Talk:Guitar Hero 5

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

More information Article milestones, Date ...
Former good articleGuitar Hero 5 was one of the Video games good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 6, 2008Candidate for speedy deletionDeleted
August 18, 2009Peer reviewReviewed
November 13, 2009Good article nomineeListed
January 23, 2010Featured topic candidatePromoted
April 3, 2025Featured topic removal candidateDemoted
October 8, 2025Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article
Close
More information Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks: ...
Close

Article review

It has been a while since this article have been reviewed, so I took a look and noticed lots of uncited statements, including entire paragraphs. Should this article go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 01:27, 16 August 2025 (UTC)

GA Reassessment

Guitar Hero 5

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: Delisted. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 09:51, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Uncited statements, including entire paragraphs. Z1720 (talk) 14:45, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

It seems like an easy enough fix; did you make sure to notify Masem ahead of time when you raised the issue on the 15th? - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 16:23, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
@Cukie Gherkin: While the GAR instructions ask editors to consider posting a notice on an article's talk page, it is not required, nor is contacting or pinging an editor prior to opening a GAR. Pinging and posting on user talk pages yield mixed results: some respond positively, some question why I did not fix it myself (which is a different discussion), some are annoyed that I pinged them and asked that I stop, and some don't respond. If anyone thinks notifying an editor before opening a GAR should be required, I invite them to open a thread at WT:GA. Note that I would probably oppose this as it adds another bureaucratic step to the GAR process, and I think if editors care about an article's status, they should maintain the article without prompts. Masem did receive a notice from the GAR helper script after this GAR was opened. Z1720 (talk) 17:11, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI