User talk:Lonniemitchell22
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
September 2018
Hello, I'm General Ization. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Talk:Bunk'd have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. General Ization Talk 17:13, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
March 2019
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Dora the Explorer (film) a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.
In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. This page should not be moved via the regular process either until a WP:RS is produced verifying the film's title change. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 12:39, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of Bizaardvark episodes, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Amaury (talk | contribs) 18:17, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
April 2019
Hello, I'm YoungForever. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Station 19, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — YoungForever(talk) 05:16, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at The Enemy Within (TV series), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. — YoungForever(talk) 05:34, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Template:Nickelodeon original series and Nicktoons. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. And Knight Squad and List of Knight Squad episodes. You need to learn how Wikipedia works or don't bother editing. Amaury (talk | contribs) 04:55, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Knight Squad. Amaury (talk | contribs) 04:56, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2018 in American television, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page TBS (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
May 2019
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at MasterChef Junior (U.S. season 7). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. SanAnMan (talk) 11:17, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
June 2019
Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of Queen of the South episodes, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. — YoungForever(talk) 03:17, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 13
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of original programs distributed by Facebook Watch, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mystery (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:33, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
June 2019
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Jett (TV series), did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — YoungForever(talk) 19:05, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 22
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of original programs distributed by Hulu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Light (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:07, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 29
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2019 in American television, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ian Edwards (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:49, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
July 2019
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to 2019 in American television, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.
It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Jessicapierce (talk) 16:42, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
2018–19 United States network television schedule
Well I want on the 2018–19 United States network television schedule that we have to wait until TVBuff90 comes in to help Tim Brooks to do the top 30. --2600:1700:4300:2C8F:E8E4:CE44:40C:7FCB (talk) 17:54, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 13
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of programs broadcast by HBO, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Deadline (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:32, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
Dates in cite templates
Hello. You recently changed the formatting in the cite web templates with this edit at Mr Inbetween. Access dates are sometimes different than dates of press releases in Wikipedia, and, in particular, Futon press releases only include the release dates in their URLs. Therefore, whenever I add their press releases to episode tables, I never use the date parameter, only the access-date one. I will thank you for not correcting these in the future. — Wyliepedia @ 09:41, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
Adding the new source about the third Walking Dead seeies
I was hesitant to add it in its 2020 in American television because I felt like a premiere approximation wasn’t enough new information to justify making it the second source. I was gonna wait for the title and add that article as the source. Should today’s source just be replaced by it when the time comes?--Simmerdon3448 (talk) 05:28, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
Search Party/Rick and Morty
I saw you did end up adding Search Party to programs returning in 2020. Its second season ended only a couple months after Rick and Morty, and in fact their upcoming seasons were ordered in April and May of last year respectively. Rick and Morty is infamous for its lengthy hiatuses at this point. Not only that, but animation takes time. I wanted to ask how you would handle it. I honestly don’t think Rick and Morty should be listed in the returning section for 2019, it just wouldn’t feel right, you know what I mean?--Simmerdon3448 (talk) 03:57, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
October 2019
Please stop your disruptive editing.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Charmed (2018 TV series), you may be blocked from editing. I am referring to the removal of the reliable source on the timeslot. — YoungForever(talk) 05:35, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
Ratings table
Do not unhide the next row in a ratings table simply because the episode has aired. The row remains empty except for duplicate information (the title and the date), and therefore has no use. Only display it once ratings information actually becomes available. -- /Alex/21 01:34, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
 | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
December 2019
Can you fix this for me? Draft:Hero Elementary Demond Anthony (talk) 13:57, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to The Moodys (American TV series), did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — YoungForever(talk) 06:10, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 13
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- 2020 in American television (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Variety
- Little America (TV series) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Variety
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:45, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
February 2020
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Magitroopa (talk) 20:23, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to List of 2020 American television debuts, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Magitroopa (talk) 15:45, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
I noticed your recent edit to List of original programs distributed by Amazon does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → 
Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary.
Thanks! Sundayclose (talk) 02:09, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
List of television series and films based on Image Comics publications
Can you help me to edit a page title List of television series and films based on Image Comics publications — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blackknight1234567890 (talk • contribs) 21:05, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 11
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of 2020 American television debuts, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Too Hot to Handle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:18, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 30
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Bachelor (American TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ABC-TV (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:40, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
May 2020
Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in List of One Day at a Time (2017 TV series) episodes. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. — YoungForever(talk) 02:31, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
June 2020
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Stargirl (TV series), did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please stop changing citation style on the grounds of personal preference. Per WP:CITEVAR, which states: Editors should not attempt to change an article's established citation style merely on the grounds of personal preference, to make it match other articles, or without first seeking consensus for the change.
— YoungForever(talk) 00:23, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Natalie Alyn Lind. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 04:03, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
The Race Factor Denier
They reverted again, so I reverted back. I don’t think they’re going to stop. Can we report them?--BaseFree (talk) 13:35, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
I think that's a plan. Lonniemitchell22 (talk) 14:15, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- I’ve made a section…that he’s already gotten to. If you want to chime in, I’d welcome it--BaseFree (talk) 14:25, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
June 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Stargirl (TV series), you may be blocked from editing. — YoungForever(talk) 21:14, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at List of programs broadcast by Nickelodeon. Magitroopa (talk) 18:14, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
http://s.thefutoncritic.com
- thefutoncritic.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • blacklist hits • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com
Do you have a conflict of interest to declare with thefutoncritic? OhNoitsJamie Talk 19:43, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
July 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at List of programs broadcast by Nickelodeon, you may be blocked from editing. You've been warned on this multiple times already. Please do citations correctly and use cite press release instead of cite web for press releases. Magitroopa (talk) 22:19, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Magitroopa (talk) 18:33, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style, as you did at Brec Bassinger. This is becoming tedious because you know what you are doing is wrong, based on previous reversions, but you continue to persist. Based on all the other warnings you've gotten lately, consider this a final warning. The next step is a noticeboard to seek a block. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 16:43, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
August 2020
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Danielle Panabaker. You continue to persistently edit against the MOS (esp. MOS:DATERANGE) despite being warned multiple times about this. Next stop is a notice board. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 05:23, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
Splitting discussion for Template:Netflix original ended series
An article that been involved with (Template:Netflix original ended series) has content that is proposed to be removed and moved to another article (Netflix original ended series (2019+)). If you are interested, please visit the discussion. Thank you. Terasail[Talk] 11:26, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
As a frequent contributor to the Netflix original ended series navbox template I am informing you of a split proposal.
October 2020
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Weakest Link (American game show). This is truly your final warning, as you've been warned way too many times already. Stop messing with references at your own leisure, next will be a noticeboard discussion. Magitroopa (talk) 23:52, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. livelikemusic (TALK!) 13:15, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Editing Category:BET+
A tag has been placed on Editing Category:BET+ requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
The category is located at Category:BET+; this was created by mistake.
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 18:58, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
Very Important
Can you stop Lil MyMy1234 she claiming about Fancy Nancy getting Season 4 is a lie may you do it? TheTelevisionAssiant (talk) 01:45, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
December 2020
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at The Outpost (TV series). You have a long list Level 4 warnings, and you think it's a good move to remove valid sourcing from an article?! Consider this your very last warning – your next stop is a noticeboard where I suspect several of us will be seeking a long block. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 21:33, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
ANI notice
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 12:10, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
December 2020
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 17:15, 9 December 2020 (UTC)See this ANI thread for context. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 17:15, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
Please unblock me
Lonniemitchell22 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)
Request reason:
User talk:The Blade of the Northern Lights I'm only trying to add more information. And I will try not to mess with any editing. Just please give me another chance Lonniemitchell22 (talk) 18:48, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. 331dot (talk) 19:14, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
331dot Don't worry, I won't cause any damage or disruption ever again. Lonniemitchell22 (talk) 19:16, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
- To demonstrate that, please explain what you did wrong, why you won't do it again, and what productive contributions you wish to make. Specifically, please address the points made in the ANI discussion(linked above) in another unblock request. Someone else will review it, for fairness. 331dot (talk) 19:19, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
Lonniemitchell22 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)
Request reason:
The Blade of the Northern Lights 331dot Magitroopa IJBall HeartGlow30797 Oshwah The reason I took off the reference in The Outpost (TV series) is because those season were over. I see other shows that don't have those references in previous seasons and only have them in their current seasons and wanted to give the same thing in The Outpost. But I should have asked first before doing that. The reason I do (Cite web) instead of (Cite news) or (Cite press release) is because I like it short, sweet and to the point. But I should have asked first before doing that. The reason for rearranging is because I like doing the cites like this: (Cite web last= first= title= url= work= date=). But I should have asked first before doing that. What I did wrong was not ask before I did any edits. I won't do it again because I realize that I'm not the only editor and I need to ask for permission before adding or changing something to a page. I would like for a page for an upcoming TV show or special to be added, to have more people contribute to adding programming to BET+ and have people add the upcoming programming to Discovery+. I've learned my lesson and I will work hard to make sure I prove it to you. Lonniemitchell22 (talk) 1:52 pm, 9 December 2020, Wednesday (8 days ago) (UTC−6)
Decline reason:
The reply to IJBall down-thread is a step in the right direction, but insufficient given the past history of warnings. I would suggest taking a few weeks' break, then come back and file a new unblock request that concisely demonstrates a clear understanding of WP:V and the relevant discussions at WT:TV signed, Rosguill talk 22:28, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Which means you don't understand WP:V, and have not read WT:TV, where we've had several discussions that sourcing should not be removed even after an episode(s) have aired (for a number of reasons). The rest of what you say above does not demonstrate to me that you have learned from past mistakes (yet). If you want to get unblocked, you're going to have to demonstrate a greater understanding of your mistakes than this – "other editors were mean to me" is not going to cut it in this case. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 20:31, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
- I'll also add in here... Honestly, the ordering of reference fields (the "Cite web last= first= title= url= work= date=" order you mentioned) is the least of my worries. I'd say that probably just comes down to preference, as well as just going by the order listed on the template page.
- I don't really understand the explanation of using "cite web" as opposed to "cite news"/"cite press release"- "because I like it short, sweet and to the point"? The point of different templates is to be using the correct one for the given situation, not just picking which you prefer. Most of the sources you use from The Futon Critic (such as this from this edit of yours) clearly states "[via press release from CBS]" at the top of it. That would mean Template:Cite press release is the best to use for it, as it states, "This Citation Style 1 template is used to create citations for press releases." I'm even confused by your July 2020 edit on Rugrats here where you are changing already-existing citations from
cite newstocite web. I've even previously warned you specifically regarding all of this- did you somehow miss it or just decide to ignore it? With that warning back from July and you still doing it up to now, it's clear you didn't change your editing habits/behavior from then.
- I don't really understand the explanation of using "cite web" as opposed to "cite news"/"cite press release"- "because I like it short, sweet and to the point"? The point of different templates is to be using the correct one for the given situation, not just picking which you prefer. Most of the sources you use from The Futon Critic (such as this from this edit of yours) clearly states "[via press release from CBS]" at the top of it. That would mean Template:Cite press release is the best to use for it, as it states, "This Citation Style 1 template is used to create citations for press releases." I'm even confused by your July 2020 edit on Rugrats here where you are changing already-existing citations from
- Regarding removing citations from pages, I've warned you multiple times on your talk page, and I'm sure a lot might've had to do with that. Here's a few edits I later had to revert back where you are removing multiple citations with no explanation whatsoever. Yes, there are certain things that don't explicitly require a source (such as common knowledge), but removing sources for things such as air/premiere dates is not helpful whatsoever. In regards to my previously linked edit in this paragraph (source removals from List of programs broadcast by Nickelodeon regarding Blue's Clues & You!)- yes, obviously now that it has aired, we know it premiered on November 11, 2019. However, it's entirely likely that not having the sources included there, a few years from now, someone can just change the date and then we no longer have any source to verify what the correct date is. That's why sources are used on Wikipedia in the first place- to help verify information, not just to have it be there and then get rid of it as soon as whatever it is has happened.
- Just looking at your talk page alone, it seems you've received 8 different 'final warnings' since the first in April 2019, I'm not quite sure how it's taken this long for something to be done about all of this. Also interesting to note that prior to today, your previous time replying to something here was back in June, despite the countless warnings you've received since then, now today is the first time since then you've decided to respond to any sort of warning, and seemingly only because this time it was a block instead. Magitroopa (talk) 21:08, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
IJBall I have read WT:TV and I finally understand WP:V. I finally realize the mistakes I made when it comes to editing. I really am sorry for the constant disrupting and if you unblock me I will do everything to prove to you guys that this behavior will never happen again. Lonniemitchell22 (talk) 05:26, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- I won't object to an unblocking at this point – but it has to be with the understanding that, 1) you will communicate going forward (as this has been one of the biggest issues with your editing), and 2) if you are reverted on something you will a) stop that kind of editing, and b) hopefully ask for clarification from whoever you reverted you so that you understand the issues behind the reversion. If you can stick to these behaviors going forward, you shouldn't be a "problematic editor" any longer. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 05:44, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- I can stick with them. Lonniemitchell22 (talk)
- Just a note that I'm fine with the discretion of whoever reviews the unblock, no matter what the decision. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 16:32, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- I can stick with them. Lonniemitchell22 (talk)
Lonniemitchell22 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)
Request reason:
I have read the WP:V and the relevant discussions at WT:TV and I finally understand how things work here. I will follow all the rules based on verifiability and WikiProject Television. If I have any questions, I will go straight to the administrators and ask them before I edit. I have really learned my lesson and I will not disappoint you guys again. Lonniemitchell22 (talk) 05:01, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
Accept reason:
I've unblocked you based on the discussion above, but please be aware that it will be much harder for you to talk your way out of a block a second time. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:40, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
American Idol results color template
Hello there my name is TVSGuy, and I share an interest in television and reality programs such as American Idol. As I am busy in real life, I may not be able to do any big-scale updates and right now, AI was left with an incomplete update for seasons 4-15 (FOX-era) changing of the color templates to match the ones similar to seasons 16 onwards (ABC-era). If time permits, could you take your time to change the color templates to follow Season 16's format (you can use that as a reference; Seasons 1-3 so far have also done but seasons 4-15 are not).
I tried calling for others to help or even post on a noticeboard but there was no response however. I seems to lose hope until the premiere of Season 19, and that's where I find some of that to look for help if possible. I am glad that if you can do so, please let me know and if you are available to work on for the remainder of the seasons.
Thanks for your appreciation to help! TVSGuy (talk) 16:15, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
access-date
accessdate or access-date is the date you access the url, not the date you think is the publish date and the Futon Critic never explicitly stated that is the date they posted it, so please stop adding the publish date and using it as the access-date. This is considered to be WP:SYNTH, part of WP:OR. For example, this is actually shows the published date at the top of the press release. The Futon Critic do not add posted date on TV listings press release themselves, for example , the published date is not on the TV listings press release itself. — YoungForever(talk) 04:22, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
