Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Albums and songs

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Albums and songs. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Adding a new AfD discussion
Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:
  1. Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
  2. You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Albums and songs|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.
There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.
Removing a closed AfD discussion
Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.
Other types of discussions
You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Albums and songs. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.
Further information
For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.


Purge page cache watch
Related deletion sorting

Albums and songs

Vince Vance & the Valiants


Vince Vance & the Valiants (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

3 sources are included the entire page, AllMusic source is generally unreliable (see WP:ALLMUSIC). Entire infobox is unsourced, albums section and charting part of the table is unsourced. shane (talk to me if you want!) 15:04, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

Night of the Living Shred


Night of the Living Shred (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

For the same reasons as discussed by myself and others at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guitar Dominance!, another album by the same musician. The musician does not have his own article which raises WP:A9 concerns, and a couple of brief reviews help a little but not enough to support an encyclopedic article on the album. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 15:53, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

Whether or not Stump is eligible for his own article, outside of the previous Alcatrazz, can be a different discussion and I'm not so sure about his individual notability. But since his article has now been created, I'm willing to accept a standard redirect of the two album articles to there. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 01:05, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

Cha Cha Cha (Bruno Mars song)


Cha Cha Cha (Bruno Mars song) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article created in a rush, filled with album reviews that lack any substance, most of them being one paragraph short.

Chart positions don't grant a song notability, plus they are top 30 and over.

No awards received and not independently released as a recording by several notable artists, bands, or groups. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 18:31, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

  • Merge to The Romantic (album). The charting does provide some notability, but there appears to be little coverage of the song independent of the album to substantiate it. Merge or redirect is fine. ← Metallurgist (talk) 04:27, 19 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Keep This idea that charts mean nothing and that three reviews are enough to sustain an article needs to end.--Markus WikiEditor (talk) 15:39, 20 March 2026 (UTC)
    I didn't say that charts mean nothing, only that they "don't grant a song notability" and they are non-revelant peaks top 30 and above. This wasn't exactly top 10 WW MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 21:23, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

God Was Showing Off


God Was Showing Off (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article created in a rush, filled with album reviews that lack any substance, most of them being one setence. Only Billboard and Shatter the Standards )reliability?) seems to go more in depth.

Chart positions don't grant a song notability, plus they are top 30 and over.

No awards received and not independently released as a recording by several notable artists, bands, or groups MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 18:37, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

The Wood of Morois


The Wood of Morois (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:NALBUM, only sources are discogs and self published. Orange sticker (talk) 08:45, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

ToBeFree, given no opposition, can we close this AfD by vandal? WidgetKid Converse 00:22, 19 March 2026 (UTC)
Probably, but I don't close deletion discussions as a matter of principle as I promised not to do so back in 2019 in my RfA. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 01:24, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

Guitar Dominance!


Guitar Dominance! (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing is notable about this entry. Artist is not notable. Album is not notable. Fails all music notability guidelines. Cannot find any RS. Maineartists (talk) 21:55, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Night of the Living Shred for an article on another album by the same musician. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 17:46, 19 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 22:04, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete Redirect to Joe Stump - Didn't find anything else anything besides the AllMusic review. The artist actually might be notable (many borderline notable solo albums) and normally non-notable albums should be redirected to artist article but in this case it should be deleted unless someone is willing to create the article. --Mika1h (talk) 23:15, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete. Not much of anything out there, and [this] doesn't cut it. Also no good redirect target, as artist not notable. WidgetKid Converse 04:11, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete - Per WP:A9 we can assume that if the musician has no article, then the notability of that person's albums should be viewed suspiciously unless there are significant pro reviews and other coverage. This album is only visible in the usual streaming services and minor websites where users can post their own reviews. The AllMusic review mentioned in the article helps and it is from a pro reviewer with editorial oversight, but it's just one possible source and more are necessary for an encyclopedic article. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 15:50, 19 March 2026 (UTC)
Now that an article on Stump has been created (see below), I can go with a standard redirect of both the album articles to there. I think Stump's individual notability (outside of Alcatrazz) needs to be examined too, but that can be a different discussion. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 01:07, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

List of Vocaloid songs


List of Vocaloid songs (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This list is fundamentally unmaintainable. My separate arguments are as follows:

  1. "Vocaloid songs" is not a simple category, but rather an impossibly broad one. Vocaloid is a software, closer to an instrument. Quite a popular one at that, with over 100 different characters/voicebanks. It is not a genre, nor is it a specific artist. In theory, a "List of songs using Vocaloid" can be argued as of broad as a category as "List of songs that use guitars" or "List of films edited using Adobe Premiere Pro". And even more broad than categories we've ruled out as too broad like "List of rock songs".
    1. And while I'm sure that, somehow, an WP:NLIST argument could be made, the broadness of this article is so large that I'd argue the page fails WP:INDISCRIMINATE, and there are better alternatives that I will outline below.
  2. The article, as is, has no clear inclusion criteria. It appears to be based on songs that we have individual articles for, judging by the terminology of "Notable songs". However, using Wikipedia slang in a mainspace article is asking for trouble. Whatever a "notable song" is jargon to a leeway reader. No attempt at what a "notable song" is is clarified to the reader. Furthermore, even if that were clarified, it likely would not have foundation in Wikipedia policy as any experienced editor should know that the threshold of receiving inclusion somewhere on Wikipedia is much lower than what is typically required for a standalone article. Unless we invoke WP:CSC, although I think that's something that'd have to come out of consensus, as opposed to this page's apparent mashing together of marginally related songs.
  3. There are better options to covering Vocaloid songs as a group, or particularly noteworthy ones. My initial thoughts point towards something like a list of songs using specific Vocaloids (e.g. "List of songs with Hatsune Miku"), which while still very broad would be much more maintainable (one voicebank versus over a hundred). Or, an article centered around the Niconico Vocaloid Songs Top 20 chart and then another article for songs that reached number-one on it, a format with far more precedent on Wikipedia (e.g. Mainstream Rock (chart) and List of Billboard Mainstream Rock number-one songs of the 2020s). A third option, though likely the least ideal, is a list of songs in a rhythm game focused around Vocaloid like Hatsune Miku: Project Diva, if we truly wanted to cover these songs somewhere.
  4. While I know that quality issues are not a reason for deletion in most cases, I would still like to point out that this article is relatively uninformative to the point where, even if ruled out as a notable concept, wouldn't have anything worth preserving. There are two sentences of original writing here; everything else is a copy paste of a song article's lead sentence. A category is more informative. λ NegativeMP1 01:37, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Lists. λ NegativeMP1 01:37, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete. Category:Vocaloid songs already exists, that should be good enough. 162 etc. (talk) 05:33, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Note: The main reason why i created this article is because I wanted to make sure there was a list of popular vocaloid songs which were popular enough to have SOME sources but not to have a full article. But user Discospinster decided to remove half of the article. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Vocaloid_songs&oldid=1325395412 I do take apology here for using YouTube as a source. Talk 11:02, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete: I agree with the nominator. This list could include anyone from Hatsune Miku, through Kanye West to Wendy Carlos. It is completely WP:INDISCRIMINATE. No criteria for inclusion is included in the article, which leaves the reader guessing as to what actually counts... 11WB (talk) 18:59, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete. Nominator has outlined the problems very well. As it stands, this list is WP:INDISCRIMINATE and extremely broad with no clear inclusion criteria. It is better suited to a category. If somebody wanted to make "List of songs in the Hatsune Miku: Project DIVA series" to make a better attempt at covering popular Vocaloid songs together, I think that might have enough sources to meet NLIST. MidnightMayhem (talk) 20:41, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Paprikaiser (talk) 22:10, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete - No reason for keeping this list. Azuredivay (talk) 20:47, 19 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete- Agree with nom's points, so that if a similar theme of 'listing' of songs utilizing the Vocaloid software, would be more mainainable in the long run as the library grows further.Lorraine Crane (talk) 00:37, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Super Stars '05 – Wibtada El Mishwar


Super Stars '05 – Wibtada El Mishwar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced since 2006. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NALBUM; redirect to SuperStar (Arabic TV series)#SuperStar 2 (2004) as an ATD? thejiujiangdragon 🔥🐉 03:38, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

Selam Podrinju


Selam Podrinju (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced since 2006. Fails WP:NALBUM and WP:GNG; redirect to Sateliti as an ATD? thejiujiangdragon 🔥🐉 03:32, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

Redirect to Sateliti as WP:ATD. WidgetKid Converse 23:24, 20 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Redirect-agree with nom s points, as an ATD, not finding enough SIGCOV for standalone notability.Lorraine Crane (talk) 01:37, 20 March 2026 (UTC)
Redirect to Sateliti. Nighfidelity (talk) 18:00, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

Girth (album)


Girth (album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced since November 2006. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSONG; Encyclopedia Metallum is not a reliable source. Can be redirected to Winter's Bane. thejiujiangdragon 🔥🐉 01:58, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

Stand Up (For the Champions)


Stand Up (For the Champions) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSIC; unsourced since October 2006. Can be redirected to Stand Up (Right Said Fred album) as a WP:ATD. thejiujiangdragon 🔥🐉 23:13, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Mirage (The Geminus album)


Mirage (The Geminus album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:TOOSOON; I'd redirect to the band bur their article has been draftified due to possinle lack of notability TheLongTone (talk) 16:10, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Gimme What I Don't Know (I Want)

Gimme What I Don't Know (I Want) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not seeing coverage of this outside of the album. Launchballer 23:17, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

  • Keep, no major changes since last deletion discussion. However if a consensus against keeping the page emerges this time, it should be redirected to The 20/20 Experience – 2 of 2 as an ATD. मल्ल (talk) 17:32, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Svartner (talk) 00:44, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Servite et contribuere (talk) 01:51, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Keep per WP:NSONG as it has charted. If sourcing is interpreted very liberally, one can argue that a few of the album reviews satisfy WP:100WORDS and that this is a GNG pass, that coverage of the song is confined to album reviews in itself is not a disqualifying factor. Finally, this page has a "Good Article" label, and I don't see how the deletion would improve the encyclopedia. Kelob2678 (talk) 19:55, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
Saying how an article should not be deleted because it improves the encyclopedia is an argument to avoid in deletion discussions. Being a GA also does not mean immunity from deletion: GAs, and even FAs, have been deleted or redirected/merged in the past for various reasons. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 23:40, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
The main policy-based argument is that it charted in South Korea, so it is reasonable to presume that there is some in-depth coverage in Korean; this presumption cannot be realistically rebutted, as there are no editors who are knowledgeable enough and have access to South Korean music media.
Regarding WP:ATA, I checked the essay and, to my surprise, it mentions GA only in two instances, both contain the implicit assumption that GAs are presumed notable: While comparing with other articles is not, in general, a convincing argument comparing with ... Good article ... makes a much more credible case. and If a user is disrupting the encyclopedia by ... continually nominating good articles for deletion. The GAs I saw deleted are usually about fictional characters, they have no SNG and, in general, AfD is harsh toward in-universe descriptions. An example of a recent AfD similar to this is Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mindful (song), which was kept even though the page failed NSONG, not to mention GNG. Kelob2678 (talk) 00:05, 19 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 20:26, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Keep found this discussion through the DYK nom. I initially intended to !vote delete, but Kelob2678 makes some good points which I haven't seen anyone comment against yet. I also don't see how this article's deletion would improve the project. Johnson524 21:03, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Keep: This idea that charts mean nothing and that three reviews are enough to sustain an article needs to stop. They do that with my article of the Aaron Carter's single "Sooner or Later", which was redirected.--Markus WikiEditor (talk) 15:41, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

Album and song proposed deletions


for occasional archiving

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI