Wikipedia:Artificial intelligence resources

Alpagut (martial art)

Alpagut (martial art) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I suggest draftifying, this article isn't written according to Wikipedia standards Awesomecat (✉ / ✎) 22:31, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Awesomecat (✉ / ✎) 22:31, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Martial arts and Azerbaijan. Shellwood (talk) 22:35, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

	This LLM-generated text has been collapsed and should be excluded from assessments of consensus.
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
Keep - The subject meets the General Notability Guideline (GNG) as it has received significant coverage in multiple reliable, independent media outlets. Alpagut is not just a local sport but an internationally recognized martial art with organized championships across several countries. Furthermore, it qualifies under WP:NSPORT due to its international federation status and participation in multi-sport events. I will be adding more independent secondary sources (international news agencies and sports journals) to the article to address the concerns regarding "independent coverage." KülTegin.Alp (talk) 22:40, 14 March 2026 (UTC) Further comment - To address the concerns regarding independent coverage, I have identified several high-quality, third-party sources that demonstrate the international recognition and institutional standing of Alpagut: Institutional Recognition: The International Council of Sport Science and Physical Education (ICSSPE), a global umbrella organization (partner of UNESCO and IOC), officially recognized and accepted the World Alpagut Federation as a member in May 2022 (Source: ICSSPE Official Website). International Media Coverage: The state-run Qazafnom (Kazakhstan) reported on the strategic development of Alpagut in Central Asia and the establishment of the Asian Alpagut Federation (Source: Qazinform). Major Multi-Sport Events: Alpagut has been part of the World Nomad Games (one of the largest traditional sports festivals globally), with coverage from international agencies like Xinhua and TRT World highlighting its role in the martial arts programs (Source: Xinhua News). International Membership: The federation is also a member of TAFISA (The Association For International Sport for All), which is a key indicator of international sports legitimacy. I will now proceed to integrate these citations into the main article to ensure it meets the required encyclopedic standards. KülTegin.Alp (talk) 22:48, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

I'm curious why you decided not to go through WP:AfC for this article. I was mainly suggesting draftifying your article before it gets moved to mainspace. I'm not arguing that Alpagut isn't notable. Awesomecat (✉ / ✎) 02:12, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

After looking at some of the links in your citations, a lot of them seem to be dead links, like this one, this one, and this one. It leads me to believe you might be using generative AI for your articles and citations. This specific article doesn't even bring up Alpagut. Awesomecat (✉ / ✎) 02:21, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

They are also using AI to generate the replies here. --Gurkubondinn (talk) 09:21, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

	This LLM-generated text has been collapsed and should be excluded from assessments of consensus.
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
Keep – I would like to consolidate my position regarding the significance of Alpagut and address the comments made in the discussion. First, to address the academic and historical foundations: We have now provided a comprehensive methodology paper that outlines the technical systems and the historical "Urmu Theory" of Alpagut. This document serves as a primary source to prove that the discipline is a structured martial art based on extensive research: Alpagut: The Methodology and Historical Foundations. Furthermore, the international legitimacy of Alpagut is confirmed by its verified memberships in global bodies such as TAFISA, ICSSPE, and the International Fair Play Committee. Secondly, regarding the use of AI tools: As a non-native English speaker representing an international sports organization, I use AI-assisted tools to ensure my communication is clear and grammatically correct for a global audience. While these tools help bridge the language gap, the facts, academic references, and institutional memberships provided are entirely authentic and verifiable. Using a tool to refine language does not diminish the factual validity of the evidence presented. I have updated the article to include these academic references and believe they sufficiently address the "notability" concerns. I kindly ask the community to evaluate the article based on these verifiable facts. KülTegin.Alp (talk) 09:49, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

Stop bludgeoning this discussion with AI-generated junk. --Gurkubondinn (talk) 09:22, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

	This LLM-generated text has been collapsed and should be excluded from assessments of consensus.
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
Update: I have added several formal academic and data verifications to establish the legitimacy and notability of Alpagut: Zenodo (DOI): The methodology is now registered with DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19039783. ORCID: Verified researcher profile linked: 0009-0001-4278-1250. Wikidata: Formal authority control established via Q25546332 (Alpagut) and Q138685286 (Founder). These links provide verifiable, independent, and scholarly data to support the "Keep" status of the article.KülTegin.Alp (talk) 16:15, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

• Draftify per nom. I suspect the article is AI-generated, which is further backed by the responses of the creator here. Kelob2678 (talk) 17:59, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 01:05, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Suspected AI-generated articles-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:56, 22 March 2026 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:NEWLLM. The fake references in the initial revision would of made the article WP:G15able. Jumpytoo Talk 04:19, 22 March 2026 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:NEWLLM, as hastily as possible and with full prejudice. Fabricating references should warrant blocking. --Gurkubondinn (talk) 09:24, 22 March 2026 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:NEWLLM and sanctions should be considered if the author keeps using AI in communication and using the Shaggy defense. SecretSpectre (talk) 10:03, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

National bank veto

National bank veto (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per comments at Did you know nominations/National bank veto, article has had substantial WP:LLM problems since its first edit. User who created it has been blocked under complicated circumstances. I don't think it is practical or time-efficient to try to discern what is usable and factual from the material that currently exists here, and moreover there are already articles at Bank War and Second Bank of the United States where tightly-focused improvements could be provided instead. TheFeds 20:14, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance and Politics. TheFeds 20:14, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Delete per WP:NEWLLM and WP:TNT. I found several hallucinations that don't match the provided sources. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 21:13, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Suspected AI-generated articles-related deletion discussions. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 21:14, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Delete per WP:NEWLLM and nom Kowal2701 (talk, contribs) 21:40, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History, Law, and Washington, D.C.. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:20, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
• Delete Besides the LLM issues, why the heck was an article created for something already covered at Bank War#Veto? Utter lunacy. Reywas92^Talk 03:10, 22 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Noting that the author's article Clay–Randolph duel is also tagged for potential LLM use – it has some pretty absurd redundancy within it. — Reywas92^Talk 03:17, 22 March 2026 (UTC)
• Delete instead of redirect so that the LLM-generated content doesn't live on in the page history. Cielquiparle (talk) 06:46, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

Aeronautics (magazine)

Aeronautics (magazine) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There are many issues with this page, the most obvious of which is that it's entirely AI slop. The original form of the article was intended to promote an AI website called aeronauticsmagazine.com, but that has since been removed. The user contesting the PROD asserted that this is a WP:SIA, but I don't see how it meets any of the criteria to exist as one: it isn't navigationally useful as none of the entries are bluelinked, there's no evidence that the topic of "magazines called Aeronautics" is notable, and the third criterion ("Short, complete list") states Lists in which no entry is notable are rarely appropriate. Even if the topic is notable and encyclopedic, WP:TNT applies, as there are no inline citations, making it unreasonably difficult to determine where the AI has hallucinated. lp0 on fire () 09:26, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Aviation, Lists, and Suspected AI-generated articles. lp0 on fire () 09:26, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

  I still think it meets either the first or third criterion for a WP:SETINDEX. The essay WP:TNT applies ONLY to articles "hopelessly irreparable" (first sentence). So keep and prune. Will give it a radical try. ~2026-16195-13 (talk) 09:59, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

   Done Shall we add https://aeronauticsmagazine.com in EL? Why should it be considered an AI website (whatever that means)? (Not saying it's notable but to avoid confusion (mentioning: an unrelated website, affiliated with Amazon LLC)) ~2026-16195-13 (talk) 10:16, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

• Note: This article has significantly changed since its AfD nomination. ~2026-16195-13 (talk) 10:17, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

  so Keep! ~2026-16195-13 (talk) 10:19, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Comment There is still no indication that any of these magazines are notable, either individually or as a group. If nobody can find better sources, this fails WP:LISTN and WP:SIA#Common selection criteria. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 22:26, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Sylheti Wikipedia

Sylheti Wikipedia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD denied. User:Muydivertido's rationale for the PROD was: This article was created by a user who was later indefinitely blocked for sockpuppetry. The user was also using AI to edit Wikipedia articles as mentioned in the discussion. The user has also created this article and it displays clear and strong indications of AI-generation. UtherSRG (talk) 01:35, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language, Suspected AI-generated articles, and Bangladesh. UtherSRG (talk) 01:35, 20 March 2026 (UTC)
• Delete. The article talks about preserving the Sylheti language, so keeping an AI-generated article about the Wikipedia for it is in very poor form and does it no favours. --Gurkubondinn (talk) 01:47, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

  I think this should be deleted and then recreated as a redirect to List of Wikipedias. There is no point in preserving this page history. --Gurkubondinn (talk) 11:56, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:45, 20 March 2026 (UTC)
• The article talks about preserving the Sylheti language is not a fair description of the page, which for the most part focuses on what it should, as other articles in Category:Wikipedias by language; Keep and add more sources (https://www.prothomalo.com/technology/y3eu9swvz3 for example) to the currently present ones and trim ; or redirect to List of Wikipedias (#301) per WP:ATD-R/WP:IGNORINGATD.--~2026-16195-13 (talk) 08:20, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

  One of the project's notable contributors ... has been active in promoting the Sylheti language and its script

  ... he described the launch as "a significant milestone in the preservation and promotion of the Sylheti language and culture."

  The creation of the Sylheti Wikipedia has been described as an important development for the language's digital preservation. The Business Standard characterized it as "an effort to preserve the heritage of the 'Sylheti' language," noting that Sylheti speakers face concerns about their linguistic identity being erased.

  The Wikipedia edition serves not only as an encyclopedia but also as a platform for documenting and revitalizing the script.

  The launch has also drawn attention to the broader debate about Sylheti's status as a language rather than a dialect.

  ... the project provides a link to ancestral language and culture.

  
  — Sylheti Wikipedia

  The article undeniably focuses on the status and preservation of the Sylheti language a lot. This is all pretty obviously written by an LLM, which in my opinion shows a lack of respect for the language and does it no favours, and also reflects badly on Wikipedia in and of itself. --Gurkubondinn (talk) 15:38, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

  Strongly oppose redirection if it was LLM-generated. Geschichte (talk) 20:25, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

  Phrases such as ... has been described as an important development ..., ... noting that Sylheti speakers face concerns ..., ... serves not only as an ... but also as ..., ... drawn attention to the broader debate ... reads like WP:AILEGACY to me. --Gurkubondinn (talk) 11:52, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

  Even your quotes show that the Wikipedia page IS the main focus of the article but, independently, the article can be trimmed/pruned. ~2026-16195-13 (talk) 00:16, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

  Sure, I wasn't saying that the article does not focus on the Wikipedia. My point was that it also focues on the importance of preserving the Sylheti language, and using an AI to talk about the importance of preserving a language is an affront to that language. Apologies if I was not clear. --Gurkubondinn (talk) 11:47, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

• Speedy delete per WP:G15. PokémonPerson 16:16, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

  G15 (LLM-generated pages without human review) does not apply, in my view@Geschichte. The text does not present signs of "Communication intended for the user" nor "Implausible, non-existent, or nonsensical references". I have scanned the sections Background and Significance and the AI detector found them totally "Human written".... ~2026-16195-13 (talk) 00:14, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Kiewiet Lengana Pali

Kiewiet Lengana Pali (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Name-checked as a coach for possibly notable artists, but no SIGCOV. Likely to fail WP:NBIO. KH-1 (talk) 11:37, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Suspected AI-generated articles, Artists, Academics and educators, South Africa, and Bands and musicians. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 13:37, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

Delete per nom. Tioaeu8943 (talk) 16:26, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

Delete - per nom.

The "Teaching philosophy" and "Notable students" sections have the classic ChatGPT "Bold and Bullet Point" paragraphs. ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 18:59, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

Hi. You have clearly missed the part where in mentioned that he coached the likes of Masabane Cecilia Rangwanasha who is a South African soprano and is the winner of the BBC Cardiff Singer of the World . The list extend to Nkululeko Masuku finalist on Britain’s Got Talent 2024. These are two South Africans who were coached by Pali. I dispute this nomination for deletion as you want to overlook his work and influence over the two South African exports. KeMang?? (talk) 03:39, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

• Delete. Obviously AI generated. If he's notable, and I'm not saying that he is, better to start over. Josh Milburn (talk) 15:46, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
• Delete per what J Milburn said. --Gurkubondinn (talk) 01:38, 20 March 2026 (UTC)
• Delete per J Milburn et al. - we are not LinkedIn, and we are not Grokpedia. There are many signs of AI editing. It's much better, from a risk perspective, to start from scratch. I don't think it's common knowledge yet that we've been under attack due to articles just like this one, which is why they keep getting created. Bearian (talk) 14:24, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

Nueva Iberica

Nueva Iberica (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There does not appear to be WP:SIGCOV of nueva iberica as a music genre. Google Scholar has two hits for "nueva Iberica" + music, one is about chess and the other about sugarcane production. A regular google search gets hits on Wikiwand and the Wikipedia page List of electronic music genres where the term was added by User:Splendid entry who also created Nueva Iberica. I can't see other relevant hits. In addition the text appears to be AI-generated, has very few sources, and the third paragraph explicitly states that the term is not widely used (hence the article is WP:OR: Although the specific term "Nueva Iberica" is not widely used in the published literature, it is employed here descriptively to summarise musical practices that are independently documented in these and other journalistic sources. The article was previously nominated for speedy deletion and PROD but contested by author, see discussion on Talk:Nueva_Iberica. Lijil (talk) 09:38, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music, Suspected AI-generated articles, and Spain. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:46, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for speedy deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 11:33, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

• Keep may be rewritten and enreached with additional sources, but AI must be removed. And so the buck stops (talk) 17:53, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

What sources support the notability of this topic? Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:50, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:16, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fade258 (talk) 14:33, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. The article also cites a 160-page work, but it is a thesis and therefore not reliable. Kelob2678 (talk) 20:14, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
• Delete as an AI-generated article created in violation of WP:NEWLLM. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 06:55, 22 March 2026 (UTC)