User talk:Johnsoniensis

Johnsoniensis, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Johnsoniensis! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Rosiestep (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:07, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

Rogation Days

Thank you for your reply - I think it might be helpful if you were to express your opinion on the article's Talk page.

Robocon1 (talk) 19:58, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Sorry, the section to look at is "Custom carried by Slave Holders" Robocon1 (talk) 20:12, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for the heads up.--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 21:29, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Gentile de' Becchi

I notice that you have just tagged the article as C-class for a number of categories.

C-class: The article is substantial, but is still missing important content or contains much irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup.

• The important content is covered
• It doesn't contain irrelevant material
• It is fully referenced
• It doesn't require substantial cleanup.

The article is short because there is not a great deal of information available. All the apparent major events of de' Becchi's life are covered, except his date of birth and education, which are unknown to his biographers.

I would rather that you didn't assess the article at all, rather than assess it as a C-class, when it is plainly to developed, too well written and too well supported with references to fit in that category. Once assessed, an article tends to stay that with that assessment. Would you mind taking another look at it. Amandajm (talk) 12:02, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Having has a second look it is apparent that the article is of a higher standard and the content is thoroughly referenced. Sorry for being too careless earlier.--Johnsoniensis (talk) 15:41, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Talk:List of people from Evanston, Illinois

Hello, recently you added a BioProj assessment to the List of people from Evanston. I edit a lot of these lists and am an active member of the BioProject. I don't disagree with you that this is a Biography related list, but I never saw it that way and was simply inquiring about your reasoning. Cheers. --Dkriegls (talk to me!) 05:51, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

If I come across a list which does not have a banner for WP Lists already I usually add one. In the case of lists of people I would add a WPBIO banner as well on the basis that it relates to the organization of biography articles. ("The Biography WikiProject concerns the creation, development, and organization of Wikipedia's articles about persons.") I know I am not a member of those projects so if this was against policy I would stop this.--Johnsoniensis (talk) 09:25, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

P.S. There are also many cases like Talk:List of Bohemian consorts where the article is relevant to a particular work group, in this case Royalty.--Johnsoniensis (talk) 20:57, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

No, no policy. I was just seeing if you had a compelling enough reason to motivate me to go through and add it to all the People from...lists. Your reason is sound enough for your edit, but not compelling enough for me as I doubt anyone for the project would take notice, if that makes any sense. Cheers. Dkriegls (talk to me!) 05:41, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

Bare URLs in Simona Halep wiki?

Hello, Naki here! Please could you let me know which URL citations exactly are bad/bare? Thanks in advance. Naki (talk) 11:02, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

Christian music

Thanks for correcting Geistliche Chormusik and the project tag. Most of the other works by Schütz, and hundreds of works by Bach would be in the same project, right? And many other articles I wrote, such as Rutter's Magnificat, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:06, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

Precious

Cornish villages and churches
Thank you, Oxonian bookworm, for quality articles on Cornish villages and churches such as Tintagel Parish Church, and for gnomish work in article assessment for projects, style improvements, redirects, moves, precision, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:39, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

A year ago, you were the 916th recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:24, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Five years ago, you were recipient no. 916 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:15, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

Category:Kenites

Category:Kenites, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 05:33, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Rivers Articles

Hi Johnsoniensis. Thought I would drop by and say thank-you for the rivers assessments you have done over the last year. I think we were both trying to reach the same goal of reducing the Category:Unassessed River articles to zero, which has now been done, at last. Thanks again...Jokulhlaup (talk) 17:00, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Confused by your edit comment

Sorry to bother you, but on this edit you placed the comment: "wp x 2". May I bother you to explain what "wp x 2" means? Thanks in advance. Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 12:13, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

It is an abbreviated way of saying two WikiProject banners have been added to the page; "difference between revisions" will show what they are.--Johnsoniensis (talk) 12:20, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Thanks! Yes, I'd worked out that it was an abbreviated way of saying that it was 2 x something - just not what the "something" was. Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 13:35, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Costello

Hello, that article referenced this book and I can find no mention of that spelling there so presume it is a mistake. Vladeraz (talk) 13:34, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Image placement

Hi Johnsoniensis. I see you're moving images on Doom Bar over from the left. My understanding was that images should be staggered from left to right, per WP:IMGLOC. You say it's deprecated in the top left of sections, can you point me to the discussions where that was decided so I can have a look? Cheers Worm^TT(talk) 11:15, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

weird

Not sure why you wanted to paint the talk page tags blue in your edit at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:List_of_Mexican_saints - it would be much more helpful to do the full assess - as it is you have left ?? in the importance.... Also I rarely ever see any of my talk page editing added or amended. (most eds are not the slightest interested in maintaining project tags) . The 'List' project tag in effect becomes redundant if you have put 'list' as the class in the other projects. I could go on at length, but... If indeed you are interested in project tagging, or in assessing - good luck to you - there is no support for the activity (not that I have ever seen). satusuro 13:08, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

Even weirder - saints - is a stand alone project - and by extension should have only the tag for that project at project pages - so a bit mystified as to why biography creeps in there... ? satusuro 13:13, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

Oh well happy christmas, and in all AGF and all the rest your answer feels quite unconvincing to say the least, trust you have a good new year as well. satusuro

Sanchi Stupa number 2 ‎

"(conformity with WM Commons)" is the worst possible reason to move an article title, and not supported by the relevant policy. Where there is a difference, as often, Commons can be pretty much guaranteed to be wrong. Nor did you edit the article to reflect the move. Please move it back. Johnbod (talk) 03:50, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

Thanks! Johnbod (talk) 15:05, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: St Martin, Looe (June 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mjs1991 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:St Martin, Looe and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:St Martin, Looe, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mjs1991 (talk) 11:56, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

WikiProject History to WikiProject Russia ?

Why did you change Timeline of Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections from wp:WikiProject History to wp:WikiProject Russia, wouldn't it be both? I don't really know what wp:WikiProjects are. X1\ (talk) 19:21, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Talk:Church of St. Nicholas in Tolmachi

You rated this article as B-class?! You're saying I wrote a B-class article from scratch?!! [0_0] –MJL ‐Talk‐^🍰 16:46, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

James Hamilton (English army officer)

Dear Johnsoniensis. Thank you for rating the article James Hamilton (English army officer), to which I contributed. You decided it is a stub. I was surprised, but then I am a newby on Wikipedia, and my English is not native. My understanding of the assessment process is surely still very limited. The article has 11 sections and 52 citations from 28 sources. Admittedly it lacks images. Perhaps, I should not have touched the Projects header of the talk page. With many thanks and sorry for bothering you. Best regards Johannes Schade (talk) 11:51, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia page Talk:Tom Lane (computer scientist) has been changed by Johnsoniensis

Hi Joansoniessis. I see that you added a "s&a-work-group" tag to the "Tom Lane (computer scientist)" page. I've looked around to try to figure out what that tag is but to no avail... could you please let me know what it is about otherwise I am tempted to remove it. Kind regards ChrisLaneLightfoot (talk) 20:36, 17 October 2019 (UTC) ChrisLaneLightfoot

New & unique sports list

https://www.topendsports.com/sport/new/list.htm This should be put on Wikipedia Relayball47 (talk) 03:43, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Help!

Have a good day mr. Johnsoniensis, excuse me, Could you help me edit the page Trần dynasty military tactics and organization, my English not good so that my article have a Template on head, hope you edit it to true english grammar and delete the template. Đông Minh (talk) 11:39, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

Johnsoniensis: why? I'm seeing you online on wikipedia, why not, aren't you english man? it's just want to edit to true english grammar. Alright! so thank you, bye bye. Đông Minh (talk) 12:00, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

Researching the statement: ...." In the 17th, 18th and 19th centuries, the family owned many castles and large residences. It's said that they owned up to 99 castles but never 100 as this would have required their personal contribution to fund the imperial army."....

Hi, I came across this statement : ..."In the 17th, 18th and 19th centuries, the family owned many castles and large residences. It's said that they owned up to 99 castles but never 100 as this would have required their personal contribution to fund the imperial army."... on the wiki page : https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pálffy_ab_Erdöd&oldid=910976523

I have no idea "how" wiki works, and was trying to email the creator of this page, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pálffy_ab_Erdöd&oldid=910976523, where he would have found this claim/statement. what historic book it might come from, etc., etc..

Sadly, after 20 minutes of surfing wiki, I still have no clue why there are no email addresses of writers here to be found.

Could you possibly help me find the right track and the right way of communication so that I could find out who wrote this page with this specific statement?

any help guiding me into the right direction would be much appreciated,

Regards,

Akos Simon email: akosimon@me.com

I am a direct descendent of the Pálffy-Daun of Erdöd family, and hence am very curious where this claim of 99 castles came from. I am not doubting it, but I never heard of it before. It would be fun to be able to see the source of this statement.

• (talk page watcher) This statement seems to have been added on 15 August 2019 by an unregistered editor, so unfortunately there's no way to contact them by email. PamD 00:21, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

Draft:St Martin, Looe concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:St Martin, Looe, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:24, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

"Gangadhar Kumar Rao" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Gangadhar Kumar Rao. Since you had some involvement with the Gangadhar Kumar Rao redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 03:59, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2020!

Hello Johnsoniensis, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2020. Happy editing, Dimadick (talk) 15:14, 21 December 2019 (UTC) Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

A pie for you!

Thanks for rating the Crito article! puggo (talk) 17:31, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

"Topics related to Cornwall, List of" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Topics related to Cornwall, List of. Since you had some involvement with the Topics related to Cornwall, List of redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. UnitedStatesian (talk) 23:45, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

Two-minute silence

Hi I just noticed that you have assessed this article as stub class... How? Were you using an automated process? Looks more like a B or at least C to me! Laterthanyouthink (talk) 13:18, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

Women singers

As my watchlist showed me, you looked at classical women who sing from AA to Teresa Żylis-Gara, which I guess is last in alpha sort: thank you!! Every time someone edits her article I'm afraid that she died, and I still didn't polish it, - perhaps I just should. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:14, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

Lilly and Madeline

I'm not trying to get into an edit war with you. Apparently, what adding the workgroup to the template does is add it to the Women's project. I've never seen this before; I've never seen any discussion about it. Can't imagine that is what is intended. Guessing the Music project template is either miscoded or has been boldly changed. I'll look into it. John from Idegon (talk) 00:18, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

the australian project tries...

re:Mundaring, Western Australia... we try to maintain the 'place' subproject, and where possible discouragement of the 'cities' project tag, and apart from a few glitches, it works that way - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Australian_places - trust you understand... JarrahTree 11:20, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

Novelty Glass Company

Hello Johnsoniensis—thank you for looking over Novelty Glass Company. I may try to upgrade it this summer. Is there anything that stands out as definitely needing to be addressed? Might also work on J. H. Hobbs, Brockunier and Company and Seneca Glass Company this summer. TwoScars (talk) 22:39, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

Boscastle

Hi, do you have the BBC Pronouncing Dictinary? The Boscastle article gave the pronunciation of Bottreaux as But'ry until this IP edit today. DuncanHill (talk) 22:52, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

Yes, I have consulted BBC Pronouncing Dict. However it is not conclusive for Bottreaux at Boscastle or Molland, but only for "Baron Botreaux", so I suppose that means that Butr'y may still be right.--Johnsoniensis (talk) 23:04, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

Thanks - the awful thing is I used to know how it was pronounced locally but time has dulled my recall. DuncanHill (talk) 23:41, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

Reading it in a book one could make the pronunciation up for oneself. This reminded me to look at the article St Budeaux which may well follow the same pattern but no pronunciation has been recorded there (it is obviously needed as a French pronunciation may well be wrong in Plymouth). For Prideaux I think there are two pronunciations.--Johnsoniensis (talk) 09:57, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

Budeaux is Bude-oh. Prideaux is Priddicks for the one near Fowey, I've heard both Priddicks and Priddoh for the Padstow one. Sources will be hard to find - probably 19th century. Trewarmett used to be pronounced (and sometimes spelt) Trerammet. I can remember a few older folk and farmers when I was a little boy down the lane in Treknow who still used it, but you'd be hard pressed to find anyone now using the old pronunciation. DuncanHill (talk) 10:30, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

WikiProject Medicine

If you find that you are often assessing articles for medicine-related people, please try to add |importance=low|society=yes (like this) to them as well. If you don't happen to remember, then someone else will add it later. Thanks, WhatamIdoing (talk) 05:03, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

The fate of St Barnabas Community Fete

Thanks for adding some context to the fete article. The link you've added as a reference doesn't appear to work, though. You're also using what's described as a 2007 source to support a statement about Ralph being the director from 2003 to 2012, which doesn't add up. Did you copy the wrong link across for the reference? --Lord Belbury (talk) 12:01, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

Oh, I see what's happened now, you copied an old reference from St Barnabas's, Bethnal Green. Not sure what that amounts to, I'll see if I can track down an archived copy of the original. --Lord Belbury (talk) 12:05, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

Vicipaedia

Thanks very much for your note. I replied on my la:Disputatio Usoris:Andrew Dalby talk page. Andrew Dalby 13:45, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

Walaric

Something is wrong with your interlanguage link but I don't know how those things work. Srnec (talk) 19:37, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

It should be working now; it goes to a Wikidata entry which includes links to other Wikipedias (in this case French & Dutch) and other sources of information.--Johnsoniensis (talk) 20:20, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:St Martin, Looe

Hello, Johnsoniensis. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "St Martin".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Majash2020 (talk) 05:27, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

Invitation

Hello! Thank you for reviewing Mikhail Konstantinovich Kudryavtsev. I invite you to review Natalya Romanovna Guseva also. Suggestions for improvements would be highly appreciated )) Thanks, Мастер Шторм (talk) 10:40, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Also, kindly note that this concern has been addressed. Please see — User talk:Mcampany/Archives/2020/July#Natalya Romanovna Guseva. Every detail in the article is properly sourced. Thanks, Мастер Шторм (talk) 12:02, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Hello! Thank you so much for reviewing Paul Hockings. I invite you to review Stephen Fuchs as well )) Thanks, Мастер Шторм (talk) 14:39, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

Thanks a lot for reviewing Stephen Fuchs. We/I wrote another one I invite you to review Indera Paul Singh too )) Thanks, Мастер Шторм (talk) 17:04, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

Hello)) I continued to improve Stephen Fuchs, and I invite you to have another look at it. Actually, I want to know that is the article, now, satisfying the B class criteria on the quality scale? Thanks, Мастер Шторм (talk) 10:54, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

Thank you so much)) Thanks Мастер Шторм (talk) 13:40, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

Hello! I hope you are in good health. I, respectfully, invite you to kindly review Hubert Walter (anthropologist) also )) Thanks, Мастер Шторм (talk) 07:20, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for your kindness in accepting my request I had started an article on Edward Eyre Hunt Jr. also. Kindly review it as well )) Thanks, Мастер Шторм (talk) 07:39, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

That is fair enough; it is good that properly researched articles are added. I wrote some articles a long time ago byt do not do so anymore since my last few stub article were assessed as substandard. However assessment and making small additions are still useful.--Johnsoniensis (talk) 08:26, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

Dear Johnsoniensis, with complete sensitivity, best regards, and respect to you, I would like to say that it if feels great to finally hear from you (written comments), and I am kind of feeling like I have just received (heard) a compliment from Snake Eyes Thanks, Мастер Шторм (talk) 08:43, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

You have always accepted my invitations, and I am grateful for that )) If it's not too much to ask, I sincerely invite you to review – Aparna Rao and Stephen Fuchs – two of the articles started by me and worked upon for improvements by Sam-2727. I am sure Sam will also be very happy to see the articles being reviewed )) Also, I would still stay in touch even if the GA nomination is turned down by you That won't change a thing )) Thanks, Мастер Шторм (talk) 09:32, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

My contributions to assessment are restricted to the range stub to B. Getting GA seems to be quite difficult so I would not be involved in that. Also I am now doing less editing than formerly but probably doing several hours a day was too much. If those articles are still unassessed tomorrow I expect to do them.--Johnsoniensis (talk) 10:15, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

OK )) Thanks, Мастер Шторм (talk) 12:19, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

Hello )) I have written one more I invite you to kindly review Georg Pfeffer as well )) Thanks, Мастер Шторм (talk) 12:07, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Hello )) I hope that you are in good health Thank you so much for reviewing Georg Pfeffer )) I have added one more article )) I invite you to please review Susan Snow Wadley also Thanks, Мастер Шторм (talk) 13:48, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Hello I hope that you are doing well and are in good health )) Thanks a lot for assessing Susan Snow Wadley. After quite some time, I have written one more article )) I humbly invite you to kindly review Vidya Dhar Mahajan as well. Thank you for your kindness )) Soft and warm bear hugs to you Thanks, Мастер Шторм (talk) 17:51, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello )) Thank you so much for reviewing Vidya Dhar Mahajan Thank you so much for your time )) I have written one more article )) I respectfully invite you to kindly assess Bhats as well )) Thanks, Мастер Шторм (talk) 09:45, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello I hope that you and everyone around is in good health. Thank you so much for reviewing Bhats )) Thank you for your time and kindness )) Soft and warm bear hugs to you )) I have added one more article today )) I respectfully invite you to kindly review Ram Pande also )) Thanks, Мастер Шторм (talk) 13:56, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Hello I hope that you and all people around you are in good health ))))) After some break, I started one more article yesterday I sincerely invite you to kindly review International Institute for the Study of Nomadic Civilizations. Bear hugs, Мастер Шторм (talk) 09:38, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Hello my dear ))))) I hope that you everything is good in your life ))))) Thank you so so much for reviewing International Institute for the Study of Nomadic Civilizations There is a missing unfilled assessment parameter at Talk:Bhats which I had forgotten to add earlier! Forgive me I have added it now. I respectfully invite you to please fill the missing parameter. Soft and warm bear hugs, Мастер Шторм (talk) 15:04, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Hello I hope that you and everyone around you are in good health. Thank you for answering the above request ))))) I have written one more BLP I sincerely invite you to review Nükhet Sirman. Soft and warm bear hugs, Мастер Шторм (talk) 20:21, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for your good wishes: I hope things go well with you.--Johnsoniensis (talk) 21:24, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello I hope and wish that you and all the people in your life and in good health. Thank you so much for reviewing Nükhet Sirman ))))) I have added one more BLP article I warmly invite you to kindly review Dirk H. A. Kolff also. Lots of soft and warm bear hugs, Мастер Шторм (talk) 17:00, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Hello ))))) I hope and wish that you and everyone around you are in the best of health. Thank you so much for reviewing Dirk H. A. Kolff )) I have written one more BLP I humbly invite you to kindly review Harald Tambs-Lyche as well. Lots of soft and warm bear hugs, Мастер Шторм (talk) 15:23, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

Hello ))))))) How are you doing my dear? I hope everything is great in your life, and in the life of everyone in your life! Thank you so much for reviewing Harald Tambs-Lyche I have added one more BLP I humbly invite you to kindly review Denis Vidal. Soft and warm bear hugs, Мастер Шторм (talk) 15:50, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

Thank you so much for reviewing Denis Vidal. You didn't answer? Because of the pandemic, people are having tough times! I really do hope that everything is good in your life! Soft and warm bear hugs, Мастер Шторм (talk) 16:07, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

Wrong projects, again....

here. I don't think it even belongs in the dormant "religious texts". In reality, the only project likely to take the slightest interest in these illuminated ms is of course visual arts. Johnbod (talk) 12:28, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

Thank you!!

For your edit on Warleggan (novel). What a great catch. Novellasyes (talk) 13:02, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Disabled Wikipedians

A tag has been placed on Category:Disabled Wikipedians requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 21:19, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

Mega Bog and Claire Cronin (singer-songwriter)

I avoided placing these articles in "American x" categories or mentioning nationality in the lede of either because I wasn't able to find sources to support those claims. While they're certainly both likely to be American, it's not something we can necessarily assume – unless, I suppose, we interpret "American" broadly to mean "living and working in the U.S." rather than "born there". Or perhaps you've found some sources I'd missed? Interested to hear your thoughts either way. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 19:16, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

== Mega Bog and Claire Cronin == Hello, Thank you for your message. The reason for calling them American is the categories "from Los Angeles" and "from Athens, Georgia". I know that such categories often include people who have gone there to live and are really from some unidentified place. I have no objection if "American" is deleted.--Johnsoniensis (talk) 19:34, 28 September 2020 (UTC)--Johnsoniensis (talk) 09:41, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Missing cite in Cholet

The article cites "Augustin Jeanneau 1974" but no such source is listed in bibliography. Can you please add? Also, suggest installing a script to highlight such errors in the future. All you need to do is copy and paste importScript('User:Svick/HarvErrors.js'); // Backlink: [[User:Svick/HarvErrors.js]] to your common.js page. Thanks, Renata (talk) 03:58, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

See her talk page for response.--Johnsoniensis (talk) 17:47, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 20

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Kulyash Baiseitova

added a link pointing to Stalin Prize

Marloes (disambiguation)

added a link pointing to Loes

Temperance Billiard Halls

added a link pointing to Eccles

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

The link to Loes seems adquate. The others have been changed.--Johnsoniensis (talk) 06:26, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Category:Disabled Wikipedians has been nominated for deletion

Category:Disabled Wikipedians has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:03, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

Category:Cornish architects has been nominated for renaming

Category:Cornish architects has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 17:03, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

Civil parish bot

Hi. You seem to have been left off an original ping list for this one. Your involvement in place articles could suggest you might interested in this topic. Thanks. See:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_England/Parishes_RfC Acabashi (talk) 14:27, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Cuimin

hllo johnsoniensis, what is your connection or interest in St Cuimin of May. thanks. [user names. pcummin, and philylavell] --Johnsoniensis (talk) 09:27, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Re: saint of Kilcummin in Mayo, Ireland; from anon. IP.--Johnsoniensis (talk) 20:42, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Article assessment

Hi John! I noticed you assessed Traditions of Pomona College as C-class. Since I have that page up for GAN, I'd hope it meets all of the B-class criteria. If you noticed any flaws that prevented it from getting to B, please let me know. Cheers, {{u|Sdkb}} ^talk 19:08, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

Empire AS ^Talk! — is wishing you a Happy New Year! It's the last day of 2020 and tomorrow will be 2027. Hope the coming year brings pleasures for you. Have a prosperous, enjoyable and a productive 2027. This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the New Year cheer by adding {{subst:New Year 2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Empire AS ^Talk! 19:08, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

A cup of tea for you

A cup of tea for Johnsoniensis. Thank you for rating pages on women artists!. WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 16:42, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

From Pcummin

hello Johnsoniensis, Why are you interested in St Cummin of Mayo. posted by philip cummings born liverpool 1940.[user names pcummin and philylavelle.]--Johnsoniensis (talk) 10:55, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Category:Recipients of the Order of Philip the Magnanimous has been nominated for listification

Category:Recipients of the Order of Philip the Magnanimous has been nominated for listification. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 01:33, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Ratings

Hi! :) I noticed that you've rated at least a couple of my recently-created articles. I usually rate my articles for just the one project that I feel qualified to do so, while also adding blank banners (as in, without parameters) for other projects that I think are appropriate. Am I right in thinking that you're then rating the articles for those other projects purely on the basis of my one original rating? I'm just trying to understand the rationale, and more generally how the rating does or should work, because I've asked a few people and received a few different answers, some of which are contradictory, and so far I'm none the wiser, really. Thanks, --DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:11, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Jinsha Site

Hi! I have been working on article called Jinsha site that you helped in 2013! I am doing this as part of my university course. Currently, I am working on the format, citation as well as enhancing my writing style! Any suggestions would be lovely. Thank you.--Anninarose (talk) 01:06, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

Gourd mouth organ

Hello there, I'm currently working on expanding the article Gourd mouth organ as a part of my university unit. I can see that you are an expert in Burma culture, can you please help me improve my article by giving any feedback, advice or assessment? Thank you very much! And hope you have a lovely day. Ryssian (talk) 20:37, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

WP Women on talk pages

Hi there, Johnsoniensis, and thank for your interest in talk pages. I've noticed that you have recently deleted WP Women from a number of women's biographies, despite the fact that the tag had been specifically added by other editors. One of the reasons they did so was because it provides a listing on the WP Women page of articles threatened with deletion. It allows editors interested in reducing the gender gap to take any remedial action which appears necessary. In future, it would help if you left it in place, even though I can understand your logic that if there is a more specific banner, the general banner is superfluous. Please let me know if I can be of further assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 14:33, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

Rating

Just a question. When it concerns Scandinavian history what is "high" vs "low importance" when you rate articles? I was really surprised to see some quite notable topics being rated "low importance" by you.--Berig (talk) 19:44, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Edict of Amboise rating

I was a little surprised to see you rate the Edict of Amboise article as start class, would you be able to elaborate on what is wrong with it so I can fix it Sovietblobfish (talk) 18:01, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

Motion 103

You recently rated Motion 103 as C-class. What can I do to improve the article's quality? I would like to make it B-class and then nominate it for WP:GA status. VR _talk 01:25, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

@MediaWiki message delivery 5.114.242.139 (talk) 12:37, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

Rating of article Caylee Hammack

Hi, I just saw your rating of the article Caylee Hammack to which I contributed a lo and I'd like to know how you came to this rating. Checking the reference of the quality scale the article seems to be somewhere between a C and a D from the length. As the article also has a lot of references I would really like to know why you think this article is a Stub. --Heubergen (talk) 18:54, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

Institut français du Royaume Uni

Greetings Johnsoniensis. I thought I would let you know that the misleading image of Cromwell Place, London, you inserted in good faith into the piece on Institut français du Royaume-Uni, has no relevance to it whatsoever. The trouble is the correct address is Queensbury Place, but there is no image of it on Wikipedia. The image is misnamed and should be correctly re-titled as Cromwell Place.--Po Mieczu (talk) 13:15, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

Good show

Thank you Johnsoniensis for your rating of Elchonon Wasserman. I have endeavored for three years to prevent this article from slipping into disrepair, especially most recently. It is gratifying to know that someone noticed. Cheers and have a good day. StonyBrook (talk) 12:27, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

Wiki projects

I din't understand your edit as there's no obvius link to Translation studies? Jonathan A Jones (talk) 14:09, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Somogyi26

Thank you for your amendments to my article titled Peter Somogyi. I do acept all yor changes. Kind eregards Somogyi26 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Somogyi26 (talk • contribs) 09:55, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Biography and Criminal Biography parameters are different

Hi Johnsoniensis,

I notice you recently added the following biographic articles about Dong Wenyu, Ned Warren Sr., Alexander Wayne Watson and Thomas Weir to the Crime and Criminal Biography WikiProject by adding banners to the the respective talk pages. In doing so, you appear to have copied the same parameters from the Biography WikiProject banner to the Criminal Biography WikiProject banner. This is not correct because the living= parameter does not work for the {{WikiProject Criminal Biography}} banner.

To save me amending all your edits, please note that the correct criminal biography banner parameters include: {{WikiProject Criminal Biography|class=|importance=}}

thanks - Cameron Dewe (talk) 11:01, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

Jeanne d'Albret

Hello. Thank you but my article Jeanne d'Albret was suppressed by a contributor and redirected with no possibility of discussion even though the name Joan of Albret appears on Wikidata, on WIR (Joan of Albret) and on frWP. What can I say? Thanks all the same.--Parsedan (talk) 22:37, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

A question for you

Hi, out of curiosity, you have over 400k total edits but yet you are only an Extended Confirmed User, how does that work? Neo the Twin (talk) 10:17, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Thank you for your message; I began contributing in 2008 under another username. I do not know about another category of user to which I might belong. Johnsoniensis (talk) 10:24, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Johnsoniensis, are there any special edits you can perform? Like I've seen someone who's like yourself but they could review drafts submitted for verification, what can you do sir? I'm just curious and wanna know if I can do more (review) too. Neo the Twin (talk) 18:54, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

I used to do some work in the way of creating new articles but am not doing so now. Now most of what I do is assessment with occasional changes to existing articles and very occasionally to WPs in other languages. Perhaps you could look at Wikipedia:Reviewing for the conditions required for that. Johnsoniensis (talk) 19:03, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

"Spiritual counsellor (south Asia)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Spiritual counsellor (south Asia) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 27#Spiritual counsellor (south Asia) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 18:56, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Thanks and a question re: Biographical Dictionary of Republican China

I see from your "Contributions" that you are doing the important work of making Talk Pages and ratings. Thanks, especially since this does not usually get noticed unless somebody complains.

But I think Biographical Dictionary of Republican China is beyond "Start" ("An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources"). The article is developed, with five or six reviews quoted, an article about it, and a section on recent developments. If you have no objections, I will raise the rating to B.

Cheers in any case, ch (talk) 04:50, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I agree this is much better than a Start article. Johnsoniensis (talk) 08:52, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

Help!

Thank you so much for rating CRE as diffusion of innovation. It needs to be designated as a subpage, do you know how? I looked at the wiki instructions and thought I did what it said but it came up red. Can you help? I would be grateful! Jenhawk777 (talk) 15:55, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I am sorry I do not know about linking subpages. Johnsoniensis (talk) 16:01, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

That's perfectly okay as clearly I don't either, but The Most Comfortable Chair came along and took care of it, so I am much relieved and deeply genuinely grateful to them. So awesome that people just show up and help isn't it? Jenhawk777 (talk) 16:05, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

You took something from me. Quite unhappy.

Hi Sir,

This is a petty expression of my mind. I feel unhappy that I created the article on Tewolde GebreMariam in March and someone created the same article in another name in June and rather than merge the newer article or point that it already existed, you redirected the article I had created to theirs. I sincerely feel cheated of an article count.

I've said my mind. I did not want to hold it in. Thanks for listening to me. You don't have to undo anything Sir and it's nice to meet someone of your experience.

Keep making Wikipedia amazing. Winks. Danidamiobi (talk) 07:12, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I am sorry you feel you have lost the article you made. The present article still contains the kind of information that was in your version and your citations are now included there. Johnsoniensis (talk) 09:55, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

Article assessment, Listas and Living

Today while looking at Assessment, class B articles for WP Catholicism, I see from this update here, there is no need to add "listas=" and "living=no" to Non-Bio WPs. It's my understanding that those WPs should inherit Listas & Living from the WP Bio wikiproject as long as WP Bio is listed first. Since I use Rater to update assessment, it's fairly easy to delete those extras but I thought to let you know as well. JoeNMLC (talk) 13:37, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

Hello, These extra subfields are included by the process of copying from WPBIO and revising those copies for other WPs which is a quick way to create them. I did not know about the importance of deleting them which would take slightly longer. Johnsoniensis (talk) 13:52, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

WikiProject rating

Hi there, thank you for your work adding WikiProject rating tags to articles. I just wanted to make sure you're aware of WP:RATER as it may make your life easier as some of your edits looked like they were done manually. Thanks. -Kj cheetham (talk) 10:50, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for your suggestion. Johnsoniensis (talk) 10:59, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

Howard Carter

FYI: in the text of the image of Howard Carter that you inserted into the Latin wiki, you changed Latin "Fasciculus" to non-Latin "File" (which works but isn't the locally favored term), and your caption uses the ungrammatical mano (for manu, ablative, fifth declension) and fratri (for fratris, genitive, third declension). These will soon have been fixed. IacobusAmor (talk) 12:07, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Thank you for your corrections. I have forgotten much of the Latin I used to know and rarely go to Vicipaedia. The 1924 portrait came from the Russian WP and the caption needed to be better Latin than my hasty version. Johnsoniensis (talk) 18:26, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

No problem; it's OK now, and thanks for the new image, as such improvements are always welcome! IacobusAmor (talk) 21:06, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

"Non-load bearing wall" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Non-load bearing wall and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 25#Non-load bearing wall until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 65.92.244.114 (talk) 03:42, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Upcountry

The article Upcountry has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article seems like it wasn’t fully baked before posting - no sources, no cats. I don’t see how this is going anywhere productive at this point.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Marleeashton (talk) 00:35, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

Another editor has reformulated the article.--Johnsoniensis (talk) 20:51, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Importance of lists

Hello. Re your assessment of McIver yesterday. You've obviously copied and pasted the WP Anthroponymy template for WPs Scotland and Lists, but that means you've copied Anthroponymy's non-standard use of NA importance for Lists. Almost every other project treats lists as a type of article and thus assign an importance to lists - including WP Scotland and (90% of the time anyway....) WP Lists. Of course the real problem is that Anthroponymy really needs to adopt the SI class which would better describe its lists, but that's another matter. Anyway, please can you remember to change the assessment of lists by other projects to something other than NA - it's particularly noticeable for Scotland as I've just had a big push to clear all the unassesseds! Cheers FlagSteward (talk) 23:01, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Thank you for your message, I am not a member of WP Anthroponymy but usually assess two articles there each day. It would make some sense if that project did without importance assessment (like WP Visual arts and WP Netherlands). There are so many unassessed articles everywhere that considering importance as well should have a lower priority. It seems very few editors want to do assessment so many good articles are not identified as such. Johnsoniensis (talk) 10:07, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

You have to remember the original intention of assessment which was to assign a priority for WikiProjects to work on; I prefer to think of "importance" as "priority", some projects do formally see it that way. We had a good thing going in WP Wine years ago where we collectively attacked the Tops and Highs and got them all up to GA or not far off, which was really worth doing. There's less of that kind of thing these days as WPs are no longer as active as they were, but priorities are still pretty important for the average project where 90% or more are low-priority articles, and it doesn't take that much time to add if you're already assessing. The number of pageviews can be useful in cases where you've no real feel for an article's importance. It's not to be taken too literally - overview articles are always under-read relative to their importance whereas pop culture is relatively...popular - and the numbers vary a bit by subject, but the rule of thumb works surprisingly well that Lows have under 10 views/day and mids have under 100 views/day. Even if it's not a rule to be followed slavishly, it can't be a bad thing to prioritise the articles that our users actually want to read. The Massviews tool can give you the same data in bulk, eg Massviews for Anthroponymy Unassessed which might be useful for choosing which articles to assess in the first place, you might as well do your bit for the most-read articles. Massviews does take a little while to assemble the data so don't be concerned if you get a blank page to start with.

By way of background, I'm waiting for my assessment bot to regain its approval after lapsing during a long Wikibreak. It's great for ripping through Low Start/Stubs, and for doing the edits quickly for manual reviews of the more complicated ones - but it still takes a lot of time and my Wiki time is limited and sporadic. My main targets at the moment are the big country projects like France and Germany where there's thousands of articles that have been tagged but unassessed since 2007/8, but it will take a while to do. FlagSteward (talk) 17:51, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

Template atop a page

Hi. I saw that you recently rated Conrad Tillard. Thanks - I've been working to fill it out. I don't think the template at the of the page is necessary at this point, but thought I would ask you for your view. Thanks. 2603:7000:2143:8500:79D7:90DB:F71F:1BD5 (talk) 23:40, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

Hello, The article is well sourced and as far as I can see unbiased though the subject matter is quite unfamiliar to me.--Johnsoniensis (talk) 00:42, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

Many thanks. I appreciate it. I thought so as well, but as I did much of the recent editing, as with ratings I thought it would be great to have another editor's input. Thanks for addressing it. Also, from the talk page, it looked as though there had previously been some kerfluffle about the article (I myself only first edited the article a few days ago, within the past week, but found the story it reflected to be very interesting). --2603:7000:2143:8500:2446:8158:55F9:494B (talk) 04:58, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

December 2022

Hello, I'm SimLibrarian. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Coffeemaker have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. SimLibrarian (talk) 20:23, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

no objection.--Johnsoniensis (talk) 21:00, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

Happy Holidays!

Johnsoniensis: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, RV (talk) 01:40, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Johnsoniensis!

Happy New Year!

Johnsoniensis,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 20:05, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 20:05, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

Hello - can you please help correct this page?

On the Rolta page to the right, Preetha Pulusani is listed as key management. MS. Pulusani resigned effective March 17, 2021. Her name needs to be removed. Thank you. 122.172.80.14 (talk) 02:28, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

A reliable source is needed to justify the change; I do not have time to research this.

WPHisSites - Warnborough College

Last November, you added Warnborough College to WikiProject Historic Sites. I'm thinking that the only "historic site" it was ever associated with was the former Plater College buildings at Boar's Hill, which burned down and were demolished for redevelopment years ago. I wonder if including it in that project is a bit of a stretch. Banks Irk (talk) 22:10, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Yes that WP seems to have little relevance there. Johnsoniensis (talk) 18:15, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Thanks. Banks Irk (talk) 20:01, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Jean Mignon

You do a lot of ratings, but have you ever actually read this? I suggest you do so. The article contains all known biographical facts about Mignon, and mentions most of his works. It's not even that short, if you assess purely by length, as most assessors seem to do. Johnbod (talk) 04:19, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Burkhard Wilhelm Pfeiffer

Thank you so much for your assessment of the article. Do you have any specific pointers about what can be done to make it better? I would welcome any feedback. Evansknight (talk) 16:09, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for your message. On a second look the article easily meets B class criteria but for German articles a B rating cannot be given without completing the form; so as not to spend too much time on one article I opt out of this. In fact the article looks as if on more thorough consideration GA or A ratings might be given. Johnsoniensis (talk) 13:25, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

Thank you very much. I know very little of the assessment process, so I am just grateful for all that you do to help us improve the quality of Wikipedia as a whole. Evansknight (talk) 20:53, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

Signatures at WPs

We don't add own signatures when we add WPs, e.g. I reverted this https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category_talk:Russian_individuals_subject_to_European_Union_sanctions&diff=next&oldid=1145652228

And please use full WP names, e.g. WikiProject Biography instead of {{bio}}. And I recommend to use "yes" instead of "y", which is not self-explaining--Estopedist1 (talk) 14:06, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for your message. When such a page is created the signature gets added automatically. I see the point of the other advice. Johnsoniensis (talk) 15:28, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

--Estopedist1 (talk) 14:06, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

you are right about "Tag:New topic", it adds signature automatically. You should avoid to use "Tag:New topic" when creating a talk page. Otherwise, someone has to do cleanup work every time you create a new talk page Estopedist1 (talk) 15:46, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

Puzzling ruling

You have very kindly given a grading of B (which is perhaps more than it deserves) to my article Anaclasis (poetry). Meanwhile I have written a companion article, Metron (poetry), which I think is just as good if not rather better; certainly I have done my best to satisfy all the Wikipedia criteria. And yet recently it was graded as "Start" class. It is clearly nothing like the example of a Start-class article on the grading-criteria page, so why Anaclasis should be given a B but Metron only a Start grade is a mystery. It is a bit of an imposition, I know, but if you could cast an eye on the Metron article and check if it has been correctly graded I would be most grateful. Kanjuzi (talk) 16:45, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

Hello; I think at least a B rating is amply justified for both articles. Possibly the lower rating is due to hasty assessment when the assessor only considers grades of start or lower so as not to spend too much time on each article.--Johnsoniensis (talk) 16:53, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

Thank you so much for the regrading! And for your regrading of Mark Hanna Watkins too. I thought that other reviewer was being a bit too hasty. Kanjuzi (talk) 17:33, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

Category:Irish literature by period has been nominated for merging

Category:Irish literature by period has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 12:55, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

Cornish people lists up for deletion

FYI, several articles you created are at AfD:

• Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Cornish geologists and explorers
• Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Cornish philanthropists
• Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Cornish artists, architects and craftspeople

--A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 03:29, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

Plz add dr ahmed ezzat

Hello, please add Dr. Ahmed Ezzat, born on April 22, 1991. He is a well-known doctor and has news in major newspapers such as Sky News.

https://www.skynewsarabia.com/program/influencer/1596612

https://m.gomhuriaonline.com/Gomhuria/1152372.html

https://gate.ahram.org.eg/News/4159397.aspx

https://www.alwatanvoice.com/arabic/news/2022/06/23/1479362.html

https://www.almasryalyoum.com/news/details/2828656

https://ahmedezzat.website 129.45.65.113 (talk) 16:32, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

Invitation

Hello Johnsoniensis!

• The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
• We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
• Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
• Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
• If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

Sent by Zippybonzo using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 07:50, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

Wikiproject listas tagging

Hi there, thanks for all the good work you do on Wikipedia. I wanted to flag when adding listas such as at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Anna_Becker&diff=prev&oldid=1167429587 on biographical articles, you may want to be more explicit than just adding the surname, and add the first name too, i.e. "Becker, Anna" in this case. Thanks. -Kj cheetham (talk) 08:32, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

Elburt F. Osborn

Hello, quick question on this edit. Why remove him from higher education? Is that project not for professors at colleges/universities? --Engineerchange (talk) 12:51, 3 August 2023 (UTC)

There seems not to be a rule about this but this aspect of academics is in the majority of cases dealt with by adding the science and academia work group of WPBIO. Adding Higher education as well seems to me unnecessary.--Johnsoniensis (talk) 15:20, 3 August 2023 (UTC)

Rater script

It looks like you're doing a lot of work on rating articles for WikiProjects. You might find the user script User:Evad37/rater handy. You just add the code to User:Johnsoniensis/common.js (make it look like User:WhatamIdoing/common.js – don't worry about the warning; it's just boilerplate) and a new feature, "Rater", will appear in the menus near the History tab (exactly where depends on your skin, but try looking for one called "Tools"). WhatamIdoing (talk) 22:34, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for the suggestion. Johnsoniensis (talk) 09:57, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

Francisco Torres Oliver article

Please, what′s the problem with this article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.225.161.33 (talk) 16:16, 12 August 2023 (UTC)

I do not see any specific problem.--Johnsoniensis (talk) 16:23, 12 August 2023 (UTC)

And what about your edition? 77.225.161.33 (talk) 18:08, 12 August 2023 (UTC)

Oh, please, sorry. 77.225.161.33 (talk) 18:14, 12 August 2023 (UTC)

That WP applies here: "one of the main proponents of macabre and mystery literature in Spain" Johnsoniensis (talk) 18:17, 12 August 2023 (UTC)

Latin tenses (semantics) article

I am surprised that you think the article Latin tenses (semantics) article is worth giving a B grade to. First of all, the material in the tables is simply copied from from another article, Latin tenses. Secondly, it was the author himself, Daniel Couto Vale, who originally added the rating. (Although Austronesier is credited with 72% of the authorship, this is only because he helped Daniel by copying and pasting the material for him. The real author is Daniel.) And he gave it this rating on the very first day, 13 November 2022, before even starting work on his edits. Thirdly, the material which Daniel himself has added is highly questionable, and he uses terms which are not found in any grammar book, such as agere coepero = "secondary present" (in fact agere coepero "I will have begun to act" is not usually considered a tense at all). No reference is given for such terms. So I'm very puzzled. This article in my opinion doesn't meet the criteria for grade B. It's not suitably referenced and doesn't have reliable sources for things which are likely to be challenged. Can you explain why you have given it a B? Kanjuzi (talk) 18:18, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

In view of your explanations I have cancelled the B rating.--Johnsoniensis (talk) 20:05, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

Great! Good sense has prevailed. Kanjuzi (talk) 09:56, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

Cesare Angelini (author) article

I saw that you rated the article B-class. Can you fill in the checklist and such? Also it was primarily edited by COI users so it is not clear if the sourcing and such will meet such critieria. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 17:39, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

The ratings have been revised.--Johnsoniensis (talk) 09:43, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

Christ Church, Bradford-on-Avon

You assessed this as a C. Please see Wikipedia:Content assessment: "The article is substantial..." – but this is nowhere near that. I have re-assessed as Start. Moonraker (talk) 01:32, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Question

Hi Johnsoniensis, I've noticed you do a lot of rating so I had a question you might be able to help with. I've been working my way through CAT:UNBIO but as you can see in the "A" section, there are a bunch of dab pages getting indexed as unassessed recently. If you go to the talk pages of these dab pages, the source code says dab as the class but the talk page banner is blank instead of displaying it as a Disambiguation page. Thoughts? ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 02:39, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Thank you for your message. I am sorry but do not know why this practice was introduced. Johnsoniensis (talk) 10:40, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

Article assessments

Hi there. Thanks for your work assessing articles. When you add |class= to the banner shell, please consider removing any other ratings from individual banners at the same time (example). Best wishes — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 18:44, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!

Dear Johnsoniensis: thank you for assessing a lot of my church articles this year. I guess, of course, thanks for bearing with me. Attached is a little excerpt of the Xi'an Stele that is probably the earliest documentation of the Incarnation in the Chinese language. Merry Christmas and happy new year! Cheers, --The Lonely Pather (talk) 17:53, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

Thank you: Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year to you. Johnsoniensis (talk) 19:23, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

Talk:Pedi people

Hello. Please note that A class is reserved for articles that have undergone two separate impartial reviews. Schierbecker (talk) 04:41, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

Bellaire Goblet Company

@Johnsoniensis: Thank you for updating the talk section of Bellaire Goblet Company. I noticed you rated it as C-Class. Is there something that is preventing it from being B-Class? The person who gave it a C-Class for Companies said that "The article is suitably referenced with in-line citations, however, I note that you have included a list of both in-line citations and a separate list of bulleted references. Numerous references within the bulleted list could be cited as relevant secondary sources within the inline citations of the article." (see User talk:Tynewyrd#Bellaire Goblet Company) Evidently that person does not understand how Harvard references work. I believe the article passes the B-Class criteria (and maybe GA). If not, let me know—and I will fix the problem. TwoScars (talk) 20:36, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Thank you for your message. The C rating was made on the assumption that the earlier rating was still o.k. I see now that a B rating is justified and probably also GA. Johnsoniensis (talk) 21:09, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

Thanks TwoScars (talk) 21:37, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

Stephen I Gutkeled

Hello Could you revise the rating of this article? I think it's definitely not "Start". Thank you. Norden1990 (talk) 01:44, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

Obviously B class.--Johnsoniensis (talk) 09:17, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

Banner shell

Is there a reason you are removing {{WikiProject banner shell}}? Near as I can tell, you're removing this as you add individual WikiProjects, as you did here . The individual WikiProject should be within the shell for project independent quality assessment, even if it's only a single project. see WP:PIQA ButlerBlog (talk) 13:08, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

OK, I will conform to the policy,--Johnsoniensis (talk) 15:47, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

Request to remove "WP Christianity" from Talk:First_Unitarian_Church_of_Rochester_(building)

Hi,

I notice that you added a "WP Christianity" banner to the talk page of the "First Unitarian Church of Rochester (building)" article (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:First_Unitarian_Church_of_Rochester_(building) )

I suspect that banner was added by mistake because Unitarian churches are not Christian churches.  They are non-creedal churches, as explained in the main article for "First Unitarian Church of Rochester".  A member of a Unitarian church is as likely to be a pagan or a Buddhist as a Christian and is even more likely to be an agnostic or atheist.  They would be offended at having their church labeled more narrowly as "just" Christian.

Would you consider removing that banner?

Thanks, Bilpen (talk) 00:06, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Thank you for your message. I am aware of the distinction but was misled by the listing at Category:Unassessed Christianity articles where Unitarian Universalist is listed as a subcategory. Perhaps something needs to be changed there. I have made the change requested. Johnsoniensis (talk) 09:12, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

Thanks! Bilpen (talk) 12:36, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

Jimmy Creech

My mother, Sandy Hendrickson, was a personal friend of Jimmy Creech. She was the first AIDS caseworker in North Carolina working for the NCDHHS. I have a photo of him and Sandy at my sister's wedding, which he officiated, and we could add to his page.

Any additional information about his work or colleagues would be very helpful, I would like to add more information to his page if I can.

Jimmy might still be alive, I'm trying to find any information about his and Sandy's important work for AIDS patients during the height of the pandemic in the 80's and early 90's Whendricso (talk) 16:39, 24 April 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for your message; I only rated the article and do not have any other relevant information.--Johnsoniensis (talk) 17:16, 24 April 2024 (UTC)

Always precious

Ten years ago, you were found precious. That's what you are, always. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:46, 15 July 2024 (UTC)

WikiProject Literature

Hallo, You added {{WPLIT}} to Talk:Michael Magee (writer), but my reading of Wikipedia:WikiProject Literature#Scope and Related WikiProjects is that the WikiProject isn't concerned with individual authors or works, only with "literary concepts and other general pages on literature". PamD 09:52, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for your message.--Johnsoniensis (talk) 09:55, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you!

Thanks for taking the time to rank Technological Transition in Cartography! GeogSage (⚔Chat?⚔) 19:39, 31 August 2024 (UTC)

"Stub"

Please dont tag all {surname} pages as Stub. A vast majority of them are lists with brief intro and they must be tagges as List. At the same time, there indeed are several surname pages which are "true" articles, such as Smith (surname). --Altenmann >talk 21:08, 31 August 2024 (UTC)

Hello, In fact I have rated most of them as list; the ones I have tagged as stub are those with fewer than three names listed. In view of your comment I will adopt list for those also. Johnsoniensis (talk) 07:44, 2 September 2024 (UTC)

Desta Hagos

Hi Johnsoniensis -- can you clarify what you meant by the edit summary "Ethiopian names need correcting" in Desta Hagos? I'm not very familiar with Ethiopian name systems, and if I've made any errors then I'm happy to correct them, but I'll need a little more information than that. Alanna the Brave (talk) 13:04, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Thank you for your message. There is an article which describes Ethiopian names but the main thing which means they should have special treatment is that a person is given a name after birth but there is no surname in the family. Each person is generally known by combining the given name with the father's name and in a few cases also with the grandfather's (e.g. the present head of the World Health Organization). This is one example of patronymic naming. I am not sure exactly what format is preferred in citations but some ruling on that probably exists. If you need more guidance you could consult WikiProject Ethiopia of which I am not a member.--Johnsoniensis (talk) 13:34, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

All right -- thanks! I'll look into this over the next few days. Alanna the Brave (talk) 15:27, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

Bulcsú

Dear Johnsoniensis! I fully expanded article Bulcsú (chieftain)! Could you re-rate its content assessment scale? Norden1990 (talk) 22:14, 18 October 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Johnsoniensis. Thank you for your work on Little Dawley. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for developing articles on this set of hamlets. Similar status to the others in Category:Dawley Hamlets.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 00:26, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

List of Cornish soldiers, commanders and sailors

Hi, in case you haven't seen it, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Cornish soldiers, commanders and sailors. Hope you are well, DuncanHill (talk) 12:13, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Thank you.--Johnsoniensis (talk) 14:55, 3 March 2025 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Cornish soldiers, commanders and sailors for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Cornish soldiers, commanders and sailors, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Cornish soldiers, commanders and sailors until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Nomination of Roderick O'Donnell for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Roderick O'Donnell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roderick O'Donnell until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bearian (talk) 16:01, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Hello

Greetings! May i ask you for a favour? Can you review my article, Albanian-Yugoslav border conflict (1998-1999) for a C class as i think it meets the criterias. Peja mapping (talk) 13:16, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Mariano Vivanco

Hi there - Mario here - Studio Manager at Mariano Vivanco. I noticed you were in the history tab for the article on Mariano Vivanco. Would you please be so kind as to help with adding more? I've added some source materials in the talk tab but it has yet to be added. I can't seem to do it because I get flagged for being part of Mariano's organization (COI). Many thanks, Mario Marioatphotomv (talk) 11:01, 25 February 2025 (UTC)

Crafthole

Hi Johnsonensis. I'm just going through by whom tags and resolving them, and I've come across an edit you made which was tagged down the line . You attribute it to "Langdon, A. G. (2005) Stone Crosses in East Cornwall; 2nd ed. Federation of Old Cornwall Societies; p. 63".

I wonder if you still have that volume? It'd help to know if that is Langdon's opinion or one he says exists among scholars?

All the best

BNS Boynamedsue (talk) 14:53, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I do have that volume but it is at present difficult to access it. I would presume he refers here to someone else's opinion.Johnsoniensis (talk) 15:04, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

I have found the book; it only says what I added to the article.Johnsoniensis (talk) 15:56, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

Brilliant, thanks a lot for checking. I've removed the whom tag because if the source uses similar language to "it has been suggested" then we are fine to use that too. Sorry for mithering you with this, looking at your editing record I was pretty certain it was going to be correct as it was prior to being tagged.Boynamedsue (talk) 21:55, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

Swindale beck

Hi Johnsoniensis. Thanks for rating Swindale Beck (Brough) and Swindale Beck (Dufton). Please could you also rate Swindale Beck (Lowther)? (They’re being developed individually after spotting that the original single article confused all three becks.) Thanks --Northernhenge (talk) 15:22, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

Request

Hello. I noticed that you like assessing articles, but when it comes down to my articles, you simply add the tag (football) and nothing more. This simple tag might seem harmless at first, but it is actually triggering User:Cloudz679 to assess them, because he assesses everything with that tag.

Out of the many users who have assessed my pages, User:Cloudz679 is by far the one who attributes the lowest classes, which is slowly poisoning my class-ratio. Three weeks ago, I had 80Cs against 100starts, but now I have 110Cs against 180starts. It is beginning to create an imbalance.

He has already reviewed nearly 100 of my pages, and thus far, he has only assessed me ONE B (Juan Ramón Santiago), which is odd, since you have assessed the exact same amount of Bs with just ONE review (Luis Adaro Magro).

I guess you see where this is going… I would much rather have you as my official assessor. And I currently still have +400 unassessed pages under my belt. You can check them here.

If you are not interested in such an honor, then just say it so (instead of leaving me in the dark).

Kind regards. Barr Theo (talk) 01:35, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Thank you for your message. I regret to say I am not interested in football. I have only been editing those articles in an attempt to reduce the number of articles in WP Biography which are not attributed to another WikiProject. So if this is a problem for you I will just leave those pages as they are. Johnsoniensis (talk) 08:53, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

Divine embodiment

Since you rated the article, perhaps you'd care to weigh in on the inevitable and misguided deletion discussion. Skyerise (talk) 14:23, 7 April 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for your message; I regret that I am not well enough informed on the subject to advance any arguments.Johnsoniensis (talk) 14:43, 7 April 2025 (UTC)

Léa Steinacker

Thank you for the Léa Steinacker article.

The article appears to materially meet the criteria for a B rating.

Can you help me understand the specific concerns that led to a C rating so that they can be addressed?

Zak Greant (talk) 14:51, 8 May 2025 (UTC)

Hello, It is now obvious that rating at C was too low. What I was doing in the first edit was quickly connecting the article with WP Women and since the field she works in is one I know little about I would not try and do a very thorough assessment; that would be better done by others at a later time. Johnsoniensis (talk) 20:42, 8 May 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for taking another look and for the updated rating! Zak Greant (talk) 08:24, 10 May 2025 (UTC)

Category:Disabled Wikipedians has been nominated for discussion

Category:Disabled Wikipedians has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Trilletrollet [ Talk | Contribs ] 00:33, 29 June 2025 (UTC)

Treujenn-Gaol

Hello. Thank you for having started the article about the Breton clarinet on the French wikipedia. I am starting to develop it as I progress in my research on the topic.

I notice you have put a lot of references that aren't used per say in the article. Could I delete them? Gujureja (talk) 01:21, 07 July 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I can only find Treujenn-Gaol in the Breton WP and Wikidata. Please explain what you have found in the French WP. (If you are working on an article with unused references you are free to delete them; they can always be put back if another editor makes use of them.) Johnsoniensis (talk) 23:32, 6 July 2025 (UTC)

This is the Wikidata entry for 3 languages; the Breton stub article is separate at WD.--Johnsoniensis (talk) 13:16, 7 July 2025 (UTC)

Actor or actress

No objection to your changing actor to actress in one of the articles I started. But for my future reference could you point me to the relevant Wikipedia House Style section? ThanksRoundtheworld (talk) 14:39, 13 August 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Thank you for your message: I suppose you refer to "Short description|Portuguese actress and singer". I was not applying any rule but it seemed obvious to use the same occupations as in the lead of the article and I thought the relationship status was outside the purpose of a short description which is read by many people who decide they do not want to read the article. The guidance on the subject is Wikipedia:Short description but I am not going to read it all as it is only very rarely that I edit a short description.--Johnsoniensis (talk) 15:49, 13 August 2025 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nick Tatham

The article Nick Tatham has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability tag up for over twelve years.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jw93d59 (talk) 12:55, 23 September 2025 (UTC)

Change of Title Giripremi Institute of Mountaineering to just Giripremi

Hi Johnsoniensis..

First and foremost, thank you for reviewing and publishing the article for 'Giripremi' mountaineering club. I would like to request you that the name of the article should be just Giripremi and not Giripremi Institute of Mountaineering since the entity's legal name is Giripremi. And there is another entity in the name of Guardian Giripremi Institute of Mountaineering which was founded by Giripremi.

Please let me know what would be the process to rectify this. .Really appreciate your help in the same.

Thanks.

Bhushan Bhushan.harshe (talk) 04:12, 24 September 2025 (UTC)

I have moved the article.--Johnsoniensis (talk) 08:20, 24 September 2025 (UTC)

Please take more care

Hi. I frequently have to correct spelling mistakes and fix templates you have broken. Can you please take more care in checking your edits before pressing "save"? I have started reverting your mistakes because I don't have time to fix them all up. Thank you — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 17:51, 1 October 2025 (UTC)

All right.--Johnsoniensis (talk) 18:22, 1 October 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2021 Wikipedia Asian Month Contributions

A tag has been placed on Category:2021 Wikipedia Asian Month Contributions indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:01, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Julia Briggs

Hi, many thanks for rating Julia Briggs, I appreciate it. I wondered if you had a moment to talk me through your rationale for the C rating? I was hoping that this one would be better than Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study given the range of sources and information. If you can point me to what's missing, I'd like to improve it. Many thanks, Tacyarg (talk) 07:02, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

Hello, As the only thing missing is a portrait I have increased the rating.--Johnsoniensis (talk) 09:06, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for that. I've contacted her universities about portraits. Tacyarg (talk) 09:34, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Stub

Moved to Talk:Shvut Raanan § Stub

The God Abandons Antony

I am interested in the reasons why you assessed the above mentioned article as B class. Ktkvtsh (talk) 05:53, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

I do not remember but I see this has been changed.--Johnsoniensis (talk) 09:45, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

"Basaveshwara Teaching and General Hospital ,Gulbarga" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Basaveshwara Teaching and General Hospital ,Gulbarga has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 December 23 § Basaveshwara Teaching and General Hospital ,Gulbarga until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 20:56, 23 December 2025 (UTC)

Talk page ratings

Please refrain from rating 1000-byte articles as B-class. They are not. Not C either, for the most part they are stubs. Geschichte (talk) 21:08, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

I demoted Coalition for the International Criminal Court to a Start-Class article, but raised it to Mid-importance. Quality is not quantity is not importance: they are all different. Bearian (talk) 18:07, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

I reassessed another "B-class" article to start-class. I am now asking of you to please consider leaving the rating task to others. Geschichte (talk) 21:18, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

Circassians

Hi, I want to improve some articles related to Circassians. I saw that Johnsoniensis rated the page Hatuqay dialect as B. The original author did a splendid job, but I wanted to ask what other improvements could be made to an article like that? Thanks. Angel Eyes ● 💬 23:38, 8 February 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for your message. The article appears to be of a higher quality than B-class and I have no improvements to suggest.--Johnsoniensis (talk) 10:04, 9 February 2026 (UTC)