Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Companies

I have created a new page about the italian company qc Terme and i woukd greatly appreciate your help in reviewing it.I need the page to be approved by December 31st. The draft is called Draft:QC_Terme . I would be grateful for any feedback or suggestions to make the article acceptable for publication.

Hello WikiProject Companies editors. There is a request at Talk:Better.com#Funding_summary if editors care to review it. Disclosure: I am an employee at Better (Better Home & Finance Holding Company). KC at Better (talk) 17:43, 9 December 2025 (UTC)

Answered on the talk page. --CNMall41 (talk) 07:29, 21 December 2025 (UTC)

Hi editors, I have a COI request to update financials in the JBS N.V. article that may be of interest to folks here. I would appreciate any feedback! Hailey at JBS (talk) 18:33, 15 December 2025 (UTC)

Answered on the talk page. --CNMall41 (talk) 07:15, 21 December 2025 (UTC)

I’ve drafted an article on Joris Ide in Draft space and would appreciate any feedback from editors familiar with construction or building materials companies. Draft:Joris Ide AlexisJRI (talk) 08:55, 16 December 2025 (UTC)

@AlexisJRI:, if you are looking for a review, you will need to click the "submit draft" button near the top of the draft. I did give it a quick look and will tell you it would not pass as the sources do not meet WP:ORGCRIT. Have a look at WP:CORPDEPTH and try to find sources that match that criteria. This is how to show notability in Wikipedia. Also, if you used ChatGTP or another AI-program for assistance, please review it carefully to ensure it is accurate. --CNMall41 (talk) 06:58, 21 December 2025 (UTC)

@CNMall41: Thanks for the review. I’ve updated the draft to address WP:ORGCRIT/WP:CORPDEPTH by adding multiple independent secondary sources (e.g., national and trade business coverage of the 2015 acquisition) and reducing reliance on primary/company sources. I’ve also cleaned up formatting (duplicate References removed). Would you be willing to take another look?

AlexisJRI (talk) 00:24, 23 December 2025 (UTC)

Appears that someone has already reviewed the submission. For any discussion of the content going forward, please use the talk page of the draft so that it is kept in a central location. --CNMall41 (talk) 03:32, 23 December 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm an employee at Harmony Public Schools, a network of charter schools that operates across the state of Texas. I've placed an edit request to update the article's History section and need someone without a conflict of interest to review it. The request is fairly modest. I'm seeking to improve sourcing of existing content and add a few details about Harmony's early history as well as its growth over the past two decades. If that interests anyone at this WikiProject, you can view my request by following this link. Any help or guidance independent editors can provide would be much appreciated. Thanks! JB for Harmony (talk) 13:33, 19 December 2025 (UTC)

@JB for Harmony:, If no one gets around to reviewing, you can ping me in a week or so and I will have a look. Taking a quick look at the page itself, there are quite a few issues that need addressed such as removal of most of the awards as well as the entire section on superintendents which is basically a list of locations. The criticism information also needs to be included elsewhere on the page instead of separate WP:CSECTION. --CNMall41 (talk) 06:52, 21 December 2025 (UTC)

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:B&M#Requested move 24 December 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Vestrian24Bio 02:34, 31 December 2025 (UTC)

I work for Annovis Bio, Inc. (NYSE: ANVS) and would like to request that an independent editor create an article about the company. I'm disclosing my affiliation per COI guidelines.

Why it's notable: 1. Publicly traded on NYSE since 2020 (ticker: ANVS) https://www.nyse.com/quote/XNYS:ANVS 2. Late-stage clinical biotech with Phase 3 trials in Alzheimer's and Parkinson's 3. Coverage in peer-reviewed journals and financial media

RELIABLE SOURCES: 1. SEC Filings: https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0001477845&owner=include&count=40 2. ClinicalTrials.gov entries: NCT06709014, NCT05357989, NCT07284784, NCT05686044 3. ALZFORUM database: https://www.alzforum.org/therapeutics/buntanetap 4. NeurologyLive: "Buntanetap Improves Motor, Nonmotor and Cognitive Symptoms of Parkinson Disease in Phase 3 Study" (Jan 2025) 5. Philadelphia Business Journal: https://www.bizjournals.com/philadelphia/news/2021/05/21/annovis-bio-berwyn-alzheimers-parkinsons.html 6. Clinical Trials Arena: https://www.clinicaltrialsarena.com/news/annovis-subject-alzheimers-trial/ 7. Parkinson's News Today: https://parkinsonsnewstoday.com/buntanetap-parkinsons-disease/ 8. Longevity Technology: https://longevity.technology/news/new-trial-data-supports-alzheimers-drug-candidates-disease-modyfing-potential/ 9. Benzinga: https://www.benzinga.com/news/health-care/25/11/48905832/annovis-bio-stock-jumps-as-new-data-shows-buntanetap-halts-cognitive-decline-in-parkinsons-patients?gc_id=23299677066&g_special_campaign=true&gad_source=1&gad_campaignid=23299679256&gbraid=0AAAAADMUQ_YRoIoL2F_n7A3i6bv5eDgSK&gclid=Cj0KCQiAgvPKBhCxARIsAOlK_Epdb33yLlOCnzO-CMQ7_vJzZHK-7v3o3tUX7jpb3bPJI3PtlXuAYcoaAhlJEALw_wcB

10. Additional peer-reviewed publications available:

• https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36641607/
• https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38970127/
• https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41008606/
• https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38785991/
• https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32975365/
• https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29955650/
• https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30906671/

DRAFT AVAILABLE: I have prepared a neutral draft and comprehensive source list that I can share with any editor who picks up this request. The draft follows Wikipedia guidelines for tone and sourcing. Thank you for considering this request. Please let me know if you need additional information or sources. Sergeevich92 (talk) 16:47, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

@Sergeevich92:, I do not see a link to the draft you have prepared. However, I did find this which is still something you have a conflict of interest with since it is related to the company. Would suggest using the WP:COIREQUEST method moving forward. Once you have the drat ready, you can ping me here and I will take a look for you. --CNMall41 (talk) 21:45, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

@Sergeevich92:, Unfortunately, that is not how it is done. Please do not copy and paste large amounts of draft text into a talk page message. I created Draft:Annovis Bio for you where you can work on the draft until you feel it is ready for review. I would also suggest reading WP:CIR as it is up to you to create the draft according to Wikipedia guidelines. --CNMall41 (talk) 19:33, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Talk:Hotels.com#Arsenal_F.C. Someone representing Expedia Group/Hotels.com is requesting the re-addition of this statement I removed: "In 2023, Hotels.com became a multi-year sponsor of Arsenal's men's and women's teams." Sourced to https://www.90min.com/posts/arsenal-announce-multi-year-partnership-with-hotels-com which is quite rich in comments from Arsenal's as well as Hotels.com/Expedia associated sources. Sports teams and corporations form collaborative marketing and partnerships all the time. The question is whether such inclusion here has encyclopedic merit. I would appreciate editor opinions on this at the talk page. Graywalls (talk) 01:40, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

@Graywalls:, Coming here from the talk page of Hotels.com. I honestly do not have an opinion about adding it back or not as I don't know if there is real encyclopedic value or not. Just wanted to comment about the inclusion of sponsorships. I normally lean towards them being promotional and keep them off company pages per WP:NOTEVERYTHING. However, I normally don't see an issue if the company is well known for them. An example would be Coca-Cola and Microsoft. I think the better example to use for inclusion criteria would be Microsoft that gives more of a general summary than an indiscriminate list. --CNMall41 (talk) 03:30, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

I think if there are reliable sources that discuss about it and not written with extensive direct quotes from any of the involved partners, it would be worth mentioning. Otherwise, including it because the partner is a "big wig known name" is too arbitrary. Graywalls (talk) 03:33, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

I would agree with you there. I just wanted to make sure there was a distinction between what is going on with Hotels.com and sponsorships in general. Looking closer, I don't think there is encyclopedic value on the Hotels.com page but don't want to suggest we always keep them off company pages as sometimes they are. Maybe it would be different for Hotels.com if this were some type of naming rights such as Crypto.com and Crypto.com Arena (although Crypto.com could use a trim of most of its sponsorship information outside of the arena information). --CNMall41 (talk) 03:50, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

Looked at Crypto.com and trimmed back some there too. I believe it looks like an excuse to feature names bigger, more recognizable and prestigious than the article's company. While some partnerships/sponsorships are notable, many are WP:DOGBITESMAN and each and every A-list celebrity involvement need not be introduced into the article, but what to include or not include is a wide gray area subject to editor consensus beyond just power flashing big name sources and big name involved parties. Graywalls (talk) 12:11, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

I honestly think there should be more trimming but won't disturb the page since you are already editing there.

Sponsorships such as these can go away in favor of short summaries saying they sponsor professional and collegiate sports teams. Things like this is what we want to avoid as they are promotional and only serve the company. --CNMall41 (talk) 03:54, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

https://www.cnbc.com/2021/06/11/airbnb-and-vrbo-are-teaming-up-to-shut-down-repeat-party-house-offenders.html this kind of partnership would be more contextually relevant than things like NASCAR sponsorship, sports team partnership etc. That example is something that uses quotes, but still includes a fair bit of writing from the journalist. Graywalls (talk) 05:45, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

I agree there as well. I think the takeaways here are that some cases are clearly promo, some are not, but many fall into a "wide gray area subject to editor consensus." Hotels.com likely falls into the third category and I don't see consensus to the addition at this point. --CNMall41 (talk) 19:16, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:PNY Technologies#Requested move 6 January 2026 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Vestrian24Bio 08:25, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello WikiProject Companies!

I have a request on the Talk page for Preply. Currently, the article has some incorrect information about the company's headquarters. This request, in part, seeks to fix this. I am a paid representative so I make requests rather than directly edit. Let me know if you have any questions. Cristina Preply (talk) 08:53, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

Hi there, just posted this on WikiProject Business but figured I can post here too. Been on Wikipedia for years but haven't taken a deep interest for business/company articles until recently. I did my first long-form article recently, Zapier, and I'd like your feedback on it. Been getting familiarized with all the new policies but would like a gut-check. I want to help take business articles to GA status so any guidance is appreciate. If I'm in the wrong place please let me know, TY. Morogris (✉ • ✎) 05:03, 27 January 2026 (UTC)

@Morogris:, you would get more feedback if you opened the GA. There are more editors reviewing GA's than responding here. Good luck. --CNMall41 (talk) 09:20, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

@CNMall41: Thank you! I was hoping to get more feedback prior to GA (which I do plan to nominate this later). Wouldn't want to put this in front of a GA review and have it fail. But if that's the only route then I guess that's it! Appreciate the response. Morogris (✉ • ✎) 20:42, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

I get that. Nothing wrong with failure. Keep in mind that you will probably get more quality feedback through GA review. That is, assuming you feel it is ready. --CNMall41 (talk) 21:10, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

There is an RFC in progress at Talk:Maire Tecnimont. Your participation is invited. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:31, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Seer (company)#Requested move 2 February 2026 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ROY is WAR Talk! 04:18, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

The article Kasenna has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Tagged for Notability concerns for 15 years. Survived a speedy deletion through DGG's intervention. No other language has a reliably sourced article from which to translate. Fails the relevant notability guidelines. Defunct, so no new sources are available.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. Bearian (talk) 16:09, 11 February 2026 (UTC)

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Palantir Technologies#Requested move 5 February 2026 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. TarnishedPath^talk 10:20, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

Hi. I’m reaching out on behalf of Faculty to request assistance with improving the Faculty (company) article. I work for Kekst CNC, which is a signatory to the Industry Statement on Wikipedia, and therefore following guidelines due to our COI.

Over time, the Faculty page has been vandalised as 60% of the content is controversy, but if you check the referenced sources (where there are references), the article indicates guilt-by-association framing, routine practices such as staff moving between firms are positioned to imply wrongdoing without evidence, and Faculty’s actual work isn’t represented or accurately described. As a side point, the firm has just been acquired by Accenture, so professional due-diligence doesn’t align with the ‘facts’ on Wikipedia.

We have two factual NPOV updates to start improving the quality of this page from a C-Class, which are:

1. Remove the controversies section as WP:CRITS clearly outlines these do not follow NPOV. We will then suggest changes to integrate any accurate content from this section rebalancing for NPOV. If you look at the existing content of this section, it has clearly been written by individuals with a view against Faculty.
2. Updating the basic business details about Faculty given all facts and figures require updating (we’re not looking to promote but merely make sure the business is factually represented).

Please can an editor confirm the best way for these changes to be addressed? We’re happy to submit a draft of a new full page for review, for instance. Alternatively, we can provide suggested changes piecemeal.

Thank you for your help. MichaelPWhite (talk) 13:12, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

I've replied at Talk:Faculty_(company)#Supporting_factual_updates_for_Faculty. Let's keep the discussion there where it belongs. SmartSE (talk) 14:31, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

Hi, I wanted to let editors here know that on the Humana Talk page, I have an open request for cleaning up the article's sources. Currently, it relies on press releases, Humana's website, or sites that don't otherwise meet guidelines. There are also several citation needed tags. Let me know if you want to discuss more. E Humana (talk) 18:53, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

Current Skyline employee (full disclosure: User:Lks-1989) seeking review of Draft:Skyline_Communications. Sources meet WP:GNG/WP:NCORP?

- De Tijd 2024 profile (1500+ words): family business, market position - Two Flanders Export Lion awards (VRT NWS 2012/2017) - National Ventilus controversy (nl:Ventilus): returned award in protest (De Tijd, HLN, VRT 2023)

Happy to make suggested improvements. Thank you! Lks-1989 (talk) 16:20, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

If you feel it is ready for review you should submit through AfC. I would pull out the operations and facilities section as I do not see how encyclopedia users would want to know about the company's 11-story office tower of where its hubs are located.--CNMall41 (talk) 08:07, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for taking the time to review the article. Appreciate it! Lks-1989 (talk) 08:14, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Sourcebooks (publisher)#Requested move 18 February 2026 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. TarnishedPath^talk 05:00, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Proposed acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery#Requested move 27 February 2026 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. — Trailblazer¹⁰¹🔥 ^{(discuss · contribs)} 02:00, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

I'm not sure if it's notable. Bearian (talk) 04:21, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

@Bearian:, not in my opinion. There are several companies with similar names but what I find on this one isn't even close to WP:NCORP. --CNMall41 (talk) 08:03, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

AfD here--CNMall41 (talk) 08:03, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

Thanks. Bearian (talk) 08:08, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

Just notifying members of this project that there are Conflict of Interest edit requests relevant to this WikiProject at:

• The Weather Company
• PTV Group.
• Brookfield Corporation
• Hyve Group
• HID Global
• Henley & Partners
• Better.com
• Vishal Garg (businessman)
• Synaptics
• NetZero
• Persona (identity verification service)
• EBay
• ADP (company)
• Natco Pharma
• IQ Option
• Norwest Venture Partners

DrThneed (talk) 03:26, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

Adding five further COI edit requests DrThneed (talk) 05:37, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Adding five further COI edit requests DrThneed (talk) 04:10, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Zetland (company)#Requested move 24 February 2026 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. CNC (talk) 20:25, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:F. W. Woolworth Company#Requested move 26 February 2026 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 00:38, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Indesit#Requested move 26 February 2026 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. TarnishedPath^talk 02:35, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

The article What? Records has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Tagged as Unreferenced for 16 years. No other language has a reliably sourced article from which to translate. A Google search found only similarly named record companies. Fails the relevant notability guidelines. Lacks significant coverage.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. Bearian (talk) 11:02, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

Good Day,

My article Denodo has been nominated for deletion based on insufficient reliable sources showing its notability for WP:CORP. However, I feel that this is an unfair nomination, as I have provided numerous reliable, independent sources to verify the article. I have voted in the deletion discussion, stating sources that have been used for notability, amongst others. I would appreciate any input on this matter. Either areas for improvement in the article that could be flagging it for deletion, or edits directly to the article that could help keep it on Wikipedia, and also positive votes, as I believe that it is a notable company that should be on Wikipedia.

Thanks so much! Van1985 (talk) 09:22, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Hi editors, on behalf of Mastercard via my work at Beutler Ink, I posted this edit request to update the article's very outdated Corporate affairs section, if anyone is interested. Thank you, Danilo Two (talk) 17:10, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Rich's (department store)#Requested move 2 March 2026 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. HurricaneZeta^C 18:33, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Wasserman (company)#Requested move 10 March 2026 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ROY is WAR Talk! 03:49, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

The previous list is getting long, starting a second list of COI edit requests relevant to this project. The current list of COI edit requests is over 400 articles, so any help responding to these is much appreciated:

• Acorns (company) article
• AppFolio article
• Haivision article
• Headspace (company) article
• BMC Software article
• InKind article
• Bill's article
• Neighbor (company) article
• Owens & Minor article
• Mastercard article
• Schott Pharma article
• Argus Media article One implemented, one needs clarification. --CNMall41 (talk) 23:18, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
• Barracuda Networks article
• Gilead Sciences article
• CoStar Group article

DrThneed (talk) 22:01, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Adding a further five companies. DrThneed (talk) 01:14, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

Adding four further companies. Together with the first batch I posted, these are all the current company edit requests (less those that seemed more relevant to a more-specific WikiProject), so you should now only get edit requests listed as they are made. Thanks in advance to anyone able to help out with this backlog. DrThneed (talk) 03:30, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

There is a discussion regarding discographies of record labels at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Albums#Record_Label_Discographies regarding the inclusion appropriateness of exhaustive listing of products by record labels. As record labels are not inherently special and they're an organization/company like any other company, I believe this should be advertised here as well. Please comment at the target page. Graywalls (talk) 05:59, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Anthropic#Requested move 11 March 2026 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Qwerty123M (talk) 20:36, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

I have Carlisle & Finch up for review at FAC. This is a company that's been in business in Cincinnati for over 100 years. It could use some additional reviews. RoySmith (talk) 12:14, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello!

My name is Alyssa, I am a representative for Dassault Systèmes, which recently made an announcement pertaining to Nvidia. I have made a proposal for an update to the article's on the Talk page. If you have any questions, let me know. ~~~~ Alyssa at 3DS (talk) 13:47, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Tesla, Inc. has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 17:31, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Talk here. Paranoid25 (talk) 09:09, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:History of Twitter#Requested move 15 March 2026 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Abesca (talk) 17:38, 19 March 2026 (UTC)