User talk:AndrewPeterT

The redirect List of storms named Jeana has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 August 9 § List of storms named Jeana until a consensus is reached. CycloneYoris ^talk! 03:32, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

Hey there, I saw you’ve been adding lots of hat notes to the storm sections in the season article. I don’t think they’re necessary, they just clutter up the sections. In the case when a storm name redirects to a season article and there’s potential for ambiguity, readers will find it in the search bar. Hurricanehink mobile (talk) 21:19, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hurricane Francine (2024), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgia.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:52, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Royal descendants of Queen Victoria and of King Christian IX, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Consort.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:59, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

On 4 October 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article William, Prince of Wales, in film and television, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that William, Prince of Wales, inspired the character of Prince Wheeliam in Cars 2? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/William, Prince of Wales in film and television. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, William, Prince of Wales, in film and television), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 4 October 2024 (UTC)

		The Special Barnstar
		I highly appreciate your calm and civility. Many editors would have attacked a reviewer after their "oppose". Please keep working for our community. I hope next time I will support. Borsoka (talk) 02:15, 2 November 2024 (UTC)

Thank you very much for the barnstar, Borsoka. I have appreciated your insight, and I hope that you will be able to comment on something else I nominate in the future. AndrewPeterT (talk) (contribs) 02:33, 2 November 2024 (UTC)

I'm already grateful for your contributions to the Annual Report, so can you please help provide some write-ups to the pending weekly one? No problem if you want to write only about the entries that interest you. igordebraga ≠ 06:07, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for your message, Igordebraga. I have crafted entries for the remaining write-ups of the linked report. Apologies for the delay in response; I have been busy off-wiki. AndrewPeterT (talk) (contribs) 17:58, 26 December 2024 (UTC)

Nearly one year later, asking you to contribute to the newest one if possible. igordebraga ≠ 13:02, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

Can you please help with the latest one? igordebraga ≠ 07:19, 14 December 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of female justice ministers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ministry of Justice and Human Rights.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 1 March 2025 (UTC)

Wishing you peace, joy, and renewal this Easter season. Thank you for all you do to keep Wikipedia growing and thriving. Stay well, and happy editing! MSincccc (talk) 08:18, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lady May Abel Smith, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lady Mary Cambridge.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 18 May 2025 (UTC)

The article List of official overseas trips made by William, Prince of Wales, and Catherine, Princess of Wales has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I am sorry, but this seems implausible, I don't think people will be typing in such a long winded search term to find this disambiguation page.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Govvy (talk) 20:48, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

Hi, AndrewPeterT. I'm just posting to let you know that Descendants of Christian IX of Denmark – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for November 14. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 21:19, 24 October 2025 (UTC)

Hello AndrewPeterT, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2026. Happy editing, Wishes from Vestrian24Bio

Click here to see the Christmas message I wrote...💞! Vestrian24Bio 13:13, 25 December 2025 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

AndrewPeterT,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Abishe (talk) 13:45, 31 December 2025 (UTC)

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 13:45, 31 December 2025 (UTC)

I saw your latest comment at Talk:Catherine, Princess of Wales. Yes, the topic has surfaced across multiple discussions, including for featured articles. One of them was this one regarding the omission of frontal commas on the FA Liz Truss. And yes, there have been multiple ones I have had with individual users as well, with most discussions making two things clear:

• Fronted commas need not be consistently omitted or used when with years, as was the discussion in most cases about.
• British English prefers to omit it after very short introductory phrases.

I have gone back and forth on this a number of times. Once, when it was suggested I drop them at a GA review and when many FAC regulars omitted it in their writing and then recently, when this discussion resurfaced and I had to add them back to a few articles I have a major interest in.

I hope my experience tells you something. Maybe one day, we can have an essay on it. I look forward to your experience response, if you have any. Thank you for reading it to the end. MSincccc (talk) 18:20, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Nathannah. A comment that you recently posted seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Editors should not use LLMs to write comments generatively. Communication is at the root of Wikipedia's decision-making process, and it is presumed that editors possess the ability to come up with their own ideas. Your comment may have been collapsed per the relevant guideline. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Nathannah • 📮 02:41, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

Descendants of Elizabeth II, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 4% of accepted submissions, excellent work! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

• See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.

Future articles

• Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

• Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

• Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
• Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
• You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
• Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
• The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
• For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

SomeoneDreaming (talk) 17:00, 17 May 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for writing such a detailed article. I left one comment on the Talk page, but overall, very impressed. SomeoneDreaming (talk) 17:13, 17 May 2026 (UTC)

Great work creating this article. I’ve also created some articles related to Elizabeth II this summer; among them is Elizabeth II: In Private. In Public. The Inside Story, whose DYK is currently on hold because of some unfinished prose. I just don’t have the time to fix it at the moment since my examinations run until the 28th.

Anyway, the page on the descendants is cool. I’d be interested to know what led you to creating this article. Keep contributing as you do. Best, MSincccc (talk) 10:12, 19 May 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for your comment and feedback. I have always been interested in the genealogy of European royalty (I even created a list that became a WP:FL, Descendants of Christian IX of Denmark). Moreover, I have read plenty of articles outside of Wikipedia on Elizabeth II's descendants. Consequently, I decided to create a list on the topic here on Wikipedia to appeal to that reader interest.

Good luck on your examinations. AndrewPeterT (talk) (contribs) 13:31, 19 May 2026 (UTC)

Thanks. I noticed that you've created an article on Diana's descendants as well. If you ever need another pair of eyes on it, I had be happy to help with copyedits or minor revisions. Also, feel free to add to the article on Jobson's biography; any contributions there would certainly be appreciated.

It is rather fascinating that I am hardly older than George himself and am taking his article through GAN. I still remember your GA review for Louis. Best, MSincccc (talk) 14:27, 19 May 2026 (UTC)

Hey, I saw you’ve added a ton of dablinks to the tops of articles. Some seem useful, but you don’t need to go overboard with every potential misspelling. I noticed the top of Hurricane Maria linked to Hurricane Martha unnecessarily, so I removed it. Hurricanehink mobile (talk) 17:00, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

On 23 June 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Descendants of Elizabeth II, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that all three sons of Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip attended Gordonstoun School? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Descendants of Elizabeth II. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Descendants of Elizabeth II), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

Launchballer 00:02, 23 June 2026 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Descendants of Charles III is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Descendants of Charles III until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may still edit the article, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:04, 16 July 2026 (UTC)

You opened a discussion at Wikipedia_talk:Vital_articles/Level_5/People/Authorities_and_leadership_figures#Swap_Anne_Boleyn_◎_5_with_Isabella_of_France_or_Margaret_of_Anjou. There are pending questions for you there.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 17:18, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

Yes, I have responded to those questions. AndrewPeterT (talk) (contribs) 18:30, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, AirshipJungleman29, left the following feedback:

This draft's references do not show that the event meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for events. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

• provide significant coverage: discuss the event in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
• show lasting significance: analysis published after the initial breaking news has passed, showing historical impact;
• are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
• are independent: not connected to the event, such as press releases, the event or organizers own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all four of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Article is overwhelmingly cited to Shawcross 2009, a non-independent source.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:List of official overseas trips made by Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 13:17, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

Hello, AndrewPeterT! Having a draft declined at Articles for creation can be disappointing, but don't be discouraged, it's common when creating your first article. Need help? For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know. To understand why your draft was declined, please read the reviewer's feedback and follow any links to help pages you've been given. If you're still confused, try asking for advice at the Articles for creation Help desk. For peer support regarding all other editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a friendly question and answer hub for new editors. We'd love to see you there! ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 13:17, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

@AndrewPeterT: This just came to my attention. I actually disagree with the conclusion reached here, but regardless, I do wonder if you have the ability to move the article to the main space yourself after some touches here and there. I can do it, but I think it would be better to address any potential issues that have been raised first. Keivan.f^Talk 21:28, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

@Keivan.f: Thank you for the message. Yes, I am able to move draft articles into mainspace. Regarding the issues raised, if you have access to any sources other than Shawcross 2009 that describe the Queen Mother's overseas visits, that would be greatly appreciated. AndrewPeterT (talk) (contribs) 23:15, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

I think you have done a terrific job citing Shawcross's book. That's the one that I would have used as well. I think what the reviewer wanted is perhaps coverage in other sources. I can dig up some more in newspaper archives and look for videos from British Pathé that documented her visits. There are plenty of those and they pretty much show that her visits were indeed notable and received coverage in the media. Keivan.f^Talk 23:38, 29 July 2026 (UTC)