User:Ace111

Wikipedia editor From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

MediaWiki version 1.46.0-wmf.20 (5745453).

More information Wikipedia:Babel ...
This user is a bot owner. His bot is Acebot (talk · contribs).
This user runs a bot, Acebot (contribs). It performs tasks that are extremely tedious to do manually.
This user has created a global account. Ace111's main account is on Wikipedia (in Russian).
This user is from the planet Earth.
This user enjoys the
Picture of the Day.¤
This user contributes using Firefox.
Close
Magpie goose
Photograph credit: JJ Harrison

Edits Count / Contribution Tree , Plot ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

More information Top 10 Greatest Wikipedias, More than 66,771,648 articles in all Wikipedias ...
Top 10 Greatest Wikipedias
English Sinugboanon Deutsch Français Svenska Nederlands Español Русский Italiano Polski
7,154,246 6,115,168+ 3,106,110+ 2,745,926+ 2,622,029+ 2,214,852+ 2,101,909+ 2,091,382+ 1,961,551+ 1,688,755+
More than 66,771,648 articles in all Wikipedias
Close

Slavic Wikipedias have 8,568,343 articles.

Russia


Anelinka


Anelinka (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A BLP with mostly unrelated references, only 2 and 3 talk about her seriously and I don't think they are reliable sources, they look like puff-y pieces but I could be wrong about russian Internet. As far as I can tell the claim to notability is for performing at the Likee Party Tour 2025 but I don't see that as actually being enough with or without sources. Doesn't pass Music Notability standards either. I tried to do a Before search but all I turned up was the different singer, Анелия Георгиева Атанасова, who actually does seem to pass notability, Moritoriko (talk) 06:39, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

Gavrilo Martsenkovich


Gavrilo Martsenkovich (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG; tagged for lack of SIGCOV since 2009. I can't access the links on Ukrainian Wikipedia, which is likewise a stub dump. ⋆。˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚。⋆ 16:08, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

Khieu Thavika

Khieu Thavika (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article went to AfD in 2013, being closed as no consensus. However, 13 years later the article remains a two-sentence permastub directory listing, with the only source being a primary source - a government list of diplomatic missions of Cambodia in 2008. AusLondonder (talk) 16:05, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

Peter Troubetzkoy


Peter Troubetzkoy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NPOL; no sources for over 20 years. thejiujiangdragon 🔥🐉 03:26, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Russia. thejiujiangdragon 🔥🐉 03:26, 15 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Comment They may meet WP:NPOL if the information in the article is correct, although we need sourcing for those claims. Seems like a page in need of cleanup more than an AFD in my opinion. Any editor working on a cleanup needs to be sure the sources are talking about the right guy. He appears to be from a political family and a few relatives may have similar names. The relatives made it hard for me to find sources in a cursory search. TulsaPoliticsFan (talk) 16:04, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete, unless somebody with far more expertise on 19th-century Russian politics than I've got can find better sourcing. There are potentially plausible notability claims being made here, but it's not unknown for us to see total WP:HOAXes published to Wikipedia about people who never really held the political offices they're claimed to have held — so it's not the statement of holding an NPOL-passing political office that gets the person over NPOL, it's the quality of the sourcing that can be added to verify and confirm that the statement to passing NPOL is true. So, yeah, it would be fine if there were better referencing in it to properly verify the claims — but it says nothing about him that would be "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to pass GNG on his sourceability. Bearcat (talk) 21:38, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Keep - I found multiple sources on this guy, and as a prince and diplomat he would have been a notable figure of his time - Воспоминания флигель-адъютанта императора Николая II: Том 2. N.p., Мультимедийное издательство Стрельбицкого, 2018 (p. xxxvii, "Trubetskoy Pavel (Paolo) Petrovich (1866-1938) sculptor and artist, worked in Italy, USA, England, Russia and France. Illegitimate son of a Russian emigrant, Prince Pyotr Petrovich Trubetskoy (1822-1892)."), Русская Италия. Аргументы недели, 2022 ("Pyotr Petrovich, Paolo's father, was a Russian diplomat. In 1863, he arrived in Italy as the Russian representative in Florence, not yet knowing that he would remain there for the rest of his life. In Italy, the prince married an American woman, Ada Winans, from New York, who had come to Florence to study singing. For her sake, Prince Trubetskoy broke off his relationship with his wife, who remained in Russia, and for a long time was unable to return there, having been accused of bigamy.", ref also confirms Peter's parents and year of birth), Даргинская трагедия: 1845 год. Изд-во журнала "Звезда", 2001 (p. 573, "Trubetskoy Petr Petrovich (1822-1892) – prince, in 1845 a lieutenant in cavalry, served on special assignments with the commander-in-chief of the Separate Caucasian Corps."), Невский архив. Rusia, Atheneum, 1993 (p. 157, "Prince Pyotr Petrovich Trubetskoy (Tulchin, 22.8.1822 Menton, 28.8.1892; buried in the cemetery. Vieux-Château) broke off relations with his wife, Princess Varvara Yuryevna Trubetskoy (7.3.1828 1.4.1901), who remained in Russia, because of Ada Winans (or Uynans; Ada Winans, 1835-1917). Although he received a divorce by decree of the Holy Synod of October 26, 1870, No. 2299, there was an opinion about his bigamy."), Belavkin, I. P.. Из истории рода Лермонтовых: архивные находки. Изд-во "Борей-Арт, ", 2006 (p. 73, "Pyotr Petrovich (1822-1892) was the elder brother of Nikolai Petrovich. He was married to Princess Varvara Yuryevna Trubetskoy. He was the father of the famous impressionist sculptor Paolo Troubetzkoy (1763-1938), born of a marriage not recognized in Russia."), and so forth. --Soman (talk) 23:51, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

List of ambassadors of Russia to Kiribati


List of ambassadors of Russia to Kiribati (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Poorly-sourced list of non-notable, non-resident ambassadors. Lacking secondary sources. AusLondonder (talk) 18:42, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Pridnestrovian Moldavian Soviet Socialist Republic


Pridnestrovian Moldavian Soviet Socialist Republic (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:CONTENTFORK. The content of this article can be (and largely already is) covered in the following articles: Transnistria, Transnistria conflict, History of Transnistria, Moldova–Transnistria relations, Transnistrian War, Moldavian Soviet Socialist Republic.

This article covers one of the most contentious years of the political conflict (the conflict's article and this one have the same start date in Wikipedia, the 2 September 1990 sovereignty declaration), the most flamed ones other than the 1992 war, to which these years served as a prelude. I think it is apparent much of the information here is the necessary context for the articles dealing with the conflict and the war.

Furthermore, we don't usually give articles to Soviet administrative units that increased or decreased of status for a short period of time. Gagauz Republic covers both the Gagauz ASSR and the Gagauz SSR, while Abkhaz Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic covers the brief moment when the Abkhaz ASSR declared itself again an SSR from 1990 to 1992. And these two, as well as the entity this article covers, were self-proclaimed, unexistent entities in Soviet law. I don't think we need a separate article for this. We are effectively meaning to separate the essential backgroud information on the conflict and war into a separate article. In this situation there will always be considerable repetition across articles. The information fits elsewhere. Super Ψ Dro 20:42, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

I am not sure what "not liking this article" would even achieve or is supposed to mean. I believe we have many articles with overlapping scopes and that this one is unnecessary. The AfD will not be dismissed only because you'd seemingly want it to.
The B-classing is clearly undeserved. This article is not a well-written one, over half (quick eye calculation) of it is unsourced. Even if it was better referenced, I'd still argue there is no need for us to have a separate article for the two-year period that led to both the Transnistria conflict (same start date as here; also the most heated moment of the conflict other than the war itself) and the Transnistria War. All of the articles I linked above (except the last) deal in the end with the Transnistria conflict in some way or another, are all of them really necessary separately? Considering that in other similar cases (self-proclaimed Gagauz ASSR/SSR and second Abkhaz SSR) we do not split the content into a separate article.
What exactly can this article feature that could not be included in Transnistria conflict or similar articles? This one deals with the very start of the conflict. Super Ψ Dro 14:09, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Keep. There is a "duplication" tag on the article. Editors are already aware of its defects. The best use of their brainpower would be to figure out how to corral this sprawling topic. The meat of the article begins in the 7th section out of 10. Everything before that is forked material. Readers should be clearly guided to related articles, and the substance about the short-lived Pridnestrovian Moldavian Soviet Socialist Republic should be beefed up. Trumpetrep (talk) 15:48, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 02:27, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
Keep Article explains a past version of Transnistria, one before de-facto independence, yet de-jure part of moldova. Also keep per @Anonimu and @Trumpetrep. shane (talk to me if you want!) 15:10, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
That is not true. Transnistria as a separate entity (since 1940) and the topic this article covers start on the same date. Same for the political conflict. Control from the central government at this time was very little, and the region had also already declared itself separate from Chișinău. Super Ψ Dro 20:42, 18 March 2026 (UTC)


Others







Draft


Science

List of fellows of the Nigerian Academy of Science


List of fellows of the Nigerian Academy of Science (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Primarily unsourced, I favour restoring the longstanding redirect. Redirect has been restored a few times and reverted. Mariamnei (talk) 07:35, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

Kunthavai Naacchiyaar Government Arts College for Women


Kunthavai Naacchiyaar Government Arts College for Women (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Zero sources to demonstrate NOTABILITY and also fails WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 13:42, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

Seethalakshmi Ramaswami College


Seethalakshmi Ramaswami College (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSCHOOL and WP:V Filmssssssssssss (talk) 13:41, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

Christhu Raj College


Christhu Raj College (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 13:33, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

Michael S. Engel


Michael S. Engel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Significant portions and overall volume of the article are likely COI editing by Engel himself or by close associates, almost all IP edits have come from the Lawrence, Kansas area. Additionally there is no significant coverage of Engel in neutral secondary sources. Kevmin § 01:31, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Science, Kansas, Missouri, and New York. WCQuidditch 03:19, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Keep. He has enormous citation counts for a taxonomist, easily enough for WP:PROF#C1, his multiple society fellowships also pass WP:PROF#C3, and his University Distinguished Professor title passes WP:PROF#C5. Any one of these would be enough. The badly justified nomination fails to address the correct notability criterion, WP:PROF, for which independent secondary sources are totally irrelevant. —David Eppstein (talk) 04:04, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Keep. Agree with editor David Eppstein above. I think consensus should continue as it has been implied for more than 20 years, the life span of this article on WP. P.I. Ellsworth, ed.  welcome!  06:41, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
    If this is your reasoning, then I have a fairly serious question: given that the page was created by Micael Engel, and all of the substantive edits and additions to it were contributed by Michael Engel, aren't you giving a green light to any editor who decides that they are notable, and take steps to maintain therir own self-edited article without interference via anonymous IP edits? This article has been flagged - appropriately, given what WHOIS says about the IP edits - as a COI issue for over fifteen years. Why was it not deleted long ago? Again, if the only reason you are voting to keep is because the article has not been deleted yet, that does not seem appropriate for a self-created and self-edited article. Dyanega (talk) 14:49, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
    It's simply not true that "all of the substantive edits and additions to it were contributed by Michael Engel" -- see January 2023 for example. Athel cb (talk) 17:04, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
    Yes, the edits in January 2023 are a good example. All of these were changes to existing text, mostly providing citations, not the addiion of new material. Fixing a bad or broken citation is not a substantive edit, it is routine maintenance. That list of eponyms was added in edits by Engel himself, nearly always via the anonymous IP addresses in Kansas. Prior to that January 2023 set of edits, several eponyms had been added in a spate of edits June of 2022, from a dial-up in Miami, when Engel was attending the meeting of the Florida Entomological Society (see this edit history). Coincidence? Note the content and targets of all of those edits. Is it odd that no one ever suggested the article be deleted back then? Maybe, but I don't see how that justifies letting COI abuse be "grandfathered in" just because no one called for deletion before. Dyanega (talk) 17:38, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Keep. Regardless of who created the article and who subsequently edited it, the GoogleScholar record is very impressive. h = 70 is a lot for an entomologist. (It would be very respectable, though not stupendous, for a biochemist, a subject I know more about, but it is more than just respectable in a lower-citation field.) Notice also that a high proportion of the well cited papers have one or two authors, so it's pretty clear that he did much or most of the work. A curious point that I noticed is that the editor who now wants the article deleted made a series of eleven edits in January 2023 with no suggestion that it should be deleted. Athel cb (talk) 17:01, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
    It should be noted that a notable portion of the later papers in the CV are published though a journal that Engel personally started and served as chief editor of, removing the peer-review portion of the science entirely. Actively avoiding peer-review to increase the paper count is not a good situation.--Kevmin § 17:24, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
    The highest number of citations is for a Cambridge University Press book, and the highly-cited articles are in journals including PNAS and Nature. In this situation, I don't see how his also publishing in a journal he edited affects the determination of notability (particularly since we don't even need to look at C1). Nor do I think that publishing in a journal one co-founded is necessarily unethical. If it's the Journal of Melittology you mean, everyone's status seems to be declared above board. His papers from the period when he was chief editor say that he was chief editor (for example). It's not substantially different from having a departmental newsletter or posting notes on one's own faculty website, only it's packaged as a journal for convenience. Maybe that's shady, maybe not; it's up to the scientists in that field to determine whether they're using that journal to push bad papers. Stepwise Continuous Dysfunction (talk) 20:53, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Question. What is the policy-based reason for deletion here? Unclear whether the rationale is lack of notability or something else. YFB ¿ 18:43, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Keep Passes WP:PROF on two criteria (C3 and C5) independent of citations. The existing text isn't so bad that problems with it can't be fixed through ordinary cleanup. Stepwise Continuous Dysfunction (talk) 20:28, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Unsure I don't think there is an issue of notability as an academic taxonomist. He was co-author on Evolution of Insects and has papers in major journals. If the article was written by neutral editors, there would be no problem. But it wasn't. I think the issue of COI with a large number of IP edits is a major problem, which doesn't go away just because it's being going on so long. A long history of COI doesn't make it less of an issue. It seems that keeping the article would be rewarding the violation of COI rules, although the article is not unacceptable. Keeping the article does add something to the encyclopaedia (hence keep), but overlooking violations of the rules doesn't help the credibility of Wikipedia (hence delete).    Jts1882 | talk  09:55, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
    I'm similarly of two minds on this but it does seem as though punishing the article for the sins of the author, so to speak, may be at odds with the policy intent. If the article meets the criteria for inclusion (subject to cleanup / depuffery) then surely the conversation should be about whether sanctions on the COI editor/IP are appropriate - which would be a discussion for another venue. YFB ¿ 21:44, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Also Unsure and for the same reasons Jts1882 gives; the notability issue is a bit of a distraction, but I'll say that he is not more notable than a large number of other entomologists who have no entry in Wikipedia at all. Yes, I know quite well that this is not how things work, and it's a logical fallacy. "Person X has a Wikipedia article, but person Y is more notable and does not" is, all things being equal, a terrible argument. The difference here is that the only reason this particular person HAS a Wikipedia article is because he created it, and maintained it, and added to it for a very long time. In other words, all things are NOT equal here. This brings me to a question that I hope someone can answer: is it possible to permanently block an article from anonymous edits? If Engel cannot be prevented from anonymously editing this article, then I would vote to delete it rather than allow him to continue to do so; if a block CAN be instituted, then I would vote to keep. Dyanega (talk) 15:40, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
    @Dyanega: Yes it is possible, the article would need to be at least semi-protected to prevent new or unregistered users from editing it (see Wikipedia:Protection policy). Monster Iestyn (talk) 16:00, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

Government College, Meenchantha


Government College, Meenchantha (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 23:43, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

Government College of Arts and Science, Aurangabad


Government College of Arts and Science, Aurangabad (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 11:10, 16 March 2026 (UTC) I am also nominating the following related pages because they also fail WP:NSCHOOL and GNG,. often only with single sources for the entire page

Government Institute of Science, Aurangabad (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
S.B.E.S. College of Science (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Shivchhatrapati College, Aurangabad (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Yogeshwari Mahavidyalaya (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Dr. (Sow.) Indirabai Bhaskarrao Pathak Mahila Kala Mahavidyalaya (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Vasantrao Naik Mahavidyalaya, Aurangabad (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
  1. Government Institute of Science – Redirect to Aurangabad#Education
  2. S.B.E.S. College of Science – Redirect to Aurangabad#Education
  3. Shivchhatrapati College – Keep - Found borderline SIGCOV in some Marathi language articles.
  4. Yogeshwari Mahavidyalaya – Redirect to Ambajogai#Education
  5. Dr. (Sow.) Indirabai Bhaskarrao Pathak Mahila Kala Mahavidyalaya – Redirect to Aurangabad#Education
  6. Vasantrao Naik Mahavidyalaya – Redirect to Aurangabad#Education BhikhariInformer (talk) 13:24, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Mary Matha Arts & Science College


Mary Matha Arts & Science College (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 11:17, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

  • Keep A Malayalam-language search yielded sources (now added) that I believe make the article meet notability criteria

nahleghini (talk) 00:54, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

Bharat Ratna Dr. A. P. J. Abdul Kalam Government Arts and Science College


Bharat Ratna Dr. A. P. J. Abdul Kalam Government Arts and Science College (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Couldn’t find anything appropriately notable outside of Wikipedia for this page. Fails WP:NSOURCE and NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 11:54, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Seethalakshmi Achi College for Women


Seethalakshmi Achi College for Women (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fail WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 18:07, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Idhaya College for Women, Sarungani


Idhaya College for Women, Sarungani (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 18:14, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Raja Doraisingam Government Arts College


Raja Doraisingam Government Arts College (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 18:11, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Sri Sarada Niketan College for Women


Sri Sarada Niketan College for Women (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 18:09, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Madurai Sivakasi Nadar's Pioneer Meenakshi Women's College


Madurai Sivakasi Nadar's Pioneer Meenakshi Women's College (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSOURCE and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 18:08, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Arts and Science College, Karwar


Arts and Science College, Karwar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 07:12, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

MES's M. M. College of Arts and Science, Sirsi


MES's M. M. College of Arts and Science, Sirsi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSCHOOL and GNG Filmssssssssssss (talk) 07:13, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Milad-E-Sherief Memorial College, Kayamkulam


Milad-E-Sherief Memorial College, Kayamkulam (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSCHOOL and NSOURCE Filmssssssssssss (talk) 07:35, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Syed Hameedha Arts and Science College


Syed Hameedha Arts and Science College (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 07:43, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Alagappa University Evening College, Rameswaram


Alagappa University Evening College, Rameswaram (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Outdated (permanently closed) college. Also little coverage failing NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 07:44, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Pookoya Thangal Memorial Government College


Pookoya Thangal Memorial Government College (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG Filmssssssssssss (talk) 07:49, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Nalanda College of Arts and Science


Nalanda College of Arts and Science (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSCHOOL and GNG Filmssssssssssss (talk) 06:48, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

N. S. S. College, Manjeri


N. S. S. College, Manjeri (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:V and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 08:31, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

College of Applied Science Kozhikode (IHRD)


College of Applied Science Kozhikode (IHRD) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 02:13, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Snow keep Degree awarding institution. Lots of search results. In terms of GNG, there’s gotta be a presumption that local print newspapers supply notability. RadioactiveBoulevardier (talk) 03:55, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 01:35, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

College of Applied Science Thamarassery (IHRD)


College of Applied Science Thamarassery (IHRD) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Page is pretty much just a WP:BROCHURE. Also fails WP:V Filmssssssssssss (talk) 02:13, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SatnaamIN (talk) 09:08, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

R. Sankar Memorial Arts and Science College


R. Sankar Memorial Arts and Science College (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 02:14, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SatnaamIN (talk) 09:07, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete. Fails WP:NSCHOOL. Against redirect that has no source to support its existence. RangersRus (talk) 16:45, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

Sree Narayana College, Cherthala


Sree Narayana College, Cherthala (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 02:19, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

Servite et contribuere (talk) 03:33, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete or Redirect? Need policy based consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SatnaamIN (talk) 08:53, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Science Proposed deletions

  • Flow arrangement (via WP:PROD on 17 January 2025)
  • Reiner Kümmel (via WP:PROD on 16 January 2025)
  • Measure (physics) (via WP:PROD on 7 December 2024)
  • Evolution equations in high-energy particle physics (via WP:PROD on 4 December 2024)

Science Miscellany for deletion

Science Redirects for discussion

Deletion Review

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI