2022 South Dakota State Treasurer election
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
 County results Haeder: 50–60% 60–70% 70–80% 80–90% >90% Cunningham: 50–60% 60–70% 70–80% 80–90% | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| Elections in South Dakota | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
The 2022 South Dakota State Treasurer election was held on November 8, 2022, to elect the state treasurer of South Dakota. Incumbent Republican Josh Haeder was re-elected to a second term in office, defeating Democratic challenger John Cunningham in a landslide.[1]
Candidates
Nominee
- Josh Haeder, incumbent state treasurer[2]
Democratic primary
General election
Results
| Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | Josh Haeder (incumbent) | 219,334 | 67.02% | +4.67% | |
| Democratic | John Cunningham | 107,916 | 32.98% | −4.67% | |
| Total votes | 327,250 | 100.00% | N/A | ||
| Republican hold | |||||
By county
| County[4] | Josh Haeder Republican |
John Cunningham Democratic |
Margin | Total | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | % | # | % | # | % | ||
| Aurora | 811 | 72.87% | 302 | 27.13% | 509 | 45.73% | 1,113 |
| Beadle | 4,656 | 80.81% | 1,106 | 19.19% | 3,550 | 61.61% | 5,762 |
| Bennett | 582 | 60.88% | 374 | 39.12% | 208 | 21.76% | 956 |
| Bon Homme | 1,745 | 73.72% | 622 | 26.28% | 1,123 | 47.44% | 2,367 |
| Brookings | 7,096 | 61.96% | 4,356 | 38.04% | 2,740 | 23.93% | 11,452 |
| Brown | 8,482 | 64.56% | 4,657 | 35.44% | 3,825 | 29.11% | 13,139 |
| Brule | 1,375 | 70.77% | 568 | 29.23% | 807 | 41.53% | 1,943 |
| Buffalo | 139 | 37.07% | 236 | 62.93% | -97 | -25.87% | 375 |
| Butte | 3,217 | 80.71% | 769 | 19.29% | 2,448 | 61.41% | 3,986 |
| Campbell | 553 | 86.95% | 83 | 13.05% | 470 | 73.90% | 636 |
| Charles Mix | 2,014 | 69.45% | 886 | 30.55% | 1,128 | 38.90% | 2,900 |
| Clark | 1,128 | 77.21% | 333 | 22.79% | 795 | 54.41% | 1,461 |
| Clay | 2,116 | 48.11% | 2,282 | 51.89% | -166 | -3.77% | 4,398 |
| Codington | 7,203 | 70.79% | 2,972 | 29.21% | 4,231 | 41.58% | 10,175 |
| Corson | 499 | 56.32% | 387 | 43.68% | 112 | 12.64% | 886 |
| Custer | 3,680 | 75.85% | 1,172 | 24.15% | 2,508 | 51.69% | 4,852 |
| Davison | 4,761 | 70.26% | 2,015 | 29.74% | 2,746 | 40.53% | 6,776 |
| Day | 1,502 | 64.05% | 843 | 35.95% | 659 | 28.10% | 2,345 |
| Deuel | 1,412 | 75.03% | 470 | 24.97% | 942 | 50.05% | 1,882 |
| Dewey | 611 | 40.92% | 882 | 59.08% | -271 | -18.15% | 1,493 |
| Douglas | 1,210 | 88.13% | 163 | 11.87% | 1,047 | 76.26% | 1,373 |
| Edmunds | 1,230 | 78.05% | 346 | 21.95% | 884 | 56.09% | 1,576 |
| Fall River | 2,685 | 76.45% | 827 | 23.55% | 1,858 | 52.90% | 3,512 |
| Faulk | 730 | 81.38% | 167 | 18.62% | 563 | 62.76% | 897 |
| Grant | 2,201 | 73.93% | 776 | 26.07% | 1,425 | 47.87% | 2,977 |
| Gregory | 1,533 | 79.68% | 391 | 20.32% | 1,142 | 59.36% | 1,924 |
| Haakon | 846 | 90.97% | 84 | 9.03% | 762 | 81.94% | 930 |
| Hamlin | 2,034 | 80.55% | 491 | 19.45% | 1,543 | 61.11% | 2,525 |
| Hand | 1,219 | 84.36% | 226 | 15.64% | 993 | 68.72% | 1,445 |
| Hanson | 1,216 | 79.84% | 307 | 20.16% | 909 | 59.68% | 1,523 |
| Harding | 612 | 94.01% | 39 | 5.99% | 573 | 88.02% | 651 |
| Hughes | 5,304 | 73.71% | 1,892 | 26.29% | 3,412 | 47.42% | 7,196 |
| Hutchinson | 2,385 | 80.74% | 569 | 19.26% | 1,816 | 61.48% | 2,954 |
| Hyde | 442 | 80.22% | 109 | 19.78% | 333 | 60.44% | 551 |
| Jackson | 609 | 68.50% | 280 | 31.50% | 329 | 37.01% | 889 |
| Jerauld | 640 | 78.34% | 177 | 21.66% | 463 | 56.67% | 817 |
| Jones | 397 | 88.22% | 53 | 11.78% | 344 | 76.44% | 450 |
| Kingsbury | 1,780 | 75.46% | 579 | 24.54% | 1,201 | 50.91% | 2,359 |
| Lake | 3,092 | 67.91% | 1,461 | 32.09% | 1,631 | 35.82% | 4,553 |
| Lawrence | 7,982 | 69.08% | 3,572 | 30.92% | 4,410 | 38.17% | 11,554 |
| Lincoln | 17,433 | 67.01% | 8,584 | 32.99% | 8,849 | 34.01% | 26,017 |
| Lyman | 836 | 69.26% | 371 | 30.74% | 465 | 38.53% | 1,207 |
| Marshall | 1,056 | 60.59% | 687 | 39.41% | 369 | 21.17% | 1,743 |
| McCook | 1,752 | 74.33% | 605 | 25.67% | 1,147 | 48.66% | 2,357 |
| McPherson | 906 | 85.96% | 148 | 14.04% | 758 | 71.92% | 1,054 |
| Meade | 8,576 | 76.83% | 2,586 | 23.17% | 5,990 | 53.66% | 11,162 |
| Mellette | 383 | 64.26% | 213 | 35.74% | 170 | 28.52% | 596 |
| Miner | 651 | 72.90% | 242 | 27.10% | 409 | 45.80% | 893 |
| Minnehaha | 40,546 | 58.88% | 28,313 | 41.12% | 12,233 | 17.77% | 68,859 |
| Moody | 1,575 | 63.56% | 903 | 36.44% | 672 | 27.12% | 2,478 |
| Oglala Lakota | 243 | 10.23% | 2,132 | 89.77% | -1,889 | -79.54% | 2,375 |
| Pennington | 28,661 | 66.97% | 14,138 | 33.03% | 14,523 | 33.93% | 42,799 |
| Perkins | 1,098 | 86.39% | 173 | 13.61% | 925 | 72.78% | 1,271 |
| Potter | 871 | 84.07% | 165 | 15.93% | 706 | 68.15% | 1,036 |
| Roberts | 1,956 | 58.79% | 1,371 | 41.21% | 585 | 17.58% | 3,327 |
| Sanborn | 762 | 79.79% | 193 | 20.21% | 569 | 59.58% | 955 |
| Spink | 1,837 | 72.29% | 704 | 27.71% | 1,133 | 44.59% | 2,541 |
| Stanley | 1,082 | 77.51% | 314 | 22.49% | 768 | 55.01% | 1,396 |
| Sully | 616 | 81.27% | 142 | 18.73% | 474 | 62.53% | 758 |
| Todd | 429 | 22.87% | 1,447 | 77.13% | -1,018 | -54.26% | 1,876 |
| Tripp | 1,760 | 81.56% | 398 | 18.44% | 1,362 | 63.11% | 2,158 |
| Turner | 2,782 | 76.37% | 861 | 23.63% | 1,921 | 52.73% | 3,643 |
| Union | 4,701 | 72.67% | 1,768 | 27.33% | 2,933 | 45.34% | 6,469 |
| Walworth | 1,570 | 80.64% | 377 | 19.36% | 1,193 | 61.27% | 1,947 |
| Yankton | 5,205 | 63.86% | 2,946 | 36.14% | 2,259 | 27.71% | 8,151 |
| Ziebach | 318 | 50.56% | 311 | 49.44% | 7 | 1.11% | 629 |
| Totals | 219,334 | 67.02% | 107,916 | 32.98% | 111,418 | 34.05% | 327,250 |
Counties that flipped from Democratic to Republican
Swing by countyLegend
- Republican — +0-2.5%
- Republican — +2.5-5%
- Republican — +5-7.5%
- Republican — +7.5–10%
- Republican — +10-12.5%
- Republican — +12.5–15%
- Republican — +>15%
Trend relative to the state by countyLegend
-
Democratic — +5-7.5%
-
Democratic — +2.5-5%
-
Democratic — +0-2.5%
- Republican — +0-2.5%
- Republican — +2.5-5%
- Republican — +5-7.5%
- Republican — +7.5–10%
- Republican — +10-12.5%
- Republican — +12.5–15%
- Republican — +>15%
County flipsLegend
-
Democratic
HoldRepublican
HoldGain from Democratic
References
- ↑ https://www.argusleader.com/story/news/politics/2022/11/09/south-dakota-election-results-live-marijuana-governor-2022/69631812007/
- ↑ https://www.dakotanewsnow.com/2021/09/24/treasury-secretary-josh-haeder-announces-re-election-bid/
- ↑ https://www.argusleader.com/story/news/2022/07/09/sioux-falls-east-river-candidates-south-dakotas-democratic-ticket-election-2022/10006142002/?gnt-cfr=1&gca-cat=p&gca-uir=true&gca-epti=z114833v114833d--48--b--48--&gca-ft=138&gca-ds=sophi
- 1 2 Barnett, Steve (November 15, 2022). "2022 General Election Official State Canvass Results" (PDF). Secretary of State of South Dakota. Archived (PDF) from the original on September 16, 2025. Retrieved February 12, 2026.
Related Articles
~