2026 (UTC)

Like I said, There's nothing specific I could tell you to remove in order to fix it, because it's more of an evident philosophical approach to the way you're approaching the concept of a userpage. I don't think it's as simple as 'remove X and Y and it'll be better,' that's why I just wanted to give you some general pointers as to what the purpose of a userpage here is supposed to be. Athanelar (talk) 23:09, 19 April 2026 (UTC)

i read the project page before.

👍 — Aurora :3 • (📭|edits) 01:24, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

first of all, i’m not trying to offend anyone - attack the argument, not the person.

i didnt exactly think wp:soap applied there but i guess it does. i kept it so i can put it somewhere else. until then, i’ll fully remove it. i’d rather not make it a big deal. i messed up, i apologize for that, i just wanted to share my opinions. — Aurora :3 • (📭|edits) 03:17, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

Please don't announce to users that they've been reported to WP:SPI. There's no need for them to know. If the check comes out positive, then they get blocked as a sock and that's done; if the check comes out negative, then they never know they were under suspicion. In the best case scenario where the user is innocent, then you'll distress them by implying they're in some kind of trouble. If the user is guilty, then you might let them know someone is 'on their scent' and prompt them to abandon the account and try evading their block with other accounts (which a checkuser should be able to check anyway, but in any case there's no reason to tip them off.)

There is a reason why SPI does not mandate that we inform people they've been reported, unlike ANI. There's generally no need, nor nothing to be gained, from users 'responding' on their SPI. Athanelar (talk) 16:57, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

I am sorry, I was just trying to help, but I shouldn’t have said that directly. I'll handle it properly next time TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 17:04, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

Don't worry about it, I totally understand, I just wanted to make you aware for the future! You might want to read the relevant essays WP:BEANS and WP:DENY, which are both about limiting the kinds of information or interaction we have with [potentially] problematic editors. Athanelar (talk) 17:06, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

Well, I am new to discussions other than WP:Teahouse, So i kinda messed up. btw, I'll make sure that I'll read the links you posted. TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 17:09, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article Wonsan Kalma Coastal Tourist Area is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Dragonhawk12 -- Dragonhawk12 (talk) 20:06, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Pala, Kerala, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A generic name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use place-holder names. Please edit the article to include the source's actual author or editor name. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 18:01, 19 April 2026 (UTC)

Quick facts

story · music · places

Close

... welcome to WP:QAI and thank you for improving article quality in April! -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:38, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

Thanks TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 17:49, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

Today's story is about one of three bios I brought to today's main page: look and listen, an extraordinary woman in many respects. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:19, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

Sure TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 13:25, 1 May 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article Wonsan Kalma Coastal Tourist Area has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the talk page for more information. If these are addressed within seven days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Dragonhawk12 (talk) (Guestbook) (Wikicats) 06:44, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article Wonsan Kalma Coastal Tourist Area has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Dragonhawk12 -- Dragonhawk12 (talk) 06:46, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article Wonsan Kalma Coastal Tourist Area has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Dragonhawk12 -- Dragonhawk12 (talk) 17:26, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

Dragonhawk12 has given you a kitten! Kittens promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Your kitten must be fed three times a day and will be your faithful companion forever! Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a kitten, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

Spread the goodness of kittens by adding {{subst:Kitten}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or kittynap their kitten with {{subst:Kittynap}}.

Congrats to getting Wonsan Kalma Coastal Tourist Area to Good Article status! I know from your wikipage that you like lions, so this is the closest template I've got. Keep up the good work! Dragonhawk12 (talk) (Guestbook) (Wikicats) 17:37, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

Thank you TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 17:38, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes#Requirements to accept an edit, when to accept an edit
  

* Pppery * _{it has begun...} 19:37, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

Thank you @Pppery TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 02:58, 22 April 2026 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of Wonsan Kalma Coastal Tourist Area at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! CMD (talk) 06:03, 22 April 2026 (UTC)

I have corrected the mistakes TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 06:31, 22 April 2026 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ukrainian liberation movement (1920–1950) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ukrainian liberation movement (1920–1950) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

Joko2468 (talk) 09:09, 2 May 2026 (UTC)

Hi and I am so sorry for the late response with regards to your query on Deaflympics. I regret to inform you that I am not much active in Wikipedia these days and I am busy with the work commitments. I am also facing indefinite ban from editing Wikipedia as well since February 2025. I have decided to shift my focus into other stuff. I did have a passion and vision on creating as many Wikipedia articles related to Deaflympics as I realised that the coverage on Deaflympic athletes in Wikipedia was comparatively lesser than the coverage about Olympic and Paralympic athletes. I made the initiative on my own to contribute from my end to write up articles related to Deaflympics. My interest in Deaflympics began in 2017 and I had created over 100 biographical articles about Deaflympic athletes. Unfortunately, there is a lack of awareness on Deaflympics at a broader level due to lack of interest among common audience and also due to lack of broadcasting rights on Deaflympics.

One thing I can tell you that I remember on how hard it was to convince the fellow Wikipedia editors in order push some high profile Deaflympic events on the front cover page of Wikipedia's ITN section. My nominations on both 2019 Winter Deaflympics and 2025 Summer Deaflympics are documentary proof for that. If you can look at the comments under my failed ITN nominations under Wikipedia:In_the_news/Candidates/December_2019#(Closed)_2019_Winter_Deaflympics and Wikipedia:In_the_news/Candidates/November_2025#2025_Summer_Deaflympics, you can understand how people were not much bothered to search about or give prominence for these kind of multi-sport events. I also understood that many Wikipedians did not have much idea about what Deaflympics really was and the lack of media coverage on Deaflympics also played a pivotal role. I am glad that at least you are trying to take up this stiff challenge and hope you can find success. Don't give up hope on this and I hope that I can try to support you in this despite my current editing restrictions. I would love to once again contribute to Wikipedia editing, but only time will tell. Abishe (talk) 08:02, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

Well, I noticed it too. So, I also stopped giving importance to the WikiProject. TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 08:22, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

It's worth a read. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 12:08, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

Why, Can you explain. TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 12:22, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

Don't go to an LTA's talk page and talk to them. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 12:25, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

Okay, well he was using rude words, so I thought it would be great if he stopped using them. TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 12:26, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

Anyway, thanks, I'll definitely check it out. TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 12:27, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

Hello there, this isn't a big issue, but I noticed something. When you moved the Adv Owais Pechkar article back to the draft space, you forgot to leave a speedy deletion tag on the left over redirect. it's not a big issue and only took a second to fix, but it's one of those things that people sometimes forget to do, so I wanted to let you know. Happy editing - Pyrrhic victor (talk) 13:05, 13 May 2026 (UTC)

Thanks bro. I'll do it next time. TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 13:06, 13 May 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article Sheep farming in Ukraine is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of AirshipJungleman29 -- AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 23:25, 13 May 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article Sheep farming in Ukraine has failed. See the review page for more information. If or when the reviewer's feedback has been addressed, you may nominate the article again. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of AirshipJungleman29 -- AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 23:45, 13 May 2026 (UTC)

On 14 May 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sheep farming in Ukraine, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that sheep farming in Ukraine declined from 6.4 million sheep in 1938 to about 0.7 million in the early 21st century? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sheep farming in Ukraine. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Sheep farming in Ukraine), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

Quick facts

story · music · places

Close

Thank you for a good one, and for improving article quality in May! - Today: Felicity Lott. If you have little time, just give me a click ;) - If you have more, see her story. If you have more, listen to her singing Friendly Vision. If you have more, listen until she sings the word "peace" (Frieden), floating up high, serenely. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:15, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

Good article nominations | June 2026 Backlog Drive
June 2026 Backlog Drive: Do you want to become more experienced in the GA process? On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles reviewed. Mentors are available, and new reviewers (<6 reviews) get bonus points! Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talk page.
You're receiving this message because you have participated in a good article review this year or participated in the previous backlog drive.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:59, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of Sheep farming in Ukraine at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:22, 30 May 2026 (UTC)

Can you check the nomination TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 03:27, 31 May 2026 (UTC)

When you revert vandalism, you need to warn the editor in question. Otherwise, it's hard for them to understand why their edit was reverted. --TheAuroraBorealis (she/they | In solidarity) 21:34, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

Did you mean the Russian empire guy. TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 21:42, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

Waldemar Haffkine TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 21:43, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

Yes I meant them. Regardless of their intentions, it is always a good idea to warn them. --TheAuroraBorealis (she/they | In solidarity) 21:48, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

Well, even though Haffkine was ethnically Ukrainian, he was born in the Russian Empire. TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 21:50, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

been following this too, it may also be productive to have a chat with the other user on their talk page to avoid further edit warring, even if the edits are pending revision InRRainbows Lets chat! 21:49, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

Well, I am going to tell that user. TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 21:51, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

good! there has also been previous discussion of this exact issue on the talk page, which may be helpful for explaining why we use certain standards on wikipedia :) InRRainbows Lets chat! 21:52, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

I'd see that before rejecting it. TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 21:54, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

i figured! just think it would be constructive for the other user to see if they understand that this is not some kind of personal issue, but rather one with precedent. thanks for starting the discussion InRRainbows Lets chat! 21:55, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

👍 TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 21:56, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

Hi there, TheGreatEditor024, and welcome to Women in Red. It's good to see you intend to help us improve Wikipedia's coverage of women. When writing women's biographies, you'll find some useful tips in our Ten Simple Rules. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 09:46, 2 June 2026 (UTC)

Hi TheGreatEditor024, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the new page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to the page curation tools and can start patrolling pages from the new pages feed. If you asked for this at requests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.

This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at Wikipedia:New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:

• Add Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers to your watchlist to follow NPP-related discussions
• If you use Twinkle, configure it to log your CSDs and PRODs
• If you can read any languages other than English, add yourself to the list of reviewers with language proficiencies

You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone! _signed, Rosguill ^talk 00:28, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

I wanted to say that I won't be active a lot this month as I am joining a new university and I am moving from my state to another one. I kinda forgot about it when I posted the request. Sorry. TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 06:22, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to ColanXP. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and reliable sources to properly support the content. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:43, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

I guess you are mistaken. The only contribution I did was adding an orphan tag to the article (draft).TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 13:47, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

Are you using Twinkle to tag pages? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:52, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

Nope, I use Special:NewPagesFeed. TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 13:54, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

No, I mean how do you apply the template? Do you do it manually by editing the source, or do you use some sort of tool like Twinkle? I'm trying to understand the work flow that resulted in you marking this ColanXP article as patrolled. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:56, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

manually using {{uncategorized}} and {{orphan}} TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 13:57, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

And having manually applied the template, did you then click the review button (Y) on the Page Curation toolbar? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:05, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

Yes TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 14:06, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

And did you think the article was ready for the main space? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:09, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

Well, I felt like it was not ready, but I thought that other editors make see it as a stub, so I just reviewed it. well, I really need some confidence. TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 14:14, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

I guess I have to read WP:BOLD again TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 14:14, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

It isn't a stub. And even if it were, that wouldn't matter: stubs are subject to the exact same notability and verifiability requirements as any other article.

This article cites 3x Twitter/X and 1x blog. None of these are reliable sources. What's more, the vast majority of the information is completely unreferenced. And because of this, there is also no evidence at all that the subject is in any way notable. For these reasons, the article is emphatically not ready to be published.

New Page Patrol is an important job and comes with great responsibility. It is the last line of defence, before a new article gets released to public consumption (and also becomes available to search engines). Once NPP has signed off an article, no other quality control is applied. Therefore NPP should only approve articles that are ready to be approved. By clicking on the review button, that is you saying this article is 'good to go', and that removes it from the NPP feed so no other reviewer will look at it. I only happened to catch this one, because that page was already on my watch list because of some previous issues I've been dealing with.

Sorry, I'm not having a go at you, I'm genuinely trying to help. It's really great that you've volunteered to work on NPP, we sure need help there (!), but please be careful with the reviewer permission, it is a powerful one. Only approve articles that you really mean to approve, and if you're not sure about anything, don't hesitate to ask (either me or any other admin or NPP'er).

Happy edi... I mean, reviewing! :) -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:26, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

Okay, I'll be really careful next time. tbh I though the review button was just like "I saw it". I am really sorry. TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 14:31, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

No problem, I'm sure you didn't do it on purpose. We all make mistakes (I sure do!), but that's great because that's how we learn. Like now you learned that the Y button means 'reviewed', and I learned that the hover text displayed over that button perhaps needs to be clearer. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:37, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

btw I really have a doubt. Like what is that gray box with a heart a delete button, etc beside my screen when I review an article. And how to use it. TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 14:40, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

That is the Page Curation toolbar, which becomes available to you when you get the NPP permission, see Page Curation/Help which tells you in broad terms how to use it. Or if you want to learn more thoroughly (highly recommended!), you can go to New pages patrol/School and sign up for some 1:1 training. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:48, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

Thank you TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 14:49, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

Hi, I’m wondering why you accepted this edit, made by a TA and making changes without providing a reliable source? Indeed if you look at the history, they’ve been edit warring this change for the past few days… Danners430 _{tweaks made} 09:36, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

Unaccepted. Well, I kinda messed up. Will be careful next time. Thank you for noticing it. TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 10:08, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

Hello @Materialscientist, It seems like you have blocked my IP address, on charges that my account uses a VPN or another similar proxy service. But, I don't use them. I'd really appreciate if you could explain why you felt like that, or can you provide the source. TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 13:06, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

@Materialscientist Hey, can you respond TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 15:46, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheGreatEditor024 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

Yamla responded in the UTRS appeal that my IP address belongs to ProtonVPN, but I am not using a VPN nor any other similar proxies. I am currently accessing Wikipedia using the hostel Wi-Fi. How do I solve this issue.

Decline reason:

No longer blocked. voorts (talk/contributions) 23:47, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 16:49, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

I can edit now TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 17:41, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

Hello. It appears you attempted to move Scent of Time (TV Series 2023) to draftspace, but instead moved the page Scent of Time. I'm not entirely sure what happened here. I'm guessing you moved a redirect instead of the actual article? --Gert7 (talk · contribs) 20:32, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

Well, I moved the page Scent of Time because it contained many issues. TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 03:43, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheGreatEditor024 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

Caught by a web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. I am currently using the hostel Wi-Fi, I don't understand why I can't edit when I am using my hostel Wi-Fi, but I can edit normally when I am using mobile data. TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 11:22, 12 June 2026 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You don't give the IP address involved, but the hostel is probably using a webhost or proxy for its internet access. It is not permitted to edit via a webhost/proxy(though merely reading Wikipedia is not affected). You'll need to keep using your mobile data to edit. 331dot (talk) 15:02, 12 June 2026 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Okay TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 12:11, 13 June 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for improving article quality in June! -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:19, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

	A barnstar for you!
	Thank you for being part of the fight against vandalism on English Wikipedia, and being one of the top five most active pending changes reviewers in the last 30 days. Your hard work is very much appreciated, please keep it up. – Destinyokhiria (talk / cont) 01:25, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

Thank you so much TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 06:19, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

Didn't expect a barnstar btw, well its my first time reviewing. TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 06:22, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

Hi, this is an automated reminder as part of Global reminder bot to let you know that your permission "patroller" (New page reviewers) will expire on 00:00, 4 July 2026 (UTC). For most rights, you will need to renew at WP:PERM, unless you have been told otherwise when your right was approved. To opt out of user right expiry notifications, add yourself to m:Global reminder bot/Exclusion. Leaderbot (talk) 19:41, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

Women in Red | July 2026, Vol 12, Issue 7, Nos 358, 359, 376, 377 Events: New: Crime & law | Alphabet run: Countries starting with M Continuing (year-long initiatives): #1day1woman | Sports Announcements, tips, participation... Announcements from other communities: Women in Red celebrates its 11 Year Anniversary on July 18! Eiffel women Developing Countries WikiContest Tip of the month: Working on a group of linked articles? Have you thought about creating a navigation box for the footer of those pages? Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram & Pinterest

--MSGJ (talk 22:16, 28 June 2026 (UTC) via MassMessaging