Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Albums and songs

Cha Cha Cha (Bruno Mars song)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article created in a rush, filled with album reviews that lack any substance, most of them being one paragraph short.

Chart positions don't grant a song notability, plus they are top 30 and over.

No awards received and not independently released as a recording by several notable artists, bands, or groups. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 18:31, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:50, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
Comment: @MarioSoulTruthFan: Note that not all non-singles have to win awards to be notable. I will say that this is what MC-123 is known for, just overall creating music-related articles. No opinion, though. Red Shell Momentum 01:14, 19 March 2026 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music and United States of America. Red Shell Momentum 01:14, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

Merge to The Romantic (album). The charting does provide some notability, but there appears to be little coverage of the song independent of the album to substantiate it. Merge or redirect is fine. ← Metallurgist (talk) 04:27, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

God Was Showing Off

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article created in a rush, filled with album reviews that lack any substance, most of them being one setence. Only Billboard and Shatter the Standards )reliability?) seems to go more in depth.

Chart positions don't grant a song notability, plus they are top 30 and over.

No awards received and not independently released as a recording by several notable artists, bands, or groups MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 18:37, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:50, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

The Wood of Morois

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:NALBUM, only sources are discogs and self published. Orange sticker (talk) 08:45, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Orange sticker (talk) 08:45, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
Keep: I added a few more sources... There are numerous articles on wikipedia wit only ONE source so I don't understand why we deny this album exists? CarnalCAN (talk) 13:39, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
No one is denying the album exists, however to have an article on Wikipedia a subject must meet notability standards, in this case the ones set out in WP:NALBUM. Orange sticker (talk) 14:03, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

See WP:OTHERSTUFF. Cortador (talk) 15:41, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
Speedy delete per WP:A9. Author also has a strong recent history of vandalism. WidgetKid ^Converse 14:53, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
Delete per nom. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 20:30, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
Delete The album is an obvious hoax, probably created by me CarnalCAN (talk) 21:46, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

ToBeFree, given no opposition, can we close this AfD by vandal? WidgetKid ^Converse 00:22, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

Probably, but I don't close deletion discussions as a matter of principle as I promised not to do so back in 2019 in my RfA. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 01:24, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

Guitar Dominance!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing is notable about this entry. Artist is not notable. Album is not notable. Fails all music notability guidelines. Cannot find any RS. Maineartists (talk) 21:55, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:04, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
Delete - Didn't find anything else anything besides the AllMusic review. The artist actually might be notable (many borderline notable solo albums) and normally non-notable albums should be redirected to artist article but in this case it should be deleted unless someone is willing to create the article. --Mika1h (talk) 23:15, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
Delete. Not much of anything out there, and [this] doesn't cut it. Also no good redirect target, as artist not notable. WidgetKid ^Converse 04:11, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

List of Vocaloid songs

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This list is fundamentally unmaintainable. My separate arguments are as follows:

"Vocaloid songs" is not a simple category, but rather an impossibly broad one. Vocaloid is a software, closer to an instrument. Quite a popular one at that, with over 100 different characters/voicebanks. It is not a genre, nor is it a specific artist. In theory, a "List of songs using Vocaloid" can be argued as of broad as a category as "List of songs that use guitars" or "List of films edited using Adobe Premiere Pro". And even more broad than categories we've ruled out as too broad like "List of rock songs".
1. And while I'm sure that, somehow, an WP:NLIST argument could be made, the broadness of this article is so large that I'd argue the page fails WP:INDISCRIMINATE, and there are better alternatives that I will outline below.
The article, as is, has no clear inclusion criteria. It appears to be based on songs that we have individual articles for, judging by the terminology of "Notable songs". However, using Wikipedia slang in a mainspace article is asking for trouble. Whatever a "notable song" is jargon to a leeway reader. No attempt at what a "notable song" is is clarified to the reader. Furthermore, even if that were clarified, it likely would not have foundation in Wikipedia policy as any experienced editor should know that the threshold of receiving inclusion somewhere on Wikipedia is much lower than what is typically required for a standalone article. Unless we invoke WP:CSC, although I think that's something that'd have to come out of consensus, as opposed to this page's apparent mashing together of marginally related songs.
There are better options to covering Vocaloid songs as a group, or particularly noteworthy ones. My initial thoughts point towards something like a list of songs using specific Vocaloids (e.g. "List of songs with Hatsune Miku"), which while still very broad would be much more maintainable (one voicebank versus over a hundred). Or, an article centered around the Niconico Vocaloid Songs Top 20 chart and then another article for songs that reached number-one on it, a format with far more precedent on Wikipedia (e.g. Mainstream Rock (chart) and List of Billboard Mainstream Rock number-one songs of the 2020s). A third option, though likely the least ideal, is a list of songs in a rhythm game focused around Vocaloid like Hatsune Miku: Project Diva, if we truly wanted to cover these songs somewhere.
While I know that quality issues are not a reason for deletion in most cases, I would still like to point out that this article is relatively uninformative to the point where, even if ruled out as a notable concept, wouldn't have anything worth preserving. There are two sentences of original writing here; everything else is a copy paste of a song article's lead sentence. A category is more informative. λ NegativeMP1 01:37, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Lists. λ NegativeMP1 01:37, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
Delete. Category:Vocaloid songs already exists, that should be good enough. 162 etc. (talk) 05:33, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
Note: The main reason why i created this article is because I wanted to make sure there was a list of popular vocaloid songs which were popular enough to have SOME sources but not to have a full article. But user Discospinster decided to remove half of the article. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Vocaloid_songs&oldid=1325395412 I do take apology here for using YouTube as a source.
Plauzaric!
Talk 11:02, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Delete: I agree with the nominator. This list could include anyone from Hatsune Miku, through Kanye West to Wendy Carlos. It is completely WP:INDISCRIMINATE. No criteria for inclusion is included in the article, which leaves the reader guessing as to what actually counts... 11WB (talk) 18:59, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
Delete. Nominator has outlined the problems very well. As it stands, this list is WP:INDISCRIMINATE and extremely broad with no clear inclusion criteria. It is better suited to a category. If somebody wanted to make "List of songs in the Hatsune Miku: Project DIVA series" to make a better attempt at covering popular Vocaloid songs together, I think that might have enough sources to meet NLIST. MidnightMayhem (talk) 20:41, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
Delete per nom. Paprikaiser (talk) 22:10, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Super Stars '05 – Wibtada El Mishwar

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced since 2006. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NALBUM; redirect to SuperStar (Arabic TV series)#SuperStar 2 (2004) as an ATD? thejiujiangdragon 🔥🐉 03:38, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. thejiujiangdragon 🔥🐉 03:38, 15 March 2026 (UTC)
Redirect to SuperStar (Arabic TV series) as WP:ATD. WidgetKid ^Converse 04:50, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

Selam Podrinju

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced since 2006. Fails WP:NALBUM and WP:GNG; redirect to Sateliti as an ATD? thejiujiangdragon 🔥🐉 03:32, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Bosnia and Herzegovina. thejiujiangdragon 🔥🐉 03:32, 15 March 2026 (UTC)
Redirect per nomination. I think this is an uncontroversial redirect that could have been boldly done per WP:BLAR, but of course, soliciting input is good too! Dreamyshade (talk) 21:13, 15 March 2026 (UTC)
Delete. I could find no WP:SIGCOV. I would have said redirect, but the artist appears non-notable as well. I just created an AfD for that article. WidgetKid ^Converse 05:07, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

Girth (album)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced since November 2006. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSONG; Encyclopedia Metallum is not a reliable source. Can be redirected to Winter's Bane. thejiujiangdragon 🔥🐉 01:58, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs, Music, United States of America, and Ohio. thejiujiangdragon 🔥🐉 01:58, 15 March 2026 (UTC)
Comment: I only find Vampster [de]' review: Geschichte (talk) 20:07, 15 March 2026 (UTC)
Redirect to Winter's Bane#Discography as WP:ATD. There's almost no coverage of this album, just sources showing that WP:ITEXISTS or not WP:RS like WP:BLOGs. WidgetKid ^Converse 05:10, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

Stand Up (For the Champions)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSIC; unsourced since October 2006. Can be redirected to Stand Up (Right Said Fred album) as a WP:ATD. thejiujiangdragon 🔥🐉 23:13, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music, Sports, and United Kingdom. thejiujiangdragon 🔥🐉 23:13, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 23:19, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
Keep per my attempt at WP:HEY. Not sure if it's enough, but I found a few sources. It seems pretty well established that this is used by many sports teams and leagues around the world. WidgetKid ^Converse 01:06, 15 March 2026 (UTC)
Keep - assuming in good faith that they had an "ichiban" number 1 hit in Japan, the song passes. Bearian (talk) 03:23, 19 March 2026 (UTC)
Dang it, @Bearian, you had to say the magic word (ASSume ). I can't find an independent source to indicate they actually hit #1 in Japan. It's on all sorts of things published by the band, but it doesn't line-up with what's on List of Oricon number-one singles of 2002 (ref), nor on J-Wave's 2002 chart. Maybe most telling - the WP JP article doesn't have that fact. I think we may need to remove it from the article. WidgetKid ^Converse 04:16, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

Mirage (The Geminus album)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:TOOSOON; I'd redirect to the band bur their article has been draftified due to possinle lack of notability TheLongTone (talk) 16:10, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Spain. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:35, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
Delete - I can't find any WP:RS about this album Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:18, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
Delete due to lack of any independent coverage at all. No good redirect options as WP:ATD either. WidgetKid ^Converse 00:12, 15 March 2026 (UTC)
Delete Fails WP:NALBUM with what I can find. Iljhgtn (they/them · talk) 18:14, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

No Survivors (song)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not establish notability per WP:GNG or WP:NSONG. The only non-primary source cited is The Christian Beat, which is a fan news blog rather than a reliable, independent source providing significant coverage. The remaining references are primary or routine directory/database listings. Veggiegalaxy (talk) 02:36, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Veggiegalaxy (talk) 02:36, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs, Music, and United States of America. Red Shell Momentum 03:27, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Comment: Some new edits and sources were added since my nomination. The additional sources do not meaningfully change the notability assessment. The two K-Love pieces, while one is dedicated to the song, come from a Christian radio network with a promotional relationship to the artists it covers. Jesus Freak Hideout is a niche fan review site with questionable WP:RS status, and the piece is an album review rather than dedicated song coverage. Chart placements alone do not establish notability per WP:NSONG. The article still lacks substantive coverage in genuinely independent reliable sources. Veggiegalaxy (talk) 13:46, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Delete. The amount of notable information in this article could easily be summarized with a few words in the artist's main article. There's not enough significant coverage of the song in reliable sources to justify a separate article. Trumpetrep (talk) 14:48, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Redirect to Jeremy Camp discography, which I think would be most appropriate here. —JavaJourney (talk | contribs) 19:50, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Merge / Redirect to Jeremy Camp discography, as there are sources here, but none of the WP:SIGCOV needed to establish notability, and this is the best WP:ATD option under the circumstances. Alansohn (talk) 20:17, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Redirect to Jeremy Camp discography#Singles. The charting is a good start, but unfortunately everything else is WP:PROMO or WP:TRIVIALMENTION. WidgetKid ^Converse 01:36, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

The Witch (album)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced since 2005. Fails WP:GNG / WP:NALBUM.4meter4 (talk) 01:36, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. 4meter4 (talk) 01:36, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Delete as there are no sources here, none that I can find in a search and no target for a redirect. Alansohn (talk) 20:12, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Redirect to María Conchita Alonso#Discography as WP:ATD. I could find no WP:SIGCOV anywhere, just that WP:ITEXISTS. WidgetKid ^Converse 01:24, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
Redirect to María Conchita Alonso#Discography looks like an appropriate WP:ATD in the absence of reliable significant coverage. Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 14:12, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Practice What You Preach (Testament song)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested WP:BLAR. Refs #1-3 are database listings, ref #4 is a passing mention, it reads:

"The title track spawned a music video that received heavy rotation on MTV, which back then played music, as did another song from the album, "The Ballad."" Mika1h (talk) 17:16, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and California. Mika1h (talk) 17:16, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
Redirect to album. I could find no WP:SIGCOV in my WP:BEFORE, just lots about the album and tour. WidgetKid ^Converse 17:33, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
Based on the lack of more reliable sources, I say redirect this article to the album's article. Sure "Practice What You Preach" is one of Testament's well-known songs, but another reason it should be redirected (at least for now) is it never actually charted. UndergroundMan3000 (talk) 17:36, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
Redirect to album article. A search for the song turned up no WP:SIGCOV, just mentions of the same-named album, most of which didn't even discuss the song at all. ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 19:47, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
Redirect to Practice What You Preach, and again, for closers please a reminder to all to just mention the exact article title and don't just say "redirect to the album or something too generic like that. Iljhgtn (they/them · talk) 19:26, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Delete per nom. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 20:29, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

Sooner or Later (Aaron Carter song)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I had redirected to the album as WP:ATD. I couldn't find WP:SIGCOV of the song in multiple WP:RS to indicate passing of WP:NSONG, just one low charting in a single country and WP:TRIVIALMENTIONs. WidgetKid ^Converse 05:26, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. WidgetKid ^Converse 05:26, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
More info: From the talk page post-PROD, my take on if/how the current sources establish notability:

Vegas Creative YouTube: WP:PRIMARY, and maybe WP:PROMO.
Sanook: Primarily promotional / release-focused, not an in‑depth analysis.
Knox News: WP:TRIVIALMENTION
Entertainment Weekly: WP:TRIVIALMENTION (list)
AllMusic: WP:TRIVIALMENTION
Daily Orange: WP:TRIVIALMENTION
FIMI: Establishes charting
FIMI: Establishes charting (redundant with 7)
Golden Gate: WP:PROMO (published by producer)
RIAA: No mention of song
Broadway World: WP:TRIVIALMENTION
Ultatop: WP:TRIVIALMENTION
AppleMusic: WP:ITEXISTS
FIMI: Establishes gold cert (also redundant with 7 & 8)

Comment: I'll leave the notability assessment to others, but if this song is deemed non-notable, then the page should be redirected to Love (Aaron Carter EP) and not deleted altogether. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 15:16, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
@Another Believer Please review my comment below when you have the time. I believe my argument is correct, and I have also incorporated your sources, which means the article now includes additional reliable references. Markus WikiEditor (talk) 20:33, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

Agreed on the redirect to album instead of deletion. WidgetKid ^Converse 05:21, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

This LLM-generated text has been collapsed and should be excluded from assessments of consensus.

The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

Comment: I hope everyone is well. I believe the nomination of this article for deletion is, at the very least, misguided, and may stem from a misunderstanding of the difference between trivial mention and significant coverage as explained in Wikipedia:Notability. A trivial mention is something that adds no meaningful information and can be omitted without affecting the article. In this case, however, the sources cited are not trivial. For example, BroadwayWorld reports the streaming numbers the song achieved after its release, while Ultratop indicates that the track received a Tip status, meaning it did not enter the main chart but still showed measurable commercial activity. Both sources therefore address the song's commercial performance. Likewise, outlets such as Sanook, Knox News, Entertainment Weekly, AllMusic, and The Daily Orange provide critical commentary discussing the song's style, characteristics, and comparisons with other releases, which clearly constitutes meaningful coverage rather than a trivial reference.
It is also important to note that a source does not need to focus exclusively on the song in order to count as significant coverage; the guideline itself states that it "need not be the main topic of the source material". Additionally, a song does not need to be commercially successful to merit an article as long as it meets the notability criteria. For instance, the article about Madonna's EP Like a Virgin & Other Big Hits! is rated as a Good Article (GA-class) even though many of its references are simply verification sources, aside from the commercial performance section.--Markus WikiEditor (talk) 17:09, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

This LLM-generated text has been collapsed and should be excluded from assessments of consensus.

The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

Keep. The song clearly meets the notability criteria for songs and singles, as it has received significant coverage from multiple independent sources. The mentions in the references are not trivial; they include critics' analyses that discuss the song in context rather than simply mentioning it in passing. In total, the article cites 17 sources addressing relevant aspects of the track, and with the exception of the reference used to identify the music video's director (which comes from a YouTube video by Vegas, likely associated with Sony Music), the coverage comes from multiple, non-trivial, and independent published sources, which aligns with the notability standards.--Markus WikiEditor (talk) 20:18, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

I think it's better to include the points were I think you were wrong in your interpretation.

Sanook: (Not trivial.) An independent source discussing the release of the song and describing its style.
Knox News: (Not trivial.) An independent source in which a critic discusses the song’s style and gives their opinion on it.
Entertainment Weekly: (Not trivial.) An independent source in which a critic discusses the song’s style and gives their opinion on it.
AllMusic: (Not trivial.) An independent source in which a critic discusses the song’s style and gives their opinion on it.
Daily Orange: (Not trivial.) An independent source in which a critic discusses the song’s style and gives their opinion on it.
FIMI: Establishes charting
FIMI: Establishes charting (redundant with 7)
RIAA: No mention of song but since it was written in the article about it, the RIAA serves as a source for that statement.
Broadway World: (Not trivial) It reports the streaming numbers the song achieved after its release
Ultatop: (Not trivial) It reports the performance in Belgium (Tip).
FIMI: Establishes gold cert

— Note to closing admin: Markus WikiEditor (talk • contribs) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this AfD.

Keep The song clearly meets the notability criteria for songs and singles, as it has received significant coverage from multiple independent sources, thus satisfying WP:GNG. Furthermore, the song charted on a national sales chart for at least two weeks.TheWikiholic (talk) 20:14, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

— Note: An editor has expressed a concern that TheWikiholic (talk • contribs) has been canvassed to this discussion. (diff) WidgetKid ^Converse 00:29, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

I didn't even know this was forbidden. I sent him a message because I've seen him revert inflated claims many times and improve articles related to music, so I assumed he knows the criteria for notable records. I should have asked him if he could participate in the discussion instead. My bad. Markus WikiEditor (talk) 01:22, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Comment: Both the article as well as the first comment here by Markus WikiEditor are likely AI-generated. This is a pattern across their articles; see for instance this article, which contains what is almost certainly a chatbot response in Portuguese. Gnomingstuff (talk) 06:18, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Gnomingstuff, I have been noticing that LLMs like to include the names of the reviewers, whereas most editors don't. WidgetKid ^Converse 06:44, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
@Widgetkid Could you pointed out some other thing besides including the name of the reviewer that looks like ai in the article? Thank you. Markus WikiEditor (talk) 07:40, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

@Gnomingstuff All the articles I have seen on Wikipedia include the names of the reviewers, for example Madonna (album). I don't understand why this was labeled as AI-generated. I am trying to write in a straightforward manner in the article. Could you please explain what the problem is? Markus WikiEditor (talk) 07:31, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Please don't ping me multiple times about the same thing.

As far as why it was labeled as AI-generated, was it AI-generated? Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:42, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
As I told you here, I use it to improve some sentences, as I did here. I believe that in this way there should be no problem using ChatGPT or other tools. When you added the first tag on one of the articles, I thought you were saying that the entire article was AI-generated, also referring to possible hallucinated information and fictitious references, which did not happen in Sooner or Later or another article. The content was researched and the references are correct. I started writing in a more straightforward way, as in the Sooner or Later article, thus avoiding AI tags, but there was still an issue because, apparently, include the authors' names looks the article is "likely AI-generated". Markus WikiEditor (talk) 08:00, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Redirect to Love (Aaron Carter EP). Not a notable song, and charts and certifications do not make something automatically notable. NMUSIC is pretty clear about this, actually. If there is not significant coverage in reliable sources (which there doesn't seem to be), then this should not have an article. Red Shell Momentum 23:42, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
The reviews are not notable for you? The release mention in the article of Sanook, and the others I listed too? The NMUSIC said that significant coverage doesn’t mean the song has to be the main topic of the article. Anyway, these rules are strange. Certifications and chart positions end up being disregarded, but if an alternative band that no one cares about gets three reviews, the article is accepted. Markus WikiEditor (talk) 00:05, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SatnaamIN (talk) 08:52, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

redirect to the album. Source 1 is the only one that really talks about the song. Source 19 is simply a directory listing. Most of the reviews given are about the album, not this song. The album would seem to have more notability. Oaktree b (talk) 15:59, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Redirect to Love (Aaron Carter EP) as the preferred WP:ATD option here; I concur with the analysis of the sources cited above as not meeting WP:SIGCOV. Alansohn (talk) 21:10, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Gimme What I Don't Know (I Want)

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not seeing coverage of this outside of the album. Laun chba ller 23:17, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:39, 1 March 2026 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music and United States of America. Red Shell Momentum 23:43, 1 March 2026 (UTC)
Delete per nom; please ping me if sources to the contrary appear. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:05, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Keep, no major changes since last deletion discussion. However if a consensus against keeping the page emerges this time, it should be redirected to The 20/20 Experience – 2 of 2 as an ATD. मल्ल (talk) 17:32, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Svartner (talk) 00:44, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Servite et contribuere (talk) 01:51, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Keep per WP:NSONG as it has charted. If sourcing is interpreted very liberally, one can argue that a few of the album reviews satisfy WP:100WORDS and that this is a GNG pass, that coverage of the song is confined to album reviews in itself is not a disqualifying factor. Finally, this page has a "Good Article" label, and I don't see how the deletion would improve the encyclopedia. Kelob2678 (talk) 19:55, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Saying how an article should not be deleted because it improves the encyclopedia is an argument to avoid in deletion discussions. Being a GA also does not mean immunity from deletion: GAs, and even FAs, have been deleted or redirected/merged in the past for various reasons. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 23:40, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

The main policy-based argument is that it charted in South Korea, so it is reasonable to presume that there is some in-depth coverage in Korean; this presumption cannot be realistically rebutted, as there are no editors who are knowledgeable enough and have access to South Korean music media.

Regarding WP:ATA, I checked the essay and, to my surprise, it mentions GA only in two instances, both contain the implicit assumption that GAs are presumed notable: While comparing with other articles is not, in general, a convincing argument comparing with ... Good article ... makes a much more credible case. and If a user is disrupting the encyclopedia by ... continually nominating good articles for deletion. The GAs I saw deleted are usually about fictional characters, they have no SNG and, in general, AfD is harsh toward in-universe descriptions. An example of a recent AfD similar to this is Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mindful (song), which was kept even though the page failed NSONG, not to mention GNG. Kelob2678 (talk) 00:05, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

Delete per nom. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 20:26, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
Keep found this discussion through the DYK nom. I initially intended to !vote delete, but Kelob2678 makes some good points which I haven't seen anyone comment against yet. I also don't see how this article's deletion would improve the project. Johnson524 21:03, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

Pezzi della Sera

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Failed WP:NSONG. I couldn't find any coverage about this studio album. ROY is WAR Talk! 15:40, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs, Music, and Italy. ROY is WAR Talk! 15:40, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello!

Pezzi della Sera, as I'm sure you read in the article, is an album by Marco Castello, a musical artist that is becoming more and more important in Italy. I'll admit, he's not at a so high level of fame, but neither are many artists whose albums are listed in Wikipedia articles.

Thanks for taking care of Wikipedia!

Dre DrefromItaly (talk) 15:43, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

@DrefromItaly: why not create an article for Marco Castello then? I see your contributions are related to albums of the artist but not the artist himself. It's usually best to first create an article for the artist, and then for items of their discography if warranted. Skyshiftertalk 02:34, 11 February 2026 (UTC)

Honestly, I've thought about it. It all came down to the time I had available to work on Wikipedia lately. DrefromItaly (talk) 04:49, 11 February 2026 (UTC)

Delete per nomination. Marco may be gaining fame in Italy, but this article does not presently meet the notability guidelines.Trumpetrep (talk) 18:21, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

Keep Found these reviews . All four are bylined. Kelob2678 (talk) 22:12, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Svartner (talk) 03:56, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:23, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

delete I don't see notability for this album, no charted singles, no critical reviews. The one source is more about the person than this album. The individual MIGHT be notable, this musical album isn't. Oaktree b (talk) 14:05, 25 February 2026 (UTC)
Comment If there are concerns about the reliability of the reviews, there are reviews from Ondarock and Rockit (website) [it]. Both outlets have existed for more than two decades and have received some third-party notice. Kelob2678 (talk) 16:01, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Gommeh ^{(talk! sign!)} 17:18, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

Keep: I think @Kelob2678: should include the reviews he found in the article.--Markus WikiEditor (talk) 01:59, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Leaning Delete-finding multiple reviews like 43, 44, 45, 46, but most seems to be either customer reviews or actual reviews but does not demonstrate anything particularly notable like awards or achievements, leaving it here nevertheless for those more familiar with the genre. Redirect to the musician is not yet possible as no article yet has been made. Lorraine Crane (talk) 06:16, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
@Lorraine Crane:, If reviews are present, why can this not be kept? There is no need for an album to win awards to have a Wikipedia page. Kelob2678 (talk) 08:38, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Keep, passes GNG per multiple bylined reviews linked above, such as those from Ondarock and Rockit. Side note, based on the relevant Italian Wikipedia page and a cursory search, the artist easily passes GNG even beyond reviews (, , , and so on). I'll probably create a page about him later. Cavarrone 10:09, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Keep — Multiple independent reviews cited above make this album meets WP:GNG. Pridemanty (talk) 08:49, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: In the spirit of IAR and RELIST, the latter of which does note that discussions can be relisted for a third (or further) time (emphasis added), I'm relisting for a final time instead of closing as "no consensus". I think closure is still premature given that there has been no significant analysis of the arguement for GNG proposed by Kelob2678. Trumpetrep and Royiswariii: as those who commented before they could see the proposed sources, could we please have some analysis in order to find a concerte consensus, or a concrete lack thereof, and put this to bed for good?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, UpTheOctave! • 8^va? 18:05, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Nothing in the discussion has changed my opinion of the nomination. Trumpetrep (talk) 18:22, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Keep the Ondarock and Rockit sources are sufficient in my view, passes WP:GNG. Skyshiftertalk 20:28, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Keep per Kelob2678 and Cavarrone's review finding. Having reviews from reliable sources are enough to pass notability. The page should survive at AfD now. --SatnaamIN (talk) 03:36, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Albums and songs

Albums and songs

Cha Cha Cha (Bruno Mars song)

God Was Showing Off

The Wood of Morois

Guitar Dominance!

List of Vocaloid songs

Super Stars '05 – Wibtada El Mishwar

Selam Podrinju

Girth (album)

Stand Up (For the Champions)

Mirage (The Geminus album)

No Survivors (song)

The Witch (album)

Practice What You Preach (Testament song)

Sooner or Later (Aaron Carter song)

Gimme What I Don't Know (I Want)

Pezzi della Sera

Album and song proposed deletions

Related Articles